[bcc: Vess]
Hi Predrag,
Thanks for the perspective and especially the tip about the Mathematica
install, which should be quite interesting to look at.
The number of different and often semi-specialized versions of Linux
has certainly multiplied in the years since years ago when we had to u
Austin Hook wrote:
> [bcc: Vess]
>
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> Linux compatibility should enable installing of:
>
> Mathematica
> Maple
> MatLab
> Oracle
>
> as well as Opera. I think Opera is a handy way of seeing how Flash can
> work.
> seems the easiest).
I have a feeling that you guys are thinking ab
[bcc: Vess]
Hi Nikolay,
Linux compatibility should enable installing of:
Mathematica
Maple
MatLab
Oracle
as well as Opera. I think Opera is a handy way of seeing how Flash can
work. (Despite many partial answers to the annoying Flash problem, Opera
seems the easiest).
There often are developm
* Austin Hook [2009-05-18]:
> Just curious, which way would you fix it?
I wouldn't care about it at all. In my opinion the fedora_base package
just exists to make opera and one or two other programs run and that's
it. If tools of the fedora_base package don't work, it doesn't matter,
we don't nee
[bcc: Vess]
Hi Nikolay,
OK, I have looked harder into this stuff. I now appreciate better why
OpenBSD's own ldd works with Linux object files. Not having had much
experience playing with libraries and linkable object formats since
way back, much less dynamically loaded modules, I looked aroun
