2009/11/1 Predrag Punosevac :
> 2. Are you sure that you have to install TeXLive to begin with? I have
> heard that lots of people who use ConTeXt have alternative method of
> installing ConTeXt to Unix.
The ConTeXt minimals are self-contained and don't need TeXlive. They
are the recommed way to
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:30:39PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> > anyway, i am fine with a "monolithic" texlive package, i am
> > sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
> > job Edd).
>
> I have to admit first that du
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> anyway, i am fine with a "monolithic" texlive package, i am
> sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
> job Edd).
I have to admit first that due to the nature of my work I have to use
LaTeX and plain TeX. I know that ConTe
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> anyway, i am fine with a "monolithic" texlive package, i am
> sure it was difficult to put it together as it is (good
> job Edd).
Basically, I don't have time to split all of TL down any further than
I already do. You will probably f
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:28:49AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
> > Did you look at texlive_base? It should be a rather solid base for your
> > work.
> > In fact, it might suffice to install texlive_base, untar the ConTeXt
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
> Did you look at texlive_base? It should be a rather solid base for your
> work.
> In fact, it might suffice to install texlive_base, untar the ConTeXt
> files in /usr/local/share/texmf-local, and (re-)build the ls-R files.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:38:36PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:32:10AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
> > perhaps those parts of texlive could be subpackaged or split off...
> >
> > it's good to try and find ways around conflicts, if anything else
> > starts
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Joachim Schipper said that
> This may be a stupid question, but why? TeXLive already includes
> ConTeXt, and it should be possible to split ConTeXt from
> texlive_texmf-full into its own package (texlive_texmf-context).
all the tex distributions have
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:16:56AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i am working on a package that is a collection of more
> packages and other 3rd party files. it is analoguos
> to a kde or gnome metapackage that basically just installs
> all the application and their dependencies (
hmm, on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:32:10AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
> perhaps those parts of texlive could be subpackaged or split off...
>
> it's good to try and find ways around conflicts, if anything else
> starts to depend on them, they make things difficult for people using
> the system
On 2009/10/29 02:16, frantisek holop wrote:
> i am trying to put together a context minimals port,
> which is basically a minimal tex distribution. it needs
> pdftex, luatex, xetex, and other programs that do not
> have standalone openbsd ports as i write this. they exist
> in texlive but having
hello there,
some more info..
what this metaport is trying to do is quite simple
in theory:
fetch a
fetch b
fetch c
configure a
build a
configure b
build b
copy c
make package a_b_c-v1.0
would it be possible to divide this port up into subdirectories,
like
SUBDIR += a
SUBDIR +=
hi there,
i am working on a package that is a collection of more
packages and other 3rd party files. it is analoguos
to a kde or gnome metapackage that basically just installs
all the application and their dependencies (libraries).
i am trying to put together a context minimals port,
which is ba
13 matches
Mail list logo
