Re: net/samba manpages are broken.

2011-02-17 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:57:18AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Pascal, > > Pascal Stumpf wrote on Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:58:17PM +0100: > > > dunno if you???re already aware of this, but it seems pretty much all of > > the manpages in net/samba are somewhat broken. Each one of them starts >

Re: net/samba manpages are broken.

2011-02-16 Thread Ian McWilliam
On 16/02/2011 8:03 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/02/16 01:57, Ingo Schwarze wrote: In the samba tarball, specifically, generated man(7) pages exist in two versions each, for example samba.7 and samba.7.crap. see /usr/ports/net/samba/Makefile; samba.7 is copied to samba.7.crap and then som

Re: net/samba manpages are broken.

2011-02-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/02/16 01:57, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > In the samba tarball, specifically, generated man(7) pages exist > in two versions each, for example samba.7 and samba.7.crap. see /usr/ports/net/samba/Makefile; samba.7 is copied to samba.7.crap and then some expressions that groff-1.15 can't handle are

Re: net/samba manpages are broken.

2011-02-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Pascal, Pascal Stumpf wrote on Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:58:17PM +0100: > dunno if you???re already aware of this, but it seems pretty much all of > the manpages in net/samba are somewhat broken. Each one of them starts > with three blank pages, so one has to hit space three times for the > actu

net/samba manpages are broken.

2011-02-15 Thread Pascal Stumpf
Hi ports@, dunno if you’re already aware of this, but it seems pretty much all of the manpages in net/samba are somewhat broken. Each one of them starts with three blank pages, so one has to hit space three times for the actual text to appear. Is that reproducable for anyone? Cheers, Pascal