I don't see any point in having this port when we already have (better
documented) nc(1) in base. And this will get rid of conflict with
net/ucspi-tcp. Nothing depends on net/tcpcat as well.
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
On 2014/07/24 19:08, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
I don't see any point in having this port when we already have (better
documented) nc(1) in base. And this will get rid of conflict with
net/ucspi-tcp. Nothing depends on net/tcpcat as well.
OK to zap it, though perhaps it makes sense to add the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:17:50PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/07/24 19:08, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
I don't see any point in having this port when we already have (better
documented) nc(1) in base. And this will get rid of conflict with
net/ucspi-tcp. Nothing depends on net/tcpcat as
