On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Stuart,
First, I have to thank you for being so patient and complete with the
information,and understand the issue with the Nagios version in Ports,
the changes that would be required to make that work with 5.7, and also
your justifiable switch to
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > Ports is a thankless job. I guess there are way more (most probably paid?)
> > volunteers in Linux who maintain nagios.
>
Not necessarily - the codebase is exactly the same - compiling on 5.7
throws the errors previously mentioned, .. building on a
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Not saying he is, .. the question is why the codebase complies just fine
> > on both 64 & 32 bit Linux systems, but not OBSD. If there were a way to
> > divine that secret sauce, would it not help others?
>
> Yes. So go divine it, get going at it
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> OpenBSD is essentially just a research project.
>
> It is completely unsuitable for use by "scientists" who demand we
> change it for them.
>
> Lee, I think you should go.
>
Why? I don't do anything a lunatic tells me, .. besides, you're too
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Even if that is the case, it gives you NO RIGHT to keep pushing for
> developers to fix shit for you.
>
Well, .. if you would stop ranting long enough to actually READ the emails
I have sent, you might actually discover the words therein, .. and if you
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> When you pick a fight with one open source project, it may lead
> people to believe you have other bad business practices.
>
Sorry, .. you picked the fight, not me - better get your story straight.
> Stuart said he didn't want to help you -- for free.
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> AFAIK, Linux uses 'long' for time_t, like we used to. This is
> 32 bits on 32-bit platforms and 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and
> matches the %lu format strings.
>
> Background etc. in http://www.openbsd.org/papers/eurobsdcon_2013_time_t/
>
Stuart,
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Apparently your expertise is begging for help on open source
> mailing lists, and then insulting us when we say no, we won't
> help do your job for you.
>
Ahh, .. I wasn't begging, better check your sources. I was trying to help
- if you don't want help,
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> FYI sluug,
>
> Lee has been on our mailing lists arguing with people who don't
> want to do his work for him.
>
> Such discourse from a member of your community towards open source
> groups is not acceptable.
>
> Lee, you tell me when I should stop being
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I still encourage you to stop using OpenBSD. It's pretty clear
> noone here is going to go out of their way to help you. So I mean,
> why continue asking/begging/demanding, and suggesting that people
> here are lazy or lunatic?
>
Huh? You've been
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Do you want to give back the money we have contributed? Refund the cost of
> > the CDs we have on the shelf since, what, 3.1?
>
> Are you being serious here?
>
> I give you some money, and you'll leave?
>
Well, .. that's what you were proposing, ..
>
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > Do you want to give back the money we have contributed? Refund the cost
> > > > of
> > > > the CDs we have on the shelf since, what, 3.1?
> > >
> > > Are you being serious here?
> > >
> > > I give you some money, and you'll leave?
> > >
> > Well,
OK, .. the nagios version in ports is AMD only, fine. If one DOES need
i386 can it not be built from source:
# make all
cd ./base && make
make -C ../lib
Using $< in a non-suffix rule context is a GNUmake idiom (Makefile:157)
*** Error 2 in /usr/src/nagioscore (Makefile:71 'all')
Inquiring minds
We have a project wants to use the 1.6JDK [in addition to JDK1.7] on
the 4.6 server they have, .. tried to build it from the port, and it
wanted openmotif; installed openmotif-2.3.0p0 successfully, but it
did not resolve the dependency.
Do we need a different openmotif package ir? Don't
At 04:20 PM 5/12/2009 -0500, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Why don't you use packages?
Is there an easy way to do this?
Try your own variation of:
export PKG_PATH=ftp://your favorite mirror/pub/OpenBSD/`uname -a
Trying to run a Mongrel cluster behind an ssl connection, .. the best seems
seems to be proxy balancer, but that isn't available in the mod_proxy for
1.3. Is there any chance balancer functionality might be a worhwhile
addition to the 1.3 mod_proxy, or the only option to migrate to apache2?
At 12:32 AM 7/24/2008 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
Hello,
This is my first port submission. I chose a simple one; it's a ruby gem.
Can someone please review it, offer feedback, and commit it?
Why would you wish to use a OBSD port instead of the standard gem
installation sources?
Lee
At 02:27 PM 7/17/2008 +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
[Mailing list changed to ports@, where this belongs.]
Confirmed.
The package has been *split*. There's, for example on my system,
git-1.5.6.1, which does *NOT* require X at all, git-svn-1.5.6.1 (does
*NOT* require X either), and
At 10:06 AM 5/28/2008 -0500, C. Bensend wrote:
Hey folks,
I sent this to MAINTAINER, but never heard back, I'm sure he's
busy as hell.
You might wish to use rsnapshot instead - having the server pull data from
the client eliminates issues with root login privledges.
Lee
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Floor Terra wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Ian McWilliam wrote:
I haven't read the Adobe PDF sepc or standard and have no intention to. It
looks like no body here wants to either. I find that puzzling seeing.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ports@openbsd.org/msg16457.html
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Andrés wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
text.
This kills it. ok?
Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
At 08:22 PM 2/3/2008 +, Simon H wrote:
Hi all
I recently inherited an old php/mysql app which I have migrated onto
OpenBSD 4.2 with the latest MySQL/PHP packages and modules.
I installed the mod_auth_mysql package after realizing the app did
basic auth with this backend and when trying to
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/14 16:49, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Posted to ports-bugs, .. but nobody caught it.
TBH, I never noticed that list before. Most ports discussion is
on ports@ (cc'd and reply-to set) or with the relevant maintainer
(see the output from
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:11:47PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
I would think the port was dropped because there was no need for it.
Webmin is simply a bunch of Perl scripts, they install just fine from the
webmin site.
I think the commit
24 matches
Mail list logo
