The following diff disconnects devel/jdk/1.7 from the build,
adjusts java.port.mk so that any ports previously built with
1.7 will now be built with 1.8 and bumps the revision on the
affected ports.
I have tested this on a partial bulk build on amd64 of all
ports touched in the diff.
Index
Hi,
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:03:26AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> > This updates devel/jdk/1.7 to u80. Tested on amd64 only.
> > u80 includes Java SE Critical Patch Updates.
> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u-relnotes-515228.html
> >
> > Looking
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 09:43 -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> This updates devel/jdk/1.7 to u80. Tested on amd64 only.
> u80 includes Java SE Critical Patch Updates.
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u-relnotes-515228.html
>
> Looking for testing on i386 and okays.
Upd
This updates devel/jdk/1.7 to u80. Tested on amd64 only.
u80 includes Java SE Critical Patch Updates.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u-relnotes-515228.html
Looking for testing on i386 and okays.
Thanks,
-Kurt
Index: Makefile
;> >
>> > Tested on amd64 with native_bootstrap and building all ports that
>> > require jdk/1.7 to build.
>>
>> Sorry, evolution word-wrapped the diff. Again as attachment.
>
> Updated diff. This adds a makefile target called build-bootjdk that
> we will
the bootjdk instead of
jdk/1.6 to build.
Thanks,
-Kurt
Index: Makefile
=======
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk/1.7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -p -r1.67 Makefile
--- Makefile 25 Nov 2013 14:16:22 - 1.67
+++ Makefile 29
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 05:10 -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Security update to u55. Remove patches included in upstream repository.
> Update cacerts.
>
> Tested on amd64 with native_bootstrap and building all ports that
> require jdk/1.7 to build.
Sorry, evolution word-wrapped the
Security update to u55. Remove patches included in upstream repository.
Update cacerts.
Tested on amd64 with native_bootstrap and building all ports that
require jdk/1.7 to build.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/10/30 15:33, David Coppa wrote:
>> So, tomcat now starts correctly:
>>
>> Oct 30, 2013 3:22:14 PM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
>> INFO: The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
>> perfo
On 2013/10/30 15:33, David Coppa wrote:
> So, tomcat now starts correctly:
>
> Oct 30, 2013 3:22:14 PM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
> INFO: The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
> performance in production environments was not found on the
> java.l
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 14:38 +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > I'm currently building jdk-1.7, I will report success/failure later
> > when it's done...
>
> Great. Thanks for tracking it down. The fix looks correct to me.
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 14:38 +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> I'm currently building jdk-1.7, I will report success/failure later
> when it's done...
Great. Thanks for tracking it down. The fix looks correct to me.
okay kurt@ after testing.
-Kurt
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk/1.7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.65 Makefile
--- Makefile16 Oct 2013 14:12:21 - 1.65
+++ Makefile30 Oct 2013 13:35:15 -
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ B=b11
PKGNAME= jdk-${V}
PKGNAME-main= jdk-${V}
PKGNAME-jre=
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk/1.7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.65 Makefile
--- Makefile16 Oct 2013 14:12:21 - 1.65
+++ Makefile30 Oct 2013 13:03:48 -
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ B=b11
PKGNAME= jdk-${V}
PKGNAME-main= jdk-${V}
PKGNAME-jre
ile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk/1.7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 Makefile
--- Makefile10 Apr 2013 02:49:05 - 1.63
+++ Makefile30 May 2013 14:49:19 -
@@ -5,17 +5,16 @@ ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64
COMMENT-m
Security update to u21. Remove patches included in upstream repository.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/jdk/1.7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 Makefile
--- Makefile10 Apr 2013 02:49:05 -
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:34:48PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Update jdk 1.7 to u9 level:
> - Update to u6 via patchset from upstream bsd_port and u6 source from Oracle
> - Copied u6 -> u9 patchset from FreeBSD/Greg Lewis's port
> - Updated classloader patch from Matt
Update jdk 1.7 to u9 level:
- Update to u6 via patchset from upstream bsd_port and u6 source from Oracle
- Copied u6 -> u9 patchset from FreeBSD/Greg Lewis's port
- Updated classloader patch from Matthew Dempsky (matthew@)
Tested on amd64 and i386. Please test in a bulk build.
Thank
On Thursday 08 September 2011 07:29:43 pm Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > Yes most of them were already upstream. I was mantaining them in both
> > places so
> > I could see how the bsd-port changes diverged from the linux code base as
> > the beta
> > moved along. The bsd-port tree is still separate fr
> Yes most of them were already upstream. I was mantaining them in both places
> so
> I could see how the bsd-port changes diverged from the linux code base as the
> beta
> moved along. The bsd-port tree is still separate from the main jdk codebase,
> although
> it looks like jdk8 will have bsd
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2011 05:03:25 pm Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Miller
>> wrote:
>> > Update devel/jdk/1.7 to b147 / non-beta
>> > - Remove Early Access now that jdk 1.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:29:00PM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Update devel/jdk/1.7 to b147 / non-beta
> - Remove Early Access now that jdk 1.7 is final
> - Use a patch set for all patches from upstream repository:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port
> - Remove n
On Thursday 08 September 2011 05:03:25 pm Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Miller
> wrote:
> > Update devel/jdk/1.7 to b147 / non-beta
> > - Remove Early Access now that jdk 1.7 is final
> > - Use a patch set for all patches from upstre
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Update devel/jdk/1.7 to b147 / non-beta
> - Remove Early Access now that jdk 1.7 is final
> - Use a patch set for all patches from upstream repository:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port
> - Remove native_bootstrap r
Long time user, first time email. My question is about the packages tree
rather than ports specifically.
I've been trying to figure out why in OpenBSD 4.7 packages/amd64 there is
no jdk 1.7, but there is a built .tgz jdk1.7 in packages/i386
And further, why did the snapshots/packages/
Hi guys
How many space I need to build the jdk 1.7 port?
I have the WRKOBJDIR pointing to a 2 GiB directory and it isn't enough.
Thanks all.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 16:27, Alexey Suslikov
wrote:
> Hello po...@.
>
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD localhost.my.domain 4.6 GENERIC.MP#120 amd64
>
> $ /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/bin/java -version
> openjdk version "1.7.0-internal"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-internal-robert_2009_08_08_14_04-b0
Hello po...@.
$ uname -a
OpenBSD localhost.my.domain 4.6 GENERIC.MP#120 amd64
$ /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/bin/java -version
openjdk version "1.7.0-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-internal-robert_2009_08_08_14_04-b00)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.0-b03, mixed mode)
$ cat Failu
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 09:49:07PM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> So if a user attempts to use jdk17_bootstrap without the package
> installed they will see this:
>
> $ FLAVOR=jdk17_bootstrap make install
> ===> jdk-1.6.0.03p7 is marked as broken: This flavor requires an
> installed 1.7 jdk package.
true ;;
.if ${FLAVOR:L:Mnative_bootstrap}
+INSTALLED!= (pkg_info -e "jdk->=1.6,<1.7" -q && echo yes) || echo no
+.if ${INSTALLED:L} != "yes"
+BROKEN += This flavor requires an installed 1.6 jdk package
+.endif
BUILD_DEPENDS+=:jdk->=1.6,<1.7:devel/jdk
solve?
I'm fairly certain Andres meant 'the 1.6 package'. There are probably
quite a few people who want 1.6 (probably because of better tool support
or the fact that it's extremely well-tested instead of 'Early Access').
It would be convenient if one could pkg_add jdk-1
(putting the quotes back in for context)
> On 2009/05/09 18:55, Andrés wrote:
> > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kurt Miller
> > wrote:
> > > On Saturday 02 May 2009 10:15:53 pm Andrés wrote:
> > >> Is it possible? FAQ says one can build 1.5 with Kaffe for native boot
> > >> strapping, but says
DEPENDS+=:jdk->=1.6,<1.7:devel/jdk/1.6
MAKE_ENV+= ALT_BOOTDIR="${LOCALBASE}/${JDKHOME}"
.else
+.if ${FLAVOR:L:Mjdk17_bootstrap}
+BUILD_DEPENDS+=:jdk->=1.7,<1.8:devel/jdk/1.7
+MAKE_ENV+= ALT_BOOTDIR="${LOCALBASE}/jdk-1.7.
I need the 1.7 package, not the port, so how the package is build is irrelevant.
On 2009/05/09 18:55, Andrés wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kurt Miller
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 May 2009 10:15:53 pm Andrés wrote:
> >> Is it possible? FAQ says one can build 1.5 with Kaffe for native boot
> >> strapping, but says nothing about 1.6.
> >
> > Kaffe currently can't buil
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Saturday 02 May 2009 10:15:53 pm Andrés wrote:
>> Is it possible? FAQ says one can build 1.5 with Kaffe for native boot
>> strapping, but says nothing about 1.6.
>
> Kaffe currently can't build 1.6. The version we have is just not up
> to the
On Saturday 02 May 2009 10:15:53 pm Andrés wrote:
> Is it possible? FAQ says one can build 1.5 with Kaffe for native boot
> strapping, but says nothing about 1.6.
Kaffe currently can't build 1.6. The version we have is just not up
to the task. 1.7 might be able to build 1.6. There are bootstrap
jd
Is it possible? FAQ says one can build 1.5 with Kaffe for native boot
strapping, but says nothing about 1.6.
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 3:29:09 pm macintoshzoom wrote:
> ... java guys are working very
> hard, and have the funds for, to patch their javas asap.
What funds? Please send them to me if you find any. ;-)
-Kurt
k it seems there is no problem with
jdk1.7.
Mac
Rajneesh N. Shetty wrote:
does that mean its ok to use it then?
tel : +61431 823 603
'Worry looks around, sorry looks back, faith looks up'.
--- On Sat, 16/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTE
does that mean its ok to use it then?
tel : +61431 823 603
'Worry looks around, sorry looks back, faith looks up'.
--- On Sat, 16/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: jdk 1.7 ?
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
'Dats what I'm talkin' bout! OpenBSD FTW!!
Brandon
--Original Message--
From: macintoshzoom
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
ReplyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 15, 2008 16:38
Subject: Re: jdk 1.7 ?
failed prt install but succeede
failed prt install but succeeded package!
jdk-1.7.0.00b24p2: complete
--- jdk-1.7.0.00b24p2 ---
You may wish to add /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/man to /etc/man.conf
macintoshzoom wrote:
Any of you guys has succeeded to build the jdk 1.7 port?
It was reported as broken some weeks ago
I just use the package.
Brandon
--Original Message--
From: macintoshzoom
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ports@openbsd.org
ReplyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 15, 2008 14:45
Subject: jdk 1.7 ?
Any of you guys has succeeded to build the jdk 1.7 port?
It was reported as broken some weeks ago
Any of you guys has succeeded to build the jdk 1.7 port?
It was reported as broken some weeks ago, is it okay now?
Mac.
This is just a random note that I had to bump the datasize limit
(ulimit -d) from previously 768 up to 896 MB on the i386 package
building machine in order to build devel/jdk/1.7.
We are getting closer and closer to the 1024 MB barrier.
--
Christian "naddy"
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:58:05AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Thanks for the report. I'll look into it.
>
> You can cd /usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.5 and 'make install' to get around
> the script problem.
No problem and thank you very much for the solution :-)
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Thanks for the report. I'll look into it.
You can cd /usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.5 and 'make install' to get around
the script problem.
-Kurt
I'm running OpenBSD -current with matching ports (kernel and userland
built a couple of days ago and ports tree updated today). When I try to
build the devel/jdk/1.7 port, I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.7$ sudo make
===> jdk-1.7.0.b19 depends on: j
49 matches
Mail list logo
