Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-05-17 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 5/17/20 5:40 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > See what was committed. > Wow this is great news! Thanks a lot to everyone involved for their hard work :) Aisha > -- > Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. > > On 16 May 2020 23:44:32 Andrea Fleckenstein wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-05-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
See what was committed. -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 16 May 2020 23:44:32 Andrea Fleckenstein wrote: Hello, I had a bit of an issue compiling this again, I had change patch_configure to use gpg2 instead of gpg in the GMime check in order to get it to compile. Am I

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-05-16 Thread Andrea Fleckenstein
Hello, I had a bit of an issue compiling this again, I had change patch_configure to use gpg2 instead of gpg in the GMime check in order to get it to compile. Am I missing something here? I've been using this with emacs integration for a while now, tagging and searching seems to be working just

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-05-14 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:30:01PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Anyone want to import this now (or give me an ok to do so)? > Reattached. > (Worked on by various people including me, Olivier Taïbi, and Enric Morales) No reason not to import, but I was curious at not making the python

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-05-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
Anyone want to import this now (or give me an ok to do so)? Reattached. (Worked on by various people including me, Olivier Taïbi, and Enric Morales) On 2020/04/19 22:32, Stuart Henderson wrote: > This is now OK sthen@ to import. As there has been a fair bit of > interest in this over time, I

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
This is now OK sthen@ to import. As there has been a fair bit of interest in this over time, I think it might be worth considering this for commit before 6.7 if another committer agrees, but I would not like to add the dependency to neomutt until after release (because then notmuch build failures

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-19 Thread Olivier Taïbi
Oops, just realised that the addition of MODPY_VERSION as Stuart Henderson suggested means that sphinx-build-3 is installed as a dependency, instead of sphinx-build previously. The attached port reflects this (sphinx-build -> sphinx-build-3 in two files). On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:47:50PM

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-16 Thread Olivier Taïbi
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:47:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > for a standalone port, use "MODPY_VERSION = ${MODPY_DEFAULT_VERSION_3}", > the FLAVOR setup is for python modules (py-* ports). Thanks, I did that. > The update of the main copy in src/lib/libz has been done at least twice >

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-15 Thread Andrea Fleckenstein
Olivier Taïbi writes: > Here is further progress on this port, following versions by Enric > Morales and Stuart Henderson. I hope that this does not duplicate your > efforts. builds and installs on amd64 -current.

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-13 Thread Enric Morales
Hi Olivier, On 2020-04-10 20:21, Olivier Taïbi wrote: Here is further progress on this port, following versions by Enric Morales and Stuart Henderson. I hope that this does not duplicate your efforts. Thanks a lot for providing your effort. It's great that you are working on this too, since

Re: wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/04/10 20:21, Olivier Taïbi wrote: > Here is further progress on this port, following versions by Enric > Morales and Stuart Henderson. I hope that this does not duplicate your > efforts. > > There were three zlib-related bugs in notmuch: > 1) second argument () of gzerror() cannot be

wip: mail/notmuch

2020-04-10 Thread Olivier Taïbi
Here is further progress on this port, following versions by Enric Morales and Stuart Henderson. I hope that this does not duplicate your efforts. There were three zlib-related bugs in notmuch: 1) second argument () of gzerror() cannot be NULL, as gzerror() will write to this address. This was

Re: openbsd-wip/mail/notmuch fails to compile

2019-12-28 Thread Enric Morales
Hi Stuart, ports@, Carolyn, Sorry for the late reply. Thank you for working on this. The Notmuch devs fixed the use-after-free bug after you spotted it and also released 0.29.3 which I see you are already building in this new Makefile. I haven't had time to try it but will do tomorrow when I'll

Re: openbsd-wip/mail/notmuch fails to compile

2019-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/12/21 14:40, Carolyn Knight-Serrano wrote: > Howdy! I'm trying to build mail/notmuch but it fails to build openbsd-wip is a place to work on ports (possibly collaboratively) before submitting them when they're closer to being ready. Ports there are often not expected to work properly.

openbsd-wip/mail/notmuch fails to compile

2019-12-21 Thread Carolyn Knight-Serrano
') *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/openbsd-wip/mail/notmuch (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2556 'install') |Also the version of notmuch is outdated ||