Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-16 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote: Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Same problem here too : OpenBSD alex.test 5.5 GENERIC.MP#8 amd64 I

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-16 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote: Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg.

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-16 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 16.01.2014 10:15, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 15.01.2014 16:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote: Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but

packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Sébastien Marie
Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Long story: I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local 5.5 GENERIC.MP#217 i386). And I tried to update my ports too, via packages. My mirror is

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Jiri B
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Didn't you just forget to upgrade you base OS? 5.5 was tagged couple of day ago. jirib

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/01/15 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Thanks for the report - fixed packages will be available in a bit.

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/01/15 07:58, Jiri B wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Didn't you just forget to upgrade you base OS? 5.5 was tagged

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Long story: I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local 5.5 GENERIC.MP#217 i386). And I tried to update my

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/01/15 15:15, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Long story: I upgraded to (near) latest base system (OpenBSD bert.local

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 15.01.2014 15:33, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/01/15 15:15, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 15.01.2014 13:38, Sébastien Marie wrote: Hi, Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Long story: I upgraded to (near)

Re: packages snapshots signed with wrong key

2014-01-15 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote: Short story: the latest package snapshost (i386) is signed with 55pkg.pub, but the @signer in +CONTENTS is 54pkg. Same problem here too : OpenBSD alex.test 5.5 GENERIC.MP#8 amd64 I fixed the amd64 packages last night (CET). The