On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 07:54:37PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:34:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > Index: pkg/PLIST-synctex
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: pkg/PLIST-synctex
> > > diff -N
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:34:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > Index: pkg/PLIST-synctex
> > ===
> > RCS file: pkg/PLIST-synctex
> > diff -N pkg/PLIST-synctex
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
> >
On Mon, Feb 04 2019, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 12:25:55AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> > - In tex live, put synctex into its own subpackage and LIB_DEPEND it.
>> > - In tex live, move synctex into -mktexlsr. Evince already LIB_DEPENDS
>> > this.
>> > - Patch
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:41:18PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:41:18 +0100
> > Same diff from /usr/ports, easier to apply.
>
> Please ignore, this was just my mail client showing me the attachments
> as inlined, without any hint.
>
> Learn something
On Mon, Feb 04 2019, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
[...]
> Same diff from /usr/ports, easier to apply.
Please ignore, this was just my mail client showing me the attachments
as inlined, without any hint.
Learn something stupid everyday.
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF
On Mon, Feb 04 2019, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 12:25:55AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> > - In tex live, put synctex into its own subpackage and LIB_DEPEND it.
>> > - In tex live, move synctex into -mktexlsr. Evince already LIB_DEPENDS
>> > this.
>> > - Patch
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 12:25:55AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > - In tex live, put synctex into its own subpackage and LIB_DEPEND it.
> > - In tex live, move synctex into -mktexlsr. Evince already LIB_DEPENDS
> > this.
> > - Patch evince to always use its internal copy.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:49:56PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:07:15AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > I agree that it's not good for users to have to install a texmf subset
> > just to use evince. I'm OK with evince lib depending upon texlive-base
> > in the interim
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:07:15AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I agree that it's not good for users to have to install a texmf subset
> just to use evince. I'm OK with evince lib depending upon texlive-base
> in the interim until we decide what to do, but in the long term we don't
> want that
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 03:31:41AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> While here I've noticed complains about an ABI break in libsynctex.
>
> Please find an updated diff below that also bumps shlib version of
> libptexenc and libsynctex. Still ok?
Ah, please feel free to bump all of
On Thu, Jan 24 2019, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23 2019, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:16:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>> > First, this looks like synctex_version.h is missing from texlive_base,
>>> > which should be fixed
On Wed, Jan 23 2019, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:16:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> > First, this looks like synctex_version.h is missing from texlive_base,
>> > which should be fixed anyway.
>>
>> Here's a patch to address this, similar to what
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:16:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > First, this looks like synctex_version.h is missing from texlive_base,
> > which should be fixed anyway.
>
> Here's a patch to address this, similar to what debian did:
>
>
>
On Wed, Jan 23 2019, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:54:02AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> FWIW, I just did a manual "make build" in graphics/evince, which resulted in:
>>
>> ```
>> In file included from ev-document.c:29:
>>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:11:28PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:54:02AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > FWIW, I just did a manual "make build" in graphics/evince, which resulted
> > in:
> >
> > ```
> > In file included from ev-document.c:29:
> >
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:11:28PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> I guess we don't want evince to lib-depend on texlive_base, but I didn't
> find an autoconf knob for enforcing the internal synctex.
Ignore that part. I forgot that evince already run-depends on
texlive_base ;-)
Ciao,
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:54:02AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> FWIW, I just did a manual "make build" in graphics/evince, which resulted in:
>
> ```
> In file included from ev-document.c:29:
> /usr/local/include/synctex/synctex_parser.h:53:10: fatal error:
> 'synctex_version.h' file not
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:38:30AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Might be dpb junking?
FWIW, I just did a manual "make build" in graphics/evince, which resulted in:
```
In file included from ev-document.c:29:
/usr/local/include/synctex/synctex_parser.h:53:10: fatal error:
'synctex_version.h'
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:43:18AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> (putting this back to ports@, because i don't like discussions on
> ports-changes@)
>=20
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:01:12AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 04:17:54AM -0700, Edd Barrett
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:43:18AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> This iw weird. When I tested edd's diff for texlive-2018, I also
> removed all ports depending on it from my package repository,
> including evince. And it did not fail, and I got proper evince
> package (buit *after*
Hi,
(putting this back to ports@, because i don't like discussions on
ports-changes@)
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:01:12AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 04:17:54AM -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > CVSROOT:/cvs
> > Module name:ports
> > Changes by:
21 matches
Mail list logo
