On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote:
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Same problem here too :
OpenBSD alex.test 5.5 GENERIC.MP#8 amd64
I
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote:
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
On 16.01.2014 10:15, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote:
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Long story:
I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local 5.5 GENERIC.MP#217
i386).
And I tried to update my ports too, via packages.
My mirror is
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Didn't you just forget to upgrade you base OS? 5.5 was tagged
couple of day ago.
jirib
On 2014/01/15 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Thanks for the report - fixed packages will be available in a bit.
On 2014/01/15 07:58, Jiri B wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Didn't you just forget to upgrade you base OS? 5.5 was tagged
On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Long story:
I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local 5.5
GENERIC.MP#217 i386).
And I tried to update my
On 2014/01/15 15:15, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Long story:
I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local
On 15.01.2014 15:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/01/15 15:15, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Long story:
I upgraded to (near)
Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote:
Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with
55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.
Same problem here too :
OpenBSD alex.test 5.5 GENERIC.MP#8 amd64
I fixed the amd64 packages last night (CET). The
11 matches
Mail list logo