On 2013/12/05 10:57, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:37:07AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
MESSAGE should go; if every port which installed examples under
share/examples/portname printed a message about it, installing or
updating ports would be excessively
On 2013/12/09 18:54, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:57:32AM +0100, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
All done, attached is the updated version of the port, which is also
available here for download:
http://codigo23.net/openbsd/ports/phantomjs.tar.gz
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:57:32AM +0100, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
All done, attached is the updated version of the port, which is also
available here for download:
http://codigo23.net/openbsd/ports/phantomjs.tar.gz
Ok?
--
Do nothing which is of no use. - Miyamoto Musashi
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:37:07AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
MESSAGE should go; if every port which installed examples under
share/examples/portname printed a message about it, installing or
updating ports would be excessively noisy.
BUILD_DEPENDS on print/freetype seems unlikely to be
On 2013/12/04 10:58, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Ok, updated port attached.
I've applied fixes for most of the feedback, except with some notes:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:12:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
ksh should work for this script, no? it also calls out to
On 2013/11/28 08:50, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Yeah, completely forgot that the statically built binary will contain some
GPLed stuff. Should it be PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = No then?
No, it's ok to package, just the license marker in the comment needs updating.
MAKE_ENV =
27.11.2013 19:38 пользователь Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net
написал:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio
wrote:
Hi everybody (first time writing to this list)
Attached is a port for PhantomJS, a headless WebKit scriptable with a
JavaScript API. It
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 16:19, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
- Some of the .cpp source files use strcmp instead of strncmp, I'll try to
work
a bit more on this and send them some patches to fix it.
Unless you're thinking of a different string function, strcmp isn't a
bad function.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Hi everybody (first time writing to this list)
Attached is a port for PhantomJS, a headless WebKit scriptable with a
JavaScript API. It has fast and native support for various web standards:
DOM handling, CSS
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:37:23AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 16:19, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
- Some of the .cpp source files use strcmp instead of strncmp, I'll try to
work
a bit more on this and send them some patches to fix it.
Unless you're
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Hi everybody (first time writing to this list)
Attached is a port for PhantomJS, a headless WebKit scriptable with a
JavaScript API. It has fast
On 2013/11/27 16:38, Landry Breuil wrote:
We dont need yet another copy of qt4 and webkit in the tree
To be fair, we have a few copies of mozilla too :)
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:32:30PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/11/27 16:38, Landry Breuil wrote:
We dont need yet another copy of qt4 and webkit in the tree
To be fair, we have a few copies of mozilla too :)
Yeah, but 4 of them should hit the attic as soon as the last users
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 16:47, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Ok. Probably I need to understand first what an unsafe use of it means, as
mentioned in Security Recommendations in the porting page:
http://www.openbsd.org/porting.html#Security
1. I don't think strcmp belongs in that last.
NAME = phantomjs
VERSION = 1.9.2
PKGNAME = ${NAME}-${VERSION}
DISTNAME = ${PKGNAME}-source
...
WRKDIST = ${WRKDIR}/${PKGNAME}
these can be replaced with:
PKGNAME = phantomjs-1.9.2
EXTRACT_SUFX =
On 2013/11/27 11:56, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 16:47, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote:
Ok. Probably I need to understand first what an unsafe use of it means, as
mentioned in Security Recommendations in the porting page:
http://www.openbsd.org/porting.html#Security
Thanks a lot for the feedback Stuart.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:12:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
# BSD License
not if it bundles Qt, it isn't..
Yeah, completely forgot that the statically built binary will contain some
GPLed stuff. Should it be PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = No then?
17 matches
Mail list logo
