On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:22:51 -0400
Kurt Mosiejczuk :
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
>
> > > Remove it?
>
> > Why remove it? Because it's python2? Do we have a python2 expiration
> > policy? (I see others OS have a deadline for python2 removal, maybe
> > we
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> I don't really care about the port itself, but I think we need to
> define a clear policy about python2 removal crusade.
> I get that python2 is end of life. We have lot of python2 ports that
> are python2 only. Do we remove
Le 2020-09-19 19:48, Kurt Mosiejczuk a écrit :
pcapdiff doesn't have any consumers and is python2 only. pcapdiff
is no longer under development. (It's homepage at EFF refers one
to another project instead).
Remove it?
--Kurt
Why remove it? Because it's python2? Do we have a python2
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 02:22:51PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
>
> > > Remove it?
>
> > Why remove it? Because it's python2? Do we have a python2 expiration
> > policy? (I see others OS have a deadline for python2 removal, maybe
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> > Remove it?
> Why remove it? Because it's python2? Do we have a python2 expiration
> policy? (I see others OS have a deadline for python2 removal, maybe
> we should do the same)
It's python2.
It's not available from its author,
pcapdiff doesn't have any consumers and is python2 only. pcapdiff
is no longer under development. (It's homepage at EFF refers one
to another project instead).
Remove it?
--Kurt