CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Alexander Bluhm
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: bl...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/15 16:15:33 Modified files: devel/p5-File-Find-Object-Rule: Makefile distinfo Log message: update p5-File-Find-Object-Rule to 0.0306

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Alexander Bluhm
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: bl...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/15 16:03:36 Modified files: security/p5-Module-Signature: Makefile distinfo Log message: update p5-Module-Signature to 0.81

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > >>>Why is the python3 FLAVOR needed in the first place ? > >> > >> Basically to avoid forcing particular python version. > > > >I am not sure this is a really valid reason. > >Last time I talked ab

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/09/15 17:28, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > >My preference would be to pick one python version (preferably a current > >one rather than a several-years-on-life-support one...) and stick with > >it. > > Aren't we supposed to use whatever MODPY picks by default?

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/15 10:14:08 Modified files: mail : Makefile Log message: build gpgme,sasl and gpgme,sasl,slang flavours of mutt. todd@ requested gpgme,sasl,slang and if we're having that we should have t

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Stuart Henderson wrote: >My preference would be to pick one python version (preferably a current >one rather than a several-years-on-life-support one...) and stick with >it. Aren't we supposed to use whatever MODPY picks by default?

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >>>Why is the python3 FLAVOR needed in the first place ? >> >> Basically to avoid forcing particular python version. > >I am not sure this is a really valid reason. >Last time I talked about the same thing to sthen@ we agreed \ >it did not make sense to have FLAVORs for py

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Pascal Stumpf
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: pas...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/15 04:37:03 Modified files: lang/gcc/6 : Makefile distinfo lang/gcc/6/patches: patch-gcc_ada_gcc-interface_Makefile_in patch-gcc_config_pa_pa_c lang

CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Pascal Stumpf
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: pas...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/15 04:22:10 Modified files: lang/gcc/4.9 : Makefile lang/gcc/4.9/patches: patch-gcc_config_arm_openbsd_h patch-gcc_config_gcc

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2016-09-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/09/14 19:06, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Daniel Jakots wrote: > > >On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:02:11 -0600 (MDT), Dmitrij Czarkoff > > wrote: > > > >> CVSROOT: /cvs > >> Module name: ports > >> Changes by: czark...@cvs.openbsd.org2016/09/14 07:02:11 > >> > >> Modified files: > >