Hey,
It's been over a month now. I guess www/dwb can be removed?
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 06:21:50PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Makes sense.
Unless someone steps up in the next days, ok jca@ to remove it.
Henrik Friedrichsen said:
Dmitrij, does dwb work well for you with the new patch?
I don't use it. I was acting upon user request.
So I'm thinking of either updating this port to a dev snapshot, as it
doesn't seem to be in a usable state atm (at least on my machine) or
remove it.
Frankly, I
Hey,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Frankly, I see no point in having it:
1. It is developped on Archlinux and for Archlinux. Developpers seem
to have little interest in portability, and are somewhat hostile
towards patches for fixing things
Henrik Friedrichsen said:
(unfortunately vimb has no tabs ;)
There is x11/tabbed, and tabs in dwb caused me problems in the past.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Henrik Friedrichsen hen...@diff.cc writes:
Hey,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Frankly, I see no point in having it:
1. It is developped on Archlinux and for Archlinux. Developpers seem
to have little interest in portability, and are somewhat
Hey,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Hi!
Diff below stops dwb from segfaulting with glib2 2.40. Taken from
upstream.
After some further testing with this patch I have noticed an
improvement, but it still crashes a lot.
The direction dwb is heading is
Hey!
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
czark...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments? OKs?
Thanks Dmitrij. OK!
Il 28/giu/2015 11:51, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hi!
Diff below stops dwb from segfaulting with glib2 2.40. Taken from
upstream.
Comments? OKs?
Bump revision.
Then ok with me.
Ciao,
David
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Index: patches/patch-src_application_c
