On 11/15/20 9:30 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> Even an update to 1.8.5 which still has Python 2 support would be an
> improvement for
> the areas I have run into Sphinx issues.
>
> On 11/15/2020 4:12 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> It either needs the port splitting (py2-sphinx and py-sphinx) or sticki
Even an update to 1.8.5 which still has Python 2 support would be an
improvement for
the areas I have run into Sphinx issues.
On 11/15/2020 4:12 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
It either needs the port splitting (py2-sphinx and py-sphinx) or
sticking with a Python 2.7-compatible version. Getting t
need to
improve on only this part?
I'll start doing recursive updates on deps and rdeps after this
part looks fine.
Aisha
On 9/7/20 8:42 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
I'm following this email with multiple patches for
updating sphinx to the latest version 3.2.1 and attaching
its new dependencies
what I need to
improve on only this part?
I'll start doing recursive updates on deps and rdeps after this
part looks fine.
Aisha
On 9/7/20 8:42 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
I'm following this email with multiple patches for
updating sphinx to the latest version 3.2.1 and attaching
its new depe
> I'm following this email with multiple patches for
> updating sphinx to the latest version 3.2.1 and attaching
> its new dependencies.
> My apologies if this is not a good method to send patches
> but this does make the work a lot cleaner imo.
>
> There are a lot of th
I'm following this email with multiple patches for
updating sphinx to the latest version 3.2.1 and attaching
its new dependencies.
My apologies if this is not a good method to send patches
but this does make the work a lot cleaner imo.
There are a lot of things still left to do that I a
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:36:57PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > > Others have weighed in. I did send out an update to a version that
> > > still had python 2.x support. The question was raised if we needed to
> > > do that th
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 02:57:20PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> One thing that I am struggling with is to find documentation on doing
> testing of ports using pytest and python unittests.
> I know of MODPY_PYTEST and then the *-test blocks but MODPY_PYTEST is
> not always enough/ doesn't set the r
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Others have weighed in. I did send out an update to a version that
> > still had python 2.x support. The question was raised if we needed to
> > do that though. It has been suspected that most/all just use the binary
> sphinx is
On 9/7/20 3:43 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/09/06 20:45, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
>> old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
>
> For a long time it had an inactive maintainer listed, which is quite
> offputting when updating
On 9/7/2020 4:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020/09/06 20:45, Aisha Tammy wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
For a long time it had an inactive maintai
ed.
Best,
Aisha
I would love to see someone take a look at updating Sphinx. Even if it's not
the latest and greatest AFAIK it would still be an improvement. As in
like 1.8.5.
On 2020/09/07 06:36, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> > It's only ~50 ports.
> To my inexperienced self, *only* 50 is a lot :P
:)
It's easier when you write a file containing a list of pkgpaths, e.g.
www/py-flask
www/py-flask,python3
www/py-flask-wtf
www/py-flask-wtf,python3
www/py-frozen-flask
www/py-froz
On 2020/09/07 12:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 05:44:41AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 08:45:32PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
> > > old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 05:44:41AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 08:45:32PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
> > old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
>
> > I understand that its got a huge amount of rever
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 08:45:32PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
> old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
> I understand that its got a huge amount of reverse dependencies
> and can't just be updated at will, but I was wondering if i
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/09/06 20:45, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
> > old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
>
> For a long time it had an inactive maintainer listed, which is quite
>
On 2020/09/06 20:45, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
> old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
For a long time it had an inactive maintainer listed, which is quite
offputting when updating a port, especially one that is more than just a
quick
Hi,
I've noticed that the sphinx in ports is *really*
old and hasn't been updated for quite sometime.
I understand that its got a huge amount of reverse dependencies
and can't just be updated at will, but I was wondering if it might
be possible to add something like py-sphinx3 which is a differ
19 matches
Mail list logo
