Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:56:37PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks for doing it. I would have liked to see xfce4-battery in the main package because it's the only app I use from extras. But otoh, before looking at the exact contents, my feeling was why bother with an -extras subpackage? just put everything into the main one. So do as you think it's the best. -- Matthieu Herrb
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:56:37PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks for doing it. I would have liked to see xfce4-battery in the main package because it's the only app I use from extras. Yeah, but it's not really useful on desktop computers... that's also why i didn't put xfce4-power-manager in either of them. Likewise, i didn't put x11/gigolo nor gvfs-samba, because not everyone uses GVfs... and i didn't put xfprint, because not everyone kills trees :) But otoh, before looking at the exact contents, my feeling was why bother with an -extras subpackage? just put everything into the main one. If i did that, i'm pretty sure i'd get complaints :) I've looked at what other oses do, and most of them separate core/base from goodies, with a somewhat similar separation. Landry
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:29:03 +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:16:26 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2012/02/28 23:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:56:37 +0100, Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks a lot for the meta port. # make fetch The licensing info for is incomplete. (in meta/xfce) Please notify the OpenBSD port maintainer: (in meta/xfce) Landry Breuil lan...@openbsd.org (in meta/xfce) Fatal: CATEGORIES is mandatory. (in meta/xfce) *** Error code 1 Stop. # pwd /usr/ports/mystuff/meta/xfce The meta ports pull in ../Makefile.inc, either untar directly in /usr/ports/meta/xfce or symlink it Oh, sorry. Thanks. Works OK. Sorry for the delay but... too many dependencies for my little netbook! :) Cheers. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
[new] meta/xfce
Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Landry meta-xfce.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On 02/28/12 18:56, Landry Breuil wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. gnome-extras meta port has been renamed in gnome-extra, should we do the same for xfce ? Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. IMHO orage could go to -extras, in Makefile there is a line: # x11/xfce4/xfce4-icon-theme (outdated) xfce4-icon-theme is needed by Thunar, why is it outdated ? Cheers Giovanni
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:44:05PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 02/28/12 18:56, Landry Breuil wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. gnome-extras meta port has been renamed in gnome-extra, should we do the same for xfce ? -extraS make more sense to me,and i'd like my bike painted in blue :) Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. IMHO orage could go to -extras, in Makefile there is a line: # x11/xfce4/xfce4-icon-theme (outdated) xfce4-icon-theme is needed by Thunar, why is it outdated ? The dep should be dropped, icon theme didn't got a release since 4.4 5 years ago, and it's not icon-naming-spec compliant... Landry
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:56:37 +0100, Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks a lot for the meta port. # make fetch The licensing info for is incomplete. (in meta/xfce) Please notify the OpenBSD port maintainer: (in meta/xfce) Landry Breuil lan...@openbsd.org (in meta/xfce) Fatal: CATEGORIES is mandatory. (in meta/xfce) *** Error code 1 Stop. # pwd /usr/ports/mystuff/meta/xfce -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On 2012/02/28 23:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:56:37 +0100, Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks a lot for the meta port. # make fetch The licensing info for is incomplete. (in meta/xfce) Please notify the OpenBSD port maintainer: (in meta/xfce) Landry Breuil lan...@openbsd.org (in meta/xfce) Fatal: CATEGORIES is mandatory. (in meta/xfce) *** Error code 1 Stop. # pwd /usr/ports/mystuff/meta/xfce The meta ports pull in ../Makefile.inc, either untar directly in /usr/ports/meta/xfce or symlink it
Re: [new] meta/xfce
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:16:26 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2012/02/28 23:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:56:37 +0100, Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net wrote: Hi, it's been requested a few times, here's an xfce meta port to untar under ports/meta, splitted into -main and -extras as it's done with gnome meta port. Comments on what's shipped/separation between main and extras welcome, feedback welcome too. Thanks a lot for the meta port. # make fetch The licensing info for is incomplete. (in meta/xfce) Please notify the OpenBSD port maintainer: (in meta/xfce) Landry Breuil lan...@openbsd.org (in meta/xfce) Fatal: CATEGORIES is mandatory. (in meta/xfce) *** Error code 1 Stop. # pwd /usr/ports/mystuff/meta/xfce The meta ports pull in ../Makefile.inc, either untar directly in /usr/ports/meta/xfce or symlink it Oh, sorry. Thanks. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
