On 2017/08/14 13:07, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> Sorry, but I can't find this in the FAQ. If a port is updated and
> committed on the stable OPENBSD_6_1 branch, new packages will not be
> built and uploaded to the package repositories, right?
Correct.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, but I can't find this in the FAQ. If a port is updated and
> committed on the stable OPENBSD_6_1 branch, new packages will not be
> built and uploaded to the package repositories, right? At least this
Hi,
Sorry, but I can't find this in the FAQ. If a port is updated and
committed on the stable OPENBSD_6_1 branch, new packages will not be
built and uploaded to the package repositories, right? At least this is
the way it appears to be.
Regards,
--
Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri,
National
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Edd Barrett wrote:
If it's just a matter of needing a new disk, what you need might be
sitting here collecting dust and if so, I'd be happy to send it to
you.
The faster disk this machine takes are fibre channel over copper scsi
disks (FC-AL). I would be surprised
Hi JC,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:47 PM, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you explain what you mean by a crunchy disk
Its an external SCSI disk from the early nineties ( i think) . It
makes a crunchy sound :)
and let me know if a
replacement disk would help?
If it's just a matter
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Edd Barrett wrote:
You ned to look in the test area. I have i386 up and after a rather
noisy night (trying to sleep with a crunchy disk blade 1000 in your
room), the sparc64 packages are ready for upload. I may not gt time
unil tomorrow.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:01:10PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
My own 2 sen: As much as your work is great, IMHHO the 'glue' is missing.
We sysadmins (at least me) have no time at all to visit a website (yours)
regularly and manually compare the list of patches with our various
installations.
Edd Barrett wrote:
`pkg_add -u` is the way I would suggest you use our packages.
Thanks, Ed, this is great. So sad, it is a complete miss here, we are
running amd64 on Dual-Xeon.
In any case, both i386 and sparc package directories for 4.3 are empty
on your site.
Uwe
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:34:18PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
I tried
my best, until I ran out of time.
do you really think applying the patches to your local installation(s)
takes more time than figuring out what in the whole ports tree needs
to be patched, making the patches, testing them
Edd Barrett wrote:
Can you build packges for me then :P
Sure. But I said what I require: an automagic update of my ports tree,
one way or another.
If what Jacob mentions (cvs) helps you, we can set up one for you,
provided we don't run out of space.
Though I still believe it is easier to
On 1 Jun 2008, at 10:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 May 2008 at 18:50, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Uwe Dippel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edd Barrett wrote:
Can you build packges for me then :P
Sure. But I said what I require: an
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
OK,
Seeing as there has been a lot of whining on ports@ regarding the lack
of stable packages for OpenBSD-stable, I will be the first to set the
ball rolling.
http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett/obsd-stable/
Here you find
Edd Barrett wrote:
OK,
Seeing as there has been a lot of whining on ports@ regarding the lack
of stable packages for OpenBSD-stable, I will be the first to set the
ball rolling.
http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett/obsd-stable/
Here you find diffs and i386 packages of thunderbird and
Samba and rsync (and many other 4.{1,2,3} -stable ports) are available
at http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/ .
I'm not running -stable anywhere (moved all the servers to -current),
but will install it somewhere next week and see what I can do to help.
//mts
On 5/30/08, viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.3-stable/
http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.2-stable/
http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.1-stable/
Guess people care now that 4.3 was released? I had 4.3 stuff up since
the tree was tagged.
So lets work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an account?
@openbsd.org? No, I don't.
Has anyone agreed to officially bring back the stable tree?
One developer was interested in pursuing it, but he is very busy with
other things.
My own 2 sen: As much as your work is great, IMHHO
Uwe Dippel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an account?
@openbsd.org? No, I don't.
Has anyone agreed to officially bring back the stable tree?
One developer was interested in pursuing it, but he is very busy with
other things.
My own 2 sen: As much as your
in the hope that this way,
there will be even less reasons to mix stable and current
ports/packages.
2) As an experiment we will provide stable packages for 4.0/amd64. Fabio
Cazzin of NS3, Venice has kindly granted us access to a stable build
machine. As this machine is only accessible remotely
18 matches
Mail list logo
