Selon Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'll update the patch for SpamAssassin 3.1.7 that I sent to
the list yesterday. I don't think that we have to keep
these changes separate.
Here is a diff for spamassassin that :
- update to version 3.1.7 (by Andreas Vögele, with some cleanings)
- use
Selon Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like this, but I think a home directory of /var/spool/spamassassin
would make for less clutter in /var
I'm not sure about this. Most of the similar ports seem to use /var for this
kind of data (cyrus-imapd, clamav...).
--
Antoine
Hi.
Here's a diff that change the _spamdaemon user's home directory from
/nonexistent to /var/spamassassin (owned by _spamdaemon).
This way, one can start spamd as the _spamdaemon user and make use of
auto-whitelist, bayes... without error.
Without this patch you get errors like:
spamd[1987]:
Selon Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We might also use /var/spamassassin instead of /var/db/spamassassin
for the updated rules that sa-update downloads.
Indeed.
New diff attached.
What do you all think?
--
Antoine
spamassassin.diff
Description: Binary data
* Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061024 09:57]:
Selon Andreas V?gele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We might also use /var/spamassassin instead of /var/db/spamassassin
for the updated rules that sa-update downloads.
Indeed.
New diff attached.
What do you all think?
Should the _spamdaemon
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
Hi.
Here's a diff that change the _spamdaemon user's home directory from
/nonexistent to /var/spamassassin (owned by _spamdaemon). This way,
one can start spamd as the _spamdaemon user and make use of
auto-whitelist, bayes... without error.
[,,,]
Let me know!
David Krause writes:
* Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061024 09:57]:
Selon Andreas V?gele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We might also use /var/spamassassin instead of /var/db/spamassassin
for the updated rules that sa-update downloads.
Indeed.
New diff attached.
What do you all think?
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Andreas Vögele wrote:
Should the _spamdaemon user be able to the write to the updated rules
directory?
The updated rules are put into a subdirectory by sa-update,
e.g. /var/db/spamassassin/3.001007.
The _spamdaemon user doesn't need write access to that directory, only
Antoine Jacoutot [2006-10-24, 16:31:36]:
Selon Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We might also use /var/spamassassin instead of /var/db/spamassassin
for the updated rules that sa-update downloads.
Indeed.
New diff attached.
What do you all think?
--
Antoine
Index: Makefile
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi.
Here's a diff that change the _spamdaemon user's home directory from
/nonexistent to /var/spamassassin (owned by _spamdaemon).
This way, one can start spamd as the _spamdaemon user and make use of
auto-whitelist, bayes... without error.
I
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
So, should we commit this?
I'll update the patch for SpamAssassin 3.1.7 that I sent to
the list yesterday. I don't think that we have to keep
these changes separate.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Andreas Vögele wrote:
I'll update the patch for SpamAssassin 3.1.7 that I sent to
the list yesterday. I don't think that we have to keep
these changes separate.
Allright, I'll wait fo ryour patch then.
--
Antoine
12 matches
Mail list logo
