maintainer update, net/gajim --> 1.8.4

Hi ports@, This is an update for net/gajim to its latest version 1.8.4 Quite some changes and bugfixes since 1.8.1 as you can see on the changelog: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/blob/master/ChangeLog?ref_type=heads Tests pass and works for me on amd64. Ok to commit ? diff /usr/ports

Re: maintainer update. net/gajim --> 1.8.1

On 2023/10/17 21:44:51 +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.8.1 > > According to its changelog, these are the changes on Gajim for this > release: > > [...] > > It needs the update for net/py-nbxmpp sent on another thread. > >

maintainer update. net/gajim --> 1.8.1

Hi ports@, This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.8.1 According to its changelog, these are the changes on Gajim for this release: New * Add setting for default encryption Improvements * XMLConsole: Enable browsing sent stanzas in message input (#5403) *

Re: maintainer update net/gajim --> 1.8.0

On 2023/07/24 18:16:25 +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.8.0 > One of the big changes in this release is that they integrated the OMEMO > encryption plugin into gajim. This needs a new library I ported and > sent to the list in a

maintainer update net/gajim --> 1.8.0

Hi ports@, This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.8.0 One of the big changes in this release is that they integrated the OMEMO encryption plugin into gajim. This needs a new library I ported and sent to the list in a separate thread. Everything works fine for me on amd64 but

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.5.2 --> 1.7.3

On 2023/05/27 17:09, Paco Esteban wrote: > post-install is all I needed, but thanks for the snippet :-) > I had to tweak the rmdir line, as that expands to man, then man/man1 and > rmdir fails. ah yes :) > Here's the complete modified diff. > > Ok to commit ? ok.

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.5.2 --> 1.7.3

On Fri, 26 May 2023, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > [...] > > Any help here appreciated. > > If MODPY_PYBUILD is set to anything other than "No" then it does a > build using PEP517 infrastructure which uses whatever is setup in the > pyproject.toml file as the backend (which has a fallback to using

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.5.2 --> 1.7.3

On 2023/05/20 19:30, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update for net/gajim to its latest version 1.7.3 > Tons of changes since last version. I did not update sooner because of > setuptools version dependency. Find the full changelog here: > >

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.5.2 --> 1.7.3

On Sat, 20 May 2023, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update for net/gajim to its latest version 1.7.3 > Tons of changes since last version. I did not update sooner because of > setuptools version dependency. Find the full changelog here: > >

maintainer update net/gajim 1.5.2 --> 1.7.3

Hi ports@, This is an update for net/gajim to its latest version 1.7.3 Tons of changes since last version. I did not update sooner because of setuptools version dependency. Find the full changelog here: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/python-nbxmpp/-/blob/4.2.2/ChangeLog Upstream seems to have

Re: maintainer update net/gajim --> 1.5.2

On 2022/10/18 19:57:32 +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.5.2 > Lots of changes and bugfixes since the version we have in ports (1.4.7): > https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/blob/master/ChangeLog > > One of the most interesting

maintainer update net/gajim --> 1.5.2

Hi ports@, This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.5.2 Lots of changes and bugfixes since the version we have in ports (1.4.7): https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/blob/master/ChangeLog One of the most interesting ones is that, after a user opened an issue, there was some

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

On 2022/09/06 21:18:09 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/09/06 10:09, Omar Polo wrote: > > > > -# and fixed it on 1.3.3-2 > > > > -# https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10719 > > > > -DISTFILES= gajim-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-2${EXTRACT_SUFX} > > > > +MASTER_SITES=

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

On 2022/09/06 10:09, Omar Polo wrote: > > > -# and fixed it on 1.3.3-2 > > > -# https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10719 > > > -DISTFILES= gajim-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-2${EXTRACT_SUFX} > > > +MASTER_SITES=${HOMEPAGE}/downloads/1.4/ > > > > Insted of harcoding 1.4, you can use: > >

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

On 2022/09/05 18:49:16 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 06:42:19PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, Paco Esteban wrote: > > > > > Hi ports@, > > > > > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.4.7 > > > There are a lot of changes for the

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 06:42:19PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, Paco Esteban wrote: > > > Hi ports@, > > > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.4.7 > > There are a lot of changes for the software itself. Take a look at the > > changelog here: > > > >

Re: maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.4.7 > There are a lot of changes for the software itself. Take a look at the > changelog here: > > https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/blob/master/ChangeLog > > On the port itself,

maintainer update net/gajim 1.3.3 --> 1.4.7

Hi ports@, This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.4.7 There are a lot of changes for the software itself. Take a look at the changelog here: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/blob/master/ChangeLog On the port itself, the major change is the removal of the plugin installer

Re: [maintaner update] net/gajim 1.3.3

Ping. Diff at the end for convenience. Modified to apply after the RCS Ids drop. On Wed, 26 Jan 2022, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.3.3 > > We go from 1.3.1 to 1.3.3. > The changelog mentions this changes: > > * Profile: Add

Re: [maintaner update] net/gajim 1.3.3

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Yifei Zhan wrote: > On 22/01/26 07:05PM, Paco Esteban wrote: > > Hi ports@, > > > > This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.3.3 > > > > We go from 1.3.1 to 1.3.3. > > > This does not build on arm64: > > ===> Building package for gajim-1.3.3 > Create

[maintaner update] net/gajim 1.3.3

Hi ports@, This is an update of net/gajim to its latest version 1.3.3 We go from 1.3.1 to 1.3.3. The changelog mentions this changes: * Profile: Add NOTE entry * Accounts: Add account switch description * Port AdHocCommand window to new Assistant * Update API JID for

Re: update net/gajim to 1.3.0 (and net/py-nbxmpp to 2.0.1)

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Paco Esteban wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 3un0s wrote: > > > > > Hi ports@, > > > > > > This is an update for net/gajim and also net/py-nbxmpp as gajim requires > > > that. I've been running beta of 1.3.0 and this release on

Re: update net/gajim to 1.3.0 (and net/py-nbxmpp to 2.0.1)

On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 3un0s wrote: > > > Hi ports@, > > > > This is an update for net/gajim and also net/py-nbxmpp as gajim requires > > that. I've been running beta of 1.3.0 and this release on amd64 for > > quite some time now and everything seems to

Re: update net/gajim to 1.3.0 (and net/py-nbxmpp to 2.0.1)

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 3un0s wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update for net/gajim and also net/py-nbxmpp as gajim requires > that. I've been running beta of 1.3.0 and this release on amd64 for > quite some time now and everything seems to work fine. > > Any comments or OK? Both ports look

update net/gajim to 1.3.0 (and net/py-nbxmpp to 2.0.1)

Hi ports@, This is an update for net/gajim and also net/py-nbxmpp as gajim requires that. I've been running beta of 1.3.0 and this release on amd64 for quite some time now and everything seems to work fine. Any comments or OK? Index: net/gajim/Makefile

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

ping ? On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is an update for net/gajim. It includes also an easy dependency > update for net/py-nbxmpp, as the new Gajim version needs the last one > available. > > Tested on amd64 against a prosody running also on -current. All seems

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

Python-axolotl isn't a Gajim dependency on Archlinux for instance. On the window to enable OMEMO plugin (which isn't enabled by default), it is said that it requires python axolotl.

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

>From an "intermediate" user's perspective, I would agree with @solene. I suspect a variety of users will use this, and since it is a GUI program they probably aren't so crazy about footprint that they would resent it, but they might not go to the README first. I read manpages, and faq's but I

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:05:32 +0100 Paco Esteban : > Hi ports@, > > This is an update for net/gajim. It includes also an easy dependency > update for net/py-nbxmpp, as the new Gajim version needs the last one > available. > > Tested on amd64 against a prosody running also on -current. All

Re: update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, Solene Rapenne wrote: > On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:05:32 +0100 > Paco Esteban : > > > Hi ports@, > > > > This is an update for net/gajim. It includes also an easy dependency > > update for net/py-nbxmpp, as the new Gajim version needs the last one > > available. > > ... >

update: net/gajim (and net/py-nbxmpp)

Hi ports@, This is an update for net/gajim. It includes also an easy dependency update for net/py-nbxmpp, as the new Gajim version needs the last one available. Tested on amd64 against a prosody running also on -current. All seems correct to me. For net/gajim, I added a README to point out

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:06:46 +0200 Solene Rapenne : > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 > > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 > > > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Works for me. 17 sept. 2020 08:55:27 Solene Rapenne : > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:06:46 +0200 > Solene Rapenne : > >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 >> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: >> >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 >>> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Hello, Now that the summer break is over for almost everyone, I wish we could approve this package update (and its dependancies). On 14/08/2020 10:16, Guy Godfroy wrote: Works for me, also it solves the bug of the last version. Le 11/08/2020 à 09:06, Solene Rapenne a écrit : On Mon, 10 Aug

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Works for me, also it solves the bug of the last version. Le 11/08/2020 à 09:06, Solene Rapenne a écrit : On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:41:20 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 > > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This diff updates gajim to 1.2.0 > > > It requires a new

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Also current Gajim version on OpenBSD ports seems broken : https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10218 Le 10/08/2020 à 09:41, 3un0s a écrit : On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: Hi, This

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:53:47 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This diff updates gajim to 1.2.0 > > It requires a new version of py-nbxmpp and new package called > > py-css-parser. > > I've already sent

Re: update net/gajim to 1.2.0

On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:24:45 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > Hi, > > This diff updates gajim to 1.2.0 > It requires a new version of py-nbxmpp and new package called > py-css-parser. > I've already sent both of those to this mailing list. > Works for me on amd64. > > Any comments or OK ?

update net/gajim to 1.2.0

Hi, This diff updates gajim to 1.2.0 It requires a new version of py-nbxmpp and new package called py-css-parser. I've already sent both of those to this mailing list. Works for me on amd64. Any comments or OK ? Index: Makefile ===

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 08:15:26AM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > > You need the py-nbxmpp update as well: > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=155704320901616=2 > Updated diff with explicit requirement on 0.6.10 (already in ports > tree). Also adapt PERMIT_PACKAGE at the same time. > OK?

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:24:23AM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:17:28AM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > > On Sun, 05 May 2019, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > > > update Gajim to 1.1.3 (bugfix release). > > > > > > Change log:

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi, On Fri, 10 May 2019, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > You need the py-nbxmpp update as well: > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=155704320901616=2 Works now after installing py-nbxmpp. I had to force FLAVOR=python3 for it. For some reason it was only building the py- version instead of the py3-

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:24:23AM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:17:28AM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > > On Sun, 05 May 2019, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > update Gajim to 1.1.3 (bugfix release). > > > > > > Change log:

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:17:28AM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 05 May 2019, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > update Gajim to 1.1.3 (bugfix release). > > > > Change log: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/blob/gajim-1.1.3/ChangeLog > > > > Works for me on amd64. > > > > OK? > >

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Sun, 05 May 2019, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > Hi, > > update Gajim to 1.1.3 (bugfix release). > > Change log: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/blob/gajim-1.1.3/ChangeLog > > Works for me on amd64. > > OK? After applying your patch and updating I get: No translations found Dirs searched:

UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi, update Gajim to 1.1.3 (bugfix release). Change log: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/blob/gajim-1.1.3/ChangeLog Works for me on amd64. OK? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/gajim/Makefile,v retrieving revision

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Fri Jan 18, 2019 at 08:32:26PM +0100, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > Hi, > > update net/gajim to 1.1.2. > > This needs a newer version of py-nbxmpp and the new dependency > precis-i18n (see separate mails). > > - Simplified dependencies (get rid of common dependencies as the

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

Ping? (original post at https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=154784008621003=2; dependencies at https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=154783925020743=2 and https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=154784001220968=2) On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 08:32:26PM +0100, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > update net/gajim to 1.1.2.

UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi, update net/gajim to 1.1.2. This needs a newer version of py-nbxmpp and the new dependency precis-i18n (see separate mails). - Simplified dependencies (get rid of common dependencies as the build works without them; tested with all corresponding dependencies removed) as listed at https

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

I mucked up by forgetting to readd a patch, and then also noticed the man pages are being compressed :| Please ignore until a new diff comes, sorry for the noise -ryan

UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi ports@, Hi pea@ Simple update to the latest latest version. Changelog: * Improve Zeroconf behavior * Fix showing normal message event * remove usage of OpenSSL.rand * a few minor bugfixes Ok? Comments? Rafael Sadowski Index: Makefile

UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi All! Straightforward update to gajim-0.16.8 Changelog: Gajim 0.16.8 (04 June 2017) * Fix rejoining MUCs after connection loss * Fix Groupchat invites * Fix encoding problems with newer GnuPG version * Fix old messages randomly reappearing in the chat window * Fix some problems with IBB

UPDATE: net/gajim

Hi All, update to the last stable version, see changelog and diff. Gajim 0.16.7 (30 January 2017) * Better compatibility with XEP-0191: Blocking Command * Windows Credential Vault is used for password storage on Windows * Gajim now depends on python-gnupg for PGP encryption * Add portable

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On 2017 Jan 24 (Tue) at 20:39:08 +0100 (+0100), Rafael Sadowski wrote: :On Thu Jan 12, 2017 at 11:25:07AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: :> On 2016 Dec 20 (Tue) at 20:17:34 +0100 (+0100), Rafael Sadowski wrote: :> :On Sun Nov 27, 2016 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: :> :> Rafael

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Thu Jan 12, 2017 at 11:25:07AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: > On 2016 Dec 20 (Tue) at 20:17:34 +0100 (+0100), Rafael Sadowski wrote: > :On Sun Nov 27, 2016 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > :> Rafael Sadowski wrote: > :> > :> >here's an update to gajim

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On 2016 Dec 20 (Tue) at 20:17:34 +0100 (+0100), Rafael Sadowski wrote: :On Sun Nov 27, 2016 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: :> Rafael Sadowski wrote: :> :> >here's an update to gajim 0.16.6. There are lot of changes between :> >0.15.4 and 0.16.6 but

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

On Sun Nov 27, 2016 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > >here's an update to gajim 0.16.6. There are lot of changes between > >0.15.4 and 0.16.6 but everything looks good on amd64. > > > >Tested with my XMPP account and some gajim

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim

Rafael Sadowski wrote: >here's an update to gajim 0.16.6. There are lot of changes between >0.15.4 and 0.16.6 but everything looks good on amd64. > >Tested with my XMPP account and some gajim plugins without any >significant problems. OK czarkoff@

UPDATE: net/gajim

hi, here's an update to gajim 0.16.6. There are lot of changes between 0.15.4 and 0.16.6 but everything looks good on amd64. Tested with my XMPP account and some gajim plugins without any significant problems. Kind regards, Rafael Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org writes: On 2009/01/14 12:06, Simon Kuhnle wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:07:53PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 10.01.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Stuart Henderson: On 2009/01/10 15:35, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: I did several patches, one

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Am 16.01.2009 um 11:40 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: I tested gajim with this patch (http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10848) and it's better but i still have random deconnexions with my jabber servers (Ichat server and 2 ejabberd )(less deconnexions but there are still here). The only thing

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Jonathan Schleifer js-openbsd-po...@webkeks.org writes: Am 16.01.2009 um 11:40 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: I tested gajim with this patch (http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10848) and it's better but i still have random deconnexions with my jabber servers (Ichat server and 2 ejabberd

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:07:53PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 10.01.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Stuart Henderson: On 2009/01/10 15:35, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: I did several patches, one increasing the timeouts to sane values, That sounds like a reasonable thing to put in the port.

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Am 10.01.2009 um 01:59 schrieb viq: Any news on that? BTW, there's 0.12.1 out. 0.12.1 only fixes file transfers. I've given up fixing that timeout bug because whatever I do, there's always someone complaining like But then I won't notice within 5 sec that my connection is down!

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 03:35:53PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 10.01.2009 um 01:59 schrieb viq: Any news on that? BTW, there's 0.12.1 out. 0.12.1 only fixes file transfers. I've given up fixing that timeout bug because whatever I do, there's always someone complaining like But then

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On 2009/01/10 15:35, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: I did several patches, one increasing the timeouts to sane values, That sounds like a reasonable thing to put in the port.

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Am 10.01.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Stuart Henderson: On 2009/01/10 15:35, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: I did several patches, one increasing the timeouts to sane values, That sounds like a reasonable thing to put in the port. http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10848 It was reverted because some

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:42:47PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 19.12.2008 um 12:22 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: Thanks for your update Simon. I will not commit this update now: after a full day of testing, i've some regressions with this version. I tested with 3 accounts based on 3

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:14:06 +0100, Simon Kuhnle si...@blarzwurst.de a écrit : On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:45:34 +0100, Simon Kuhnle si...@blarzwurst.de a écrit : Hi, finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released.

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Am 19.12.2008 um 12:22 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: Thanks for your update Simon. I will not commit this update now: after a full day of testing, i've some regressions with this version. I tested with 3 accounts based on 3 differents servers(ichat server, ejabberd 1.1.2 and ejabberd 2.0.1)

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:45:34 +0100, Simon Kuhnle si...@blarzwurst.de a écrit : Hi, finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released. Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog Thanks to Jonathan Schleifer, all patches are upstream. With this update I'm dropping

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:45:34AM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote: Hi, finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released. Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog Seems to work, even with E2E encryption they just added. Joined a MUC room, talked with one of my contacts using

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

As a quick side note: if you experience problems with e2e encryption gettine messages like 'AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'retained_secrets' removing ~/.gajim/secrets did solve this for me. -- simon

UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

Hi, finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released. Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog Thanks to Jonathan Schleifer, all patches are upstream. With this update I'm dropping maintainership, as I'm not really using gajim anymore, in favor of mcabber. Any takers?

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:45:34 +0100, Simon Kuhnle si...@blarzwurst.de a écrit : Hi, finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released. Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog Thanks to

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim 0.11.3

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:02:07PM +0100, viq wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:44:17PM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote: Patch for src_config_py isn't needed as it was fixed upstream. Though make lib-depends-check gives me the following: WANTLIB: expat.8

UPDATE: net/gajim 0.11.3

Hi, here's a small update to gajim-0.11.3: http://blarzwurst.de/openbsd/gajim.diff Changes: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/branches/gajim_0.11.2/ChangeLog Works for me on i386. Patch for src_config_py isn't needed as it was fixed upstream. Though make lib-depends-check gives me the following:

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim 0.11.3

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:44:17PM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote: Hi, here's a small update to gajim-0.11.3: http://blarzwurst.de/openbsd/gajim.diff Changes: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/branches/gajim_0.11.2/ChangeLog Works for me on i386. Same here. Patch for src_config_py isn't

UPDATE: net/gajim (0.11.1 = 0.11.2)

Changelog: * Improve idle, transports support * Enable ellipsization in roster and chatwindow * Fixed some metacontacts problems * Beter support of XEP-0070 (Verifying HTTP Requests via XMPP) * Make the same height of a banner for all chat tabs * Fix a bug with french translation and

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim (0.11.1 = 0.11.2)

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:47:40PM +0400, Vlad Glagolev wrote: Tested @ i386. Does anybody need gtkspell there?.. Yes, I think so. And it's not a real big dependecy, is it? What's that roster_window.py patch you added? -- simon

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim (0.11.1 = 0.11.2)

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:13:21 +0200 Simon Kuhnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:47:40PM +0400, Vlad Glagolev wrote: What's that roster_window.py patch you added? We don't have 'python' executable, if you know.. but we have python2.4 :) -- Cheerz, Vlad / Stelz

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim (0.11.1 = 0.11.2)

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 04:24:00PM +0400, Vlad Glagolev wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:13:21 +0200 Simon Kuhnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:47:40PM +0400, Vlad Glagolev wrote: What's that roster_window.py patch you added? We don't have 'python' executable, if

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim (0.11.1 = 0.11.2)

I forgot about adding aspell to WANTLIB again, sorry. New patch attached. Thanks viq! -- simon Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/gajim/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 Makefile --- Makefile 15 Sep 2007