Re: [macppc, probably ports-gcc] Unbreak devel/double-conversion (was: Re: new: devel/double-conversion)

2019-10-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/10/18 01:19, Charlene Wendling wrote: > That's why portcheck(1) yells if COMPILER_LIBCXX is in WANTLIB and > no COMPILER line with at least ports-gcc is set [0]. I added that check mainly to avoid pulling in multiple standard C++ libraries to the same address space (e.g. via library depend

Re: [macppc, probably ports-gcc] Unbreak devel/double-conversion (was: Re: new: devel/double-conversion)

2019-10-17 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:19:10AM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > - Drop Compiler, builds fine with all compilers. No C++11 > Yes, but there are platform-specific quirks that ports-gcc handles > gracefully, unlike the old base one ;) > That's why portcheck(1) yells if COMPILER_LIBCXX is in

[macppc, probably ports-gcc] Unbreak devel/double-conversion (was: Re: new: devel/double-conversion)

2019-10-17 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:52:49 +0200 Rafael Sadowski wrote: [...] > > Please find attached a re-write of your proposal. > > - move to math, devel to full and I see math is a better category. > - Drop do-test, cmake will handle it for use. > - Add WANTLIB > - Drop Compiler, builds fine with a

Re: new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/09/27 14:57, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > Please find attached a re-write of your proposal. > > > > - move to math, devel to full and I see math is a better category. > > - Drop do-test, cmake will handle it for use. > > - Add WANTLIB > > - Drop

Re: new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-27 Thread Paco Esteban
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Please find attached a re-write of your proposal. > > - move to math, devel to full and I see math is a better category. > - Drop do-test, cmake will handle it for use. > - Add WANTLIB > - Drop Compiler, builds fine with all compilers. No C++11 > > O

Re: new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-27 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Sep 27, 2019 at 01:52:49PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Sep 05, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > > Hi ports@, > > > > This is a new port for the double-conversion library: > > > > https://github.com/google/double-conversion > > > > It's needed for updating cad/ope

Re: new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-27 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Sep 05, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is a new port for the double-conversion library: > > https://github.com/google/double-conversion > > It's needed for updating cad/openscad to the last version (will send > a diff later for that) as a new dependenc

Re: new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-05 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Sep 05, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > This is a new port for the double-conversion library: > > https://github.com/google/double-conversion > > It's needed for updating cad/openscad to the last version (will send > a diff later for that) as a new dependenc

new: devel/double-conversion

2019-09-05 Thread Paco Esteban
Hi ports@, This is a new port for the double-conversion library: https://github.com/google/double-conversion It's needed for updating cad/openscad to the last version (will send a diff later for that) as a new dependency. This is my first ported library so, please, take a good look at it as it