Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-25 Thread Pascal Stumpf 
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:05:36 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas  wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 15 2017, Pascal Stumpf  wrote:
> >> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> >> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> >> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
> >>
> >> ok?
> >
> > Looks fine ports-wise, ok jca@
> 
> Too quick, the info page isn't properly uninstalled:
> 
>   ===>  Cleaning for gas-2.28
>   ===> Deinstalling for gas-2.28
>   install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/local/info/gas.info'; 
> nothing deleted
>   gas-2.28: ok
> 
> Patch attached which internally renames "as" to "gas" in the info page,
> to match the name of the installed file.

Updated tarball.


>>> application/octet-stream attachment, name=patch-gas_doc_as_info
> 
> -- 
> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
> 


gas.tgz
Description: gas.tgz

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas 
On Tue, Jul 25 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas  wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15 2017, Pascal Stumpf  wrote:
>> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
>> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
>> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
>>
>> ok?
>
> Looks fine ports-wise, ok jca@

Too quick, the info page isn't properly uninstalled:

  ===>  Cleaning for gas-2.28
  ===> Deinstalling for gas-2.28
  install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/local/info/gas.info'; 
nothing deleted
  gas-2.28: ok

Patch attached which internally renames "as" to "gas" in the info page,
to match the name of the installed file.



patch-gas_doc_as_info
Description: Binary data

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas 
On Sat, Jul 15 2017, Pascal Stumpf  wrote:
> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
>
> ok?

Looks fine ports-wise, ok jca@

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-16 Thread Pascal Stumpf 
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:15:59 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/07/16 13:35, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stuart Henderson  
> > wrote:
> > > On 2017/07/15 16:37, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > >> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> > >> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> > >> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
> > >>
> > >> ok?
> > >
> > > Is this needed when we have gas in arm-none-eabi-binutils? (kettenis has
> > > an update pending if this just needs a newer version).
> > 
> > I think so, since arm-none-eabi is probably just for AArch32 and also
> 
> It's not just for aarch32, there's an aarch64 flavour.
> 
> > specifically bare metal development, while what Pascal Stumpf provides
> > is gas for aarch64-openbsd platform. IIRC binutils are always compiled
> > for specific ABI and you can't simply retarget based on some command
> > line options (except in very specific cases on specific variant of one
> > platform).
> > 
> 
> On 2017/07/16 14:07, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > Hmm, I think I'd consider that abuse of a port that was originally
> > intended for cross-development, not everyday consumption by a "regular"
> > toolchain.
> 
> Fair enough.. I'm just trying to keep a lid on the number of different
> binutils-based ports that we have.
> 
> > Also, we'll need this port anyway as soon as other
> > architectures switch to clang.
> 
> Better to remove the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS then (also we won't notice if it's
> broken unless it's enabled for an arch which we routinely build packages
> for, aarch64 isn't stable enough for that yet)
> 

Okay, but then the info page conflicts with base.  Do we not care or
rename everything to "eas"/"egas"?

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-16 Thread Stuart Henderson 
On 2017/07/16 13:35, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stuart Henderson  
> wrote:
> > On 2017/07/15 16:37, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> >> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> >> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> >> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
> >>
> >> ok?
> >
> > Is this needed when we have gas in arm-none-eabi-binutils? (kettenis has
> > an update pending if this just needs a newer version).
> 
> I think so, since arm-none-eabi is probably just for AArch32 and also

It's not just for aarch32, there's an aarch64 flavour.

> specifically bare metal development, while what Pascal Stumpf provides
> is gas for aarch64-openbsd platform. IIRC binutils are always compiled
> for specific ABI and you can't simply retarget based on some command
> line options (except in very specific cases on specific variant of one
> platform).
> 

On 2017/07/16 14:07, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Hmm, I think I'd consider that abuse of a port that was originally
> intended for cross-development, not everyday consumption by a "regular"
> toolchain.

Fair enough.. I'm just trying to keep a lid on the number of different
binutils-based ports that we have.

> Also, we'll need this port anyway as soon as other
> architectures switch to clang.

Better to remove the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS then (also we won't notice if it's
broken unless it's enabled for an arch which we routinely build packages
for, aarch64 isn't stable enough for that yet)

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-16 Thread Pascal Stumpf 
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 10:50:32 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 16:37, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> > moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> > GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
> > 
> > ok?
> 
> Is this needed when we have gas in arm-none-eabi-binutils? (kettenis has
> an update pending if this just needs a newer version).
> 

Hmm, I think I'd consider that abuse of a port that was originally
intended for cross-development, not everyday consumption by a "regular"
toolchain.  Also, we'll need this port anyway as soon as other
architectures switch to clang.

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-16 Thread Karel Gardas 
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stuart Henderson  wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 16:37, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
>> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
>> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
>>
>> ok?
>
> Is this needed when we have gas in arm-none-eabi-binutils? (kettenis has
> an update pending if this just needs a newer version).

I think so, since arm-none-eabi is probably just for AArch32 and also
specifically bare metal development, while what Pascal Stumpf provides
is gas for aarch64-openbsd platform. IIRC binutils are always compiled
for specific ABI and you can't simply retarget based on some command
line options (except in very specific cases on specific variant of one
platform).

Re: [new] devel/gas

2017-07-16 Thread Stuart Henderson 
On 2017/07/15 16:37, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
> moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
> GCC 7 port on Aarch64.
> 
> ok?

Is this needed when we have gas in arm-none-eabi-binutils? (kettenis has
an update pending if this just needs a newer version).

[new] devel/gas

2017-07-15 Thread Pascal Stumpf 
This is a port of the latest version of GAS from GNU binutils, at the
moment for the sole purpose of providing an assembler for the upcoming
GCC 7 port on Aarch64.

ok?


gas.tgz
Description: gas.tgz