> the header file has size_t and that seems to make more sense.
> no bump in pkgname since there is no change except for on 64-bit
> architectures where it didn't built in the first place.
> comments?
More consistent yes, ok.
Thank you.
>
> Index: patches/patch-crypto_c
> ==
the header file has size_t and that seems to make more sense.
no bump in pkgname since there is no change except for on 64-bit
architectures where it didn't built in the first place.
comments?
Index: patches/patch-crypto_c
===
RCS fil
