Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen, devel/doxygen-gui

2018-01-14 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Any objections? On Mon Jan 01, 2018 at 03:21:37PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All, > > please find below a simple diff to update doxygen. There are a three > notables changes: > > - Remove the DOXYGEN_ENCODE_PATH_STRIP hack diff. No port uses it anymore > - Change MAINTAINER email

UPDATE: devel/doxygen, devel/doxygen-gui

2018-01-01 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All, please find below a simple diff to update doxygen. There are a three notables changes: - Remove the DOXYGEN_ENCODE_PATH_STRIP hack diff. No port uses it anymore - Change MAINTAINER email address - CONFIGURE_ARGS and BUILD_DEPENDS tweaks The only one consumer opencv builds fine and

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen and devel/doxygen-gui

2017-04-05 Thread Rafael Sadowski
*ping* On Sat Mar 25, 2017 at 09:06:35AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All, > > straightforward update to the last doxygen version. After all > problematic doxygen ports have been modified, the doxygen update is > ready. The following ports still use it but there are no PLIST changes: > >

UPDATE: devel/doxygen and devel/doxygen-gui

2017-03-25 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All, straightforward update to the last doxygen version. After all problematic doxygen ports have been modified, the doxygen update is ready. The following ports still use it but there are no PLIST changes: astro/stellarium audio/liblo audio/libnjb databases/soprano devel/simulavr devel/tclap

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-14 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 11/13/16 22:54, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > >> Stuart Henderson writes: > > [...] > >>> 3. split the gui off to a different port. keep the same pkgname stem, >>> so it just needs an @pkgpath in PLIST for

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-13 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > Stuart Henderson writes: [...] >> 3. split the gui off to a different port. keep the same pkgname stem, >> so it just needs an @pkgpath in PLIST for updates to work. > > I'd prefer this option. In the meantime, let's

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-13 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2016/11/13 21:26, Nigel Taylor wrote: >> > >> I will not be able to test building that for sometime as in middle of >> dpb run, I would say that it will fail. Not proved, but the estdc++ in >> the wantlib requires the library to be installed,

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/11/13 21:26, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > > I will not be able to test building that for sometime as in middle of > dpb run, I would say that it will fail. Not proved, but the estdc++ in > the wantlib requires the library to be installed, that requires a > dependency set by x11/qt5.port.mk, >

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-13 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 11/13/16 19:50, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sat Nov 12, 2016 at 11:17:18PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> Nigel Taylor writes: >> >>> On 10/22/16 16:42, Rafael Sadowski wrote: On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-12 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Nigel Taylor writes: > On 10/22/16 16:42, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd >>> rather disable doxygen in those ports.. >>> >> >> Other

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-12 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 10/22/16 16:42, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd >> rather disable doxygen in those ports.. >> > > Other opinions or agreements? > I don't build qt5/kde4/kde5 for

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/11/10 11:31, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Rafael Sadowski writes: > > > On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd > >> rather disable doxygen in those ports.. > >>

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-11-10 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Rafael Sadowski writes: > On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd >> rather disable doxygen in those ports.. >> > > Other opinions or agreements? I propose that we first see

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-10-22 Thread Donovan Watteau
Hi, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd >> rather disable doxygen in those ports.. >> > > Other opinions or agreements? Doxygen breaks very often on mips64, and AFAICT

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-10-22 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Tue Sep 20, 2016 at 01:33:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd > rather disable doxygen in those ports.. > Other opinions or agreements? > > > On 2016/09/19 21:38, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > > > updated

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-09-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
These plist changes for every update are getting silly, I think I'd rather disable doxygen in those ports.. On 2016/09/19 21:38, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi ports@ > > updated again. Doxygen port changes: > > - Switch to qt5 > -- Build doxyapp, doxyindexer applications (Tested @amd64) > -

UPDATE: devel/doxygen

2016-09-19 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi ports@ updated again. Doxygen port changes: - Switch to qt5 -- Build doxyapp, doxyindexer applications (Tested @amd64) - Some patches are no longer needed (committed upstream) - Take Maintainer I checked all ports with doxygen usage: devel/libmtpREVISION bump and updated

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2016-01-18 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Dec 10, 2015 at 10:24:35PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/12/10 22:39, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Thu Dec 10, 2015 at 10:01:46AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > > > >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > > > > >> -

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-23 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Hi, Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2015/12/10 22:39, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> On Thu Dec 10, 2015 at 10:01:46AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: >> > > >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 >> > > >> - Use MD5Data()

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > >> - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString > > What is the point with those two items? This adds clutter to this > update and possible problems for the following ones. These changes are

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/12/10 22:39, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Dec 10, 2015 at 10:01:46AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > > >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > > > >> - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString > > > > > > What is the

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-10 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Dec 10, 2015 at 10:01:46AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > > >> - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString > > > > What is the point with those two items? This adds clutter to this

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-10 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2015/12/09 19:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: >> >> - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 >> >> - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString >> >> What is the point with those two items? This adds clutter to this >> update and possible

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-09 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Rafael Sadowski writes: > Hi @ports, Hi Rafael, > nobody cares *ping* harder ;-) This is the correct method indeed. :) > Cheers, Rafael > > On Sun Nov 22, 2015 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> Hi ports@ >> >> after my first attempt here is the new diff

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-12-07 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi @ports, nobody cares *ping* harder ;-) Cheers, Rafael On Sun Nov 22, 2015 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi ports@ > > after my first attempt here is the new diff to update doxygen. > > doxygen port highlights: > > - switch to CMake > - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > -

Re: UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-11-23 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Nov 22, 2015 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi ports@ > > after my first attempt here is the new diff to update doxygen. > > doxygen port highlights: > > - switch to CMake > - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 > - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString > > I

UPDATE: devel/doxygen 1.8.2 -> 1.8.10

2015-11-22 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi ports@ after my first attempt here is the new diff to update doxygen. doxygen port highlights: - switch to CMake - Don't use own libmd5 but base md5 - Use MD5Data() instead of MD5Buffer+MD5SigToString I checked all ports with doxygen usage. - No changes with 1.8.10: audio/liblo