Re: drop opencore-amr

2018-04-05 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
maintainer) >> > - do other pjsua users actually use AMR? I have never seen it used. >> > >> > If we drop opencore-amr from pjsua (pending), we can drop opencore-amr >> > altogether. I originally imported it to have it in SoX, because >> > my android rec

Re: drop opencore-amr

2018-04-05 Thread Jan Stary
ve never seen it used. > > > > If we drop opencore-amr from pjsua (pending), we can drop opencore-amr > > altogether. I originally imported it to have it in SoX, because > > my android recorded AMR by default back then. Tha't no longer true, > > and the whole codec is imho outd

Re: drop opencore-amr

2018-03-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/03/18 17:08, Jan Stary wrote: > audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination. > The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer) > - do other pjsua users actually use AMR? I have never seen it used. > > If we drop opencore-amr from pjsua (pendin

Re: drop opencore-amr

2018-03-18 Thread Jan Stary
On Mar 18 17:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote: > audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination. > The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer) Here are the other ports mentioning AMR, but not using opencore-amr - either explicitly disabling it, or using another

drop opencore-amr

2018-03-18 Thread Jan Stary
audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination. The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer) - do other pjsua users actually use AMR? I have never seen it used. If we drop opencore-amr from pjsua (pending), we can drop opencore-amr altogether. I originally imported

Re: drop opencore-amr from SoX

2018-03-17 Thread Jan Stary
On Mar 17 16:15:36, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > done sox/imagination. Thanks. > it might still be useful for pjsua though > so i'd be inclined to keep that. My real goal is to drop opencore-amr altogether, these are the individual steps to not use it. pjsua has no maintainer - do pj

drop opencore-amr from pjsua

2018-03-17 Thread Jan Stary
Tested on current/amd64 and current/macppc. Jan Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/telephony/pjsua/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -p -r1.43 Makefile --- Makefile5 Aug 2017 12:31:01 - 1.43 +++

drop opencore-amr from imagination

2018-03-17 Thread Jan Stary
This accompanies the removal of AMR from SoX: multimedia/imagination pulls the WANTLIB through the SoX dependency. Tested on current/amd64. Jan Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/multimedia/imagination/Makefile,v

drop opencore-amr from SoX

2018-03-17 Thread Jan Stary
OK, I'll try again. > > On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote: > > > A new version of opencore-amr is out since January. > > > Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it? > > > > > > Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX, > > > because AMR is what Android

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2018-03-17 Thread Mohamed Fouad
Ping On 17 Mar 2018 3:32 pm, "Jan Stary" wrote: > ping > > On Jan 28 09:08:24, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > ping > > > > On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > ping > > > > > > On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > > >

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2018-03-17 Thread Jan Stary
ping On Jan 28 09:08:24, h...@stare.cz wrote: > ping > > On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > ping > > > > On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile > > > > and removes

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2018-01-28 Thread Jan Stary
ping On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote: > ping > > On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile > > > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, > > > and

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-11-01 Thread Jan Stary
ping On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote: > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile > > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, > > and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something. >

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, > and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something. On Sep 20 13:11:38, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: >

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something. (The current multimedia/imagination mentions opencore-amr in WANTLIB but not in LIB_DEPENDS - is that

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/09/20 11:21, Jan Stary wrote: > On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected: > > > > * audio/opencore-amr (obviously) > > * audio/sox (handled below) > > * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer) > > * telephony/pjsua (no

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected: > > * audio/opencore-amr (obviously) > * audio/sox (handled below) > * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer) > * telephony/pjsua (no maintainer) > > These seem to _not_ be affected: >

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 15 08:36:42, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote: > > A new version of opencore-amr is out since January. > > Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it? > > > > Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX, > > because AMR is what

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote: > A new version of opencore-amr is out since January. > Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it? > > Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX, > because AMR is what Android recorded by default in its voice recorder. > That's