Re: libc++ 10.0: editors/libreoffice

2021-01-10 Thread Robert Nagy
sure On 11/01/21 00:27 +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Here is some black magic extracted from upstream that fixes building > editors/libreoffice with libc++ 10.0, at least on amd64. > > https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/cc5a6c6afeed1d2cf76d288133971d29ee8d893e > > ok? > > Index:

Re: netsurf/browser: .desktop exec entry is wrong

2021-01-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:23:59AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > $ xdg-settings set default-web-browser netsurf.desktop > which: netsurf-gtk: Command not found. > readlink: : No such file or directory > > It has been forgotten since the www/netsurf transition to gtk3. > > The below diff fixes

libc++ 10.0: editors/libreoffice

2021-01-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Here is some black magic extracted from upstream that fixes building editors/libreoffice with libc++ 10.0, at least on amd64. https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/cc5a6c6afeed1d2cf76d288133971d29ee8d893e ok? Index: Makefile ==

netsurf/browser: .desktop exec entry is wrong

2021-01-10 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, $ xdg-settings set default-web-browser netsurf.desktop which: netsurf-gtk: Command not found. readlink: : No such file or directory It has been forgotten since the www/netsurf transition to gtk3. The below diff fixes the issue. OK? Charlène. Index: Makefile =

Re: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] www/zola-0.13.0

2021-01-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/01/10 21:40, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/01/10 12:08, Peter Ezetta wrote: > > Hello ports@ > > > > Attached is an update to www/zola bringing it to version 0.13.0. > > > > Changelog: > > > > https://github.com/getzola/zola/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#0130-2021-01-09 > > > > Had to up

Re: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] www/zola-0.13.0

2021-01-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/01/10 12:08, Peter Ezetta wrote: > Hello ports@ > > Attached is an update to www/zola bringing it to version 0.13.0. > > Changelog: > > https://github.com/getzola/zola/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#0130-2021-01-09 > > Had to update the test-case crate to v1.1.0, as it was previously tied to

Re: [sparc64/base-gcc] Fix build of x11/gnome/gucharmap

2021-01-10 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Sure. — Antoine > On 10 Jan 2021, at 19:38, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > gucharmap uses C11 constructs so it needs to use ports-gcc on base-gcc > arches. > > ok? > > --Kurt > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/g

Re: [update] archivers/gtar 1.32 ->1.33

2021-01-10 Thread Stefan Hagen
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Stefan Hagen: >> portcheck, make port-lib-depends-check: ok >> make test: >> amd64 - up to test 165 all good, then I ran out of disk space >> sparc64 - passed > > Well, I get: > > 89: extracting even when . and .. are unreadableFAILED (extrac09.at:37) Shame

Re: bsd.port.mk: add .rpm to EXTRACT_CASES

2021-01-10 Thread Robert Nagy
On 09/01/21 22:50 +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 10:38:36PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > Coming from sysutils/mdprint I want ordinary distfiles handling. > > Since we have more than one port using RPM files, here is a straight > > forward diff to unify each of their quirky

Re: [NEW] graphics/opensubdiv

2021-01-10 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Jan 09, 2021 at 07:15:36PM +, Dimitri Karamazov wrote: > Ping Port-wise it looks good to me. If someone wants to import this, ok rsadowski@

[sparc64/base-gcc] Fix build of x11/gnome/gucharmap

2021-01-10 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
gucharmap uses C11 constructs so it needs to use ports-gcc on base-gcc arches. ok? --Kurt Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/gnome/gucharmap/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.129 diff -u -p -r1.129 Makefile --- Makefile

Re: conflicts in ports.tar.gz

2021-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 15:23:25, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > The generated ports.tar.gz is broken, it misses CVS/Entries listings > for various directories. Thank you. This also explains a detail I foolishly left out: ? textproc/py-demjson ? www/py-waitress ? www/sass ? www/tor-browser etc So the dirs are

Re: conflicts in ports.tar.gz

2021-01-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
The generated ports.tar.gz is broken, it misses CVS/Entries listings for various directories. No idea why but I would suggest ignoring ports.tar.gz and just fetching from anoncvs, either directly, or from a local repo mirrored by reposync. On 2021/01/10 15:53, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jan 09 13:41:0

Re: conflicts in ports.tar.gz

2021-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 09 13:41:07, h...@stare.cz wrote: > The current ports.tar.gz contains files that 'cvs up' > considers to be in conflict. For example, untaring > snapshots/ports.tar.gz and running > > cvs -q -d anon...@mirror.osn.de:/cvs up -PdA > > on to of that gives > > C x11/paper-icon-theme/disti

Re: dev and deve and devel

2021-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 09 23:15:07, na...@mips.inka.de wrote: > On 2021-01-09, Jan Stary wrote: > > > The current ports.tar.gz contains a dev/ and deve/ directory > > beside the expected devel/ category. Is that intended? > > The creation of those directories wasn't intended as such, they're > the result of cvs

Re: update arm-trusted-firmware to 2.4

2021-01-10 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:42:31PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 11:48 -0500, Kurt Miller wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:27 +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 04:29:35PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2020-12-31 at