On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:30:39PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
anyway, i am fine with a monolithic texlive package, i am
sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
job Edd).
I have to admit first
2009/11/1 Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com:
2. Are you sure that you have to install TeXLive to begin with? I have
heard that lots of people who use ConTeXt have alternative method of
installing ConTeXt to Unix.
The ConTeXt minimals are self-contained and don't need TeXlive. They
are
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
anyway, i am fine with a monolithic texlive package, i am
sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
job Edd).
I have to admit first that due to the nature of my work I have to use
LaTeX and plain TeX. I
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:28:49AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
Did you look at texlive_base? It should be a rather solid base for your
work.
In fact, it might suffice to install texlive_base, untar the ConTeXt
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
anyway, i am fine with a monolithic texlive package, i am
sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
job Edd).
Basically, I don't have time to split all of TL down any further than
I already do. You
On 2009/10/29 02:16, frantisek holop wrote:
i am trying to put together a context minimals port,
which is basically a minimal tex distribution. it needs
pdftex, luatex, xetex, and other programs that do not
have standalone openbsd ports as i write this. they exist
in texlive but having
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:32:10AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
perhaps those parts of texlive could be subpackaged or split off...
it's good to try and find ways around conflicts, if anything else
starts to depend on them, they make things difficult for people using
the system,
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
This may be a stupid question, but why? TeXLive already includes
ConTeXt, and it should be possible to split ConTeXt from
texlive_texmf-full into its own package (texlive_texmf-context).
all the tex distributions have
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:38:36PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:32:10AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
perhaps those parts of texlive could be subpackaged or split off...
it's good to try and find ways around conflicts, if anything else
starts to
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
Did you look at texlive_base? It should be a rather solid base for your
work.
In fact, it might suffice to install texlive_base, untar the ConTeXt
files in /usr/local/share/texmf-local, and (re-)build the ls-R files.
hi there,
i am working on a package that is a collection of more
packages and other 3rd party files. it is analoguos
to a kde or gnome metapackage that basically just installs
all the application and their dependencies (libraries).
i am trying to put together a context minimals port,
which is
hello there,
some more info..
what this metaport is trying to do is quite simple
in theory:
fetch a
fetch b
fetch c
configure a
build a
configure b
build b
copy c
make package a_b_c-v1.0
would it be possible to divide this port up into subdirectories,
like
SUBDIR += a
SUBDIR
12 matches
Mail list logo
