On Saturday 23 June 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:49:30AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > On Friday 22 June 2007, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > > Section #9 states:
> > > > "We recommend you place the license in
> > > > /usr/local/share/doc//."
> > > >
> > > > If you've alr
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:49:30AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > Section #9 states:
> > > "We recommend you place the license in
> > > /usr/local/share/doc//."
> > >
> > > If you've already have a /usr/local/share// directory for the
> > > applicati
On Friday 22 June 2007, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Section #9 states:
> > "We recommend you place the license in
> > /usr/local/share/doc//."
> >
> > If you've already have a /usr/local/share// directory for the
> > application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share//doc/
> > directory for misc st
> Section #9 states:
> "We recommend you place the license in /usr/local/share/doc//."
>
> If you've already have a /usr/local/share// directory for the
> application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share//doc/
> directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), is
> there
On Friday 22 June 2007 10:35:15 J.C. Roberts wrote:
> If you've already have a /usr/local/share// directory for the
> application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share//doc/
> directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), is
> there really any point in also creating the sug
Section #9 states:
"We recommend you place the license in /usr/local/share/doc//."
If you've already have a /usr/local/share// directory for the
application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share//doc/
directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), is
there really any poi
