Bump on this one from 2015.
My previous response is in
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=145026410228199=4 .
The primary usecase for BitcoinD is to run a fully synced node.
That requires no DB4 at all, and LibreSSL works out of the box, and I
did the updating work already.
Now
1)
I think this needs some serious work, at least an updated
databases/db/v4 and some solution to that ugly LibreSSL problem.
I'm not really using this in any way, so I won't spend that kind of
effort on it.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:26:04 +0800, poweru...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What do
Pascal,
I wish to make a very strong point that these are non-problems!
Because, the dependency issues you mention don't really exist, and,
BitcoinD works perfectly on OpenBSD already.
For this reason I suggest that OpenBSD is included into the ports tree!
Berkeley DB is used for the wallet
On 2015-12-16 19:04, poweru...@openmailbox.org wrote:
..
For this reason I suggest that OpenBSD is included into the ports tree!
Err - for this reason I suggest that *BitcoinD* is included into the
ports tree.
That it's precompiled with "--disable-wallet" is all fine. If anyone
wants to
Guys,
What do you say, do you feel this is a relevant port?
Sorry for not being able to do this myself -
If you need any extra clear feedback or instructions from me for how to
actually build it, so that you can get the port together, I will be
happy to guide you, if so let me know.
What
Hi!
I don't know exactly how the port system works.
I figured out exactly how to get BitcoinD latest to build, by manually
patching the openbsd-wip bitcoind port, which is 2.5 years old.
I failed to actually get the port updated, on a stupid detail of the
port Makefile though, it was
(
Well, the instructions I provided show exactly how to get the BitcoinD
0.11.2 port going, however, it uses GCC 4.8 for the compilation.
Using OpenBSD's GCC version should work but will require a bit of
experimentation, I think adding
"--disable-tests --disable-debug" to ./configure will be
