On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:10:59AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> hmm, maybe the last changes to pkg_check-version didn't work quite right
> because I'd not expect the warning to trigger here:
>
> $ pkg_check-version xsd-4.1.0 xsd-4.1.0p0
> xsd-*- sorted: xsd-4.1.0 xsd-4.1.0p0
> WARNING:
On 2022/06/06 08:19, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sat Jun 04, 2022 at 10:48:28AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:35:39AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > The naming makes me thing this is a pre-4.1.0 alpha, so that at some
> > > point there might be a 4.1.0 release.
>
On Sat Jun 04, 2022 at 10:48:28AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:35:39AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > The naming makes me thing this is a pre-4.1.0 alpha, so that at some
> > point there might be a 4.1.0 release.
> >
> > $ pkg_check-version xsd-4.1.0.a11
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:35:39AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> The naming makes me thing this is a pre-4.1.0 alpha, so that at some
> point there might be a 4.1.0 release.
>
> $ pkg_check-version xsd-4.1.0.a11 xsd-4.1.0.a12 xsd-4.1.0
> xsd-*- sorted: xsd-4.1.0 xsd-4.1.0.a11 xsd-4.1.0.a12
On 2022/06/04 10:15, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 08:15:52AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Looks good but is .a11 a valid suffix? Will 4.2.0.a11 or xsd-4.1.0.a12
> > trigger an update?
>
> I changed PKGNAME and `make update' worked, so yes:
>
> Jun 4 11:57:23 eru pkg_add:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> test core dumped
As mentioned in my mail already...
> make test
> ===> Regression tests for xsd-4.1.0.a11
> find: -printf: unknown option
This one I only fixed in pre-install and the TDEP/BDEP was missing.
I've fixed that in my
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 08:15:52AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Looks good but is .a11 a valid suffix? Will 4.2.0.a11 or xsd-4.1.0.a12
> trigger an update?
I changed PKGNAME and `make update' worked, so yes:
Jun 4 11:57:23 eru pkg_add: Added xsd-4.1.0.a11->4.1.0.a12
Jun 4 12:14:56 eru
On Sun May 22, 2022 at 01:26:33AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Here's a new build dependency for my new libdigidocpp port, see ports@.
>
> Works fine on amd64, although tests currently fail with 'Abort trap' in
> gmake(1)... this port is using a bundled "build-0.3" program, which is a
>
On Sun May 22, 2022 at 01:26:33AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Here's a new build dependency for my new libdigidocpp port, see ports@.
>
> Works fine on amd64, although tests currently fail with 'Abort trap' in
> gmake(1)... this port is using a bundled "build-0.3" program, which is a
>
Here's a new build dependency for my new libdigidocpp port, see ports@.
Works fine on amd64, although tests currently fail with 'Abort trap' in
gmake(1)... this port is using a bundled "build-0.3" program, which is a
"massively-parallel build system implemented on top of GNU make".
Feedback? OK?
10 matches
Mail list logo
