On 2018/12/04 13:28, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Not sure how much you looked into this besides the 30 sec noted, but nothing
> requires py-pygfm in the ports tree for py2 or py3. The python markdown
> module has had a lot of improvements since 2015 (current version in the ports
>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:28:29PM +, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Not sure how much you looked into this besides the 30 sec noted, but nothing
> requires py-pygfm in the ports tree for py2 or py3. The python markdown
> module has had a lot of improvements since 2015 (current
Daniel,
Not sure how much you looked into this besides the 30 sec noted, but nothing
requires py-pygfm in the ports tree for py2 or py3. The python markdown module
has had a lot of improvements since 2015 (current version in the ports tree)
including cleaning up of dead code, improved testing,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:43:23 -0600, Edward Lopez-Acosta
wrote:
> textproc/py-pygfm is also dependant on this but already up to date so
> I see no issue.
Really? How much have you looked?
It took me less than 30 seconds to find one. I did
cd /usr/ports/textproc/py-pygfm/
make show=HOMEPAGE
Thanks, Edward! As you note, I’m no longer active, so ports@ make sense as
maintainer.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 16:43 Edward Lopez-Acosta
wrote:
> Version bump, 2.4.4 is over 3 years old at this point.
>
> Contacted maintainer who noted he can be dropped, CC for confirmation. I
> suggest this
Version bump, 2.4.4 is over 3 years old at this point.
Contacted maintainer who noted he can be dropped, CC for confirmation. I
suggest this stay with ports@ as the maintainer. textproc/py-pygfm is
also dependant on this but already up to date so I see no issue.
Primary consumer is
Version bump for an upcoming port I am working on.
Ok to merge?
Thank you,
--
Edward Lopez-Acosta
diff --git a/textproc/py-markdown/Makefile b/textproc/py-markdown/Makefile
index 71b470b19e3..c4299445887 100644
--- a/textproc/py-markdown/Makefile
+++ b/textproc/py-markdown/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7
