14.10.2010 18:16, Alex Vladimirovich wrote:
Has the issue Stuart mentioned here been fixed?
No.
But it doesn't touch the gui version of PuTTY, for which Stuart
done this GTK2 port.
Has the issue Stuart mentioned here been fixed?
No.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:51:43PM +0400, Alex Vladimirovich wrote:
> Make gtk2 putty build on 4.8-current with gcc4.
> Shut up "warning: missing sentinel in function call" that cames
> from unix/dtkdlg.c
> (http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/2_Sentinel_warning_missing_sentinel_in_function_call.html)
>
Make gtk2 putty build on 4.8-current with gcc4.
Shut up "warning: missing sentinel in function call" that cames
from unix/dtkdlg.c
(http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/2_Sentinel_warning_missing_sentinel_in_function_call.html)
Fix from espie@ (ignore "the address of ... will never be NULL")
for unix/gt
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:27:27PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:12:30PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
> > > Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:12:30PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
> > Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
> > > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> I think zaurus people and whatnot still prefers xmms.
Yup, xmms is not going anywhere.
--
Antoine
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
> Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
> > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > >
> > > apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> > > that us
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> >
> > apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> > that use it.
> >
> I guess I'm one of the few people that actually use XMMS but I sup
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:08:46 +0200 Anil Madhavapeddy
wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2010, at 02:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a lablgtk2 available based on gtk+2, but if the existing
> >> port isn't being used, is it worth the time to port the new one?
> >>
> >> http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
>
> apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> that use it.
>
I guess I'm one of the few people that actually use XMMS but I suppose I
could switch to Audacious instead (I think this needs an sndio
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:10:11PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> > and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> > if they could
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> hi,
>
> as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> if they couldn't be fixed and had an alternative, they were zapped.
What about ports th
On 26 Mar 2010, at 02:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> There is a lablgtk2 available based on gtk+2, but if the existing port
>> isn't being used, is it worth the time to port the new one?
>>
>> http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html
>>
>
> it's in /usr/ports/x11/lablgtk2;
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:43:04 + Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2010/03/25 16:09, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
> > wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past
> > > year, and especially
On 2010/03/25 16:09, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
> wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> > and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> > if they couldn't
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
wrote:
> hi,
>
> as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> if they couldn't be fixed and had an alternative, they were zapped.
>
>
On 2010/03/25 17:24, Bryan wrote:
> On 3/25/2010 5:17 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:32:17PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> >>security/crank
> >
> >It should be removed, IMHO (no activity on sourceforge since 2001,
> >and I never got any feedback or test reports
On 2010/03/25 21:32, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> hi,
>
> as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> if they couldn't be fixed and had an alternative, they were zapped.
>
> apart from the b
On 3/25/2010 5:17 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:32:17PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
security/crank
It should be removed, IMHO (no activity on sourceforge since 2001,
and I never got any feedback or test reports when I asked for more
than three years ago, whe
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:32:17PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> security/crank
It should be removed, IMHO (no activity on sourceforge since 2001,
and I never got any feedback or test reports when I asked for more
than three years ago, when I worked on a guile update).
Ciao,
K
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> hi,
>
> as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
> and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
> if they couldn't be fixed and had an alternative, they were zapped.
>
> apart from the
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:32:17PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> that use it. i've been trying to update audio/lopster to the most recent
> cvs snapshot (which uses gtk2) but to no avail so far.
Just remove lopst
hi,
as you may've noticed, i've been spending some time in the past year,
and especially last weeks to fix the ports that are still using gtk+1.
if they couldn't be fixed and had an alternative, they were zapped.
apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
that use it.
24 matches
Mail list logo
