another week, another build.
-f
--
programmers don't repeat themselves, they loop.
opera10.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 06:13:13PM -0400, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
You are probably right there, but on the other hand, someone
suggested that perhaps getting Opera distributed by default with the
Operating System would be enough motivation for them to make a port
of it. I don't know. I think
Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:39:58 -0400, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org
wrote:
i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd...
I wonder how many people would use it if there were a native build with a
proper license that would permit
--- On Sat, 6/27/09, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd...
I use Opera more instances (xauth).
I read it very sorry, that Linux compat and so Opera in this form has
not future. Can i receive a little bit more technical reason behind this?
I
On 2009/06/27 04:39, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:02:12PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell said
that
It would be nice to have Opera without the Linux baggage.
Who would I nag at Opera for this to be accomplished?
now before the release probably nobody :]
last
it's raining builds... build 4453 is here.
i have kept the other build numbers in the makefile
so it's easy to back if necessary.
regarding the comments:
opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change
of license or to go open source. if that is a showstopper for you,
It would take a lot more than change of license for
Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project.
Where does it say that the packages on CD must only be open-source?
I say so.
Is that enough?
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:14:51 -0400, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I say so.
Is that enough?
Yep.
--
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:00:48 -0400, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org
wrote:
opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change
of license or to go open source.
I do not think it is unreasonable to ask and to let a company, which
creates commercial software, to
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for your perspective.
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:39:51 -0400, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
Asking them to change license while also asking to provide binaries
for another OS is far too much in one go. Besides, adding a new OS
is just a technical and support
hmm, on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:02:12PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell said
that
It would be nice to have Opera without the Linux baggage.
Who would I nag at Opera for this to be accomplished?
now before the release probably nobody :]
last thing on their mind is to support more builds
when
hmm, on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:53:14AM +0530, Amarendra Godbole said that
Opera on smp locks-up, and this behavior seems to continue in v10
also. The archives has a lengthy discussion on this.
have you tried using a local proxy like tinyproxy?
-f
--
oxymoron: american english.
It would be nice to have Opera without the Linux baggage.
Who would I nag at Opera for this to be accomplished?
Thanks,
Dhu
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:12:48 +0200
frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
hi there,
the following is a (less then stellar) port of opera's
10b with unite.
this
hi there,
the following is a (less then stellar) port of opera's
10b with unite.
this port is _not_ an update for 9.64.
it makes a separate package called opera10 (not opera-*)
and installs everything mozilla style into /usr/local/opera10.
it is possible to install it alongside 9.64. it does
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:12 AM, frantisek holopmin...@obiit.org wrote:
hi there,
the following is a (less then stellar) port of opera's
10b with unite.
this port is _not_ an update for 9.64.
it makes a separate package called opera10 (not opera-*)
and installs everything mozilla style
hmm, on Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:19:34PM -0500, Brandon Mercer said that
Port installs fine... same stupidity that opera 9 exibits on an smp
machine. Tested on i386 only.
i am sorry, i dont use smp. what is that stupidity you are referring to?
-f
--
we must believe in free will. we have no
hmm, on Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:12:48PM +0200, frantisek holop said that
hi there,
the following is a (less then stellar) port of opera's
10b with unite.
build 4449, fresh from the owen.
the only change with the port: the build number is included
in the package name for easier
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:23 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:19:34PM -0500, Brandon Mercer said that
Port installs fine... same stupidity that opera 9 exibits on an smp
machine. Tested on i386 only.
i am sorry, i dont use smp. what is that
18 matches
Mail list logo
