Re: [posted] Posted (#45965, Beecher) !

It looks like the HTML version of _Clementine_ in #45965 has been overwritten by this text, which I believe was supposed to be in #54965. Could you restore that when you move the Beecher book back to its place (assuming that's where it was intended to go)? Thanks, John On 06/23/2017 03:02 PM

Re: [posted] Posted (#50029, Reynolds) !

Indexers note: This and etext #49432 are by the Mormon elder George Reynolds (Reynolds, George, 1842-1909). The Gutenberg catalog currently misattributes them to another George Reynolds (Reynolds, George W. M. (George William MacArthur), 1814-1879). (Etext #49375 is also by Reynolds, George, 1842

[posted] Can someone repost these missing texts from the 9000s?

I'm updating my links to reflect the mass migration of Gutenberg files from the etext05/ directory to the new system, and not everything seems to have made it across. In particular, these etexts from the 9000s don't seem to be in the new system, though their files are gone from the old system on

Re: [posted] Posted (#37739, Putnam) !

Indexers note: The author of this book is named J. Harold Putman (not Putnam). The full Library of Congress authorized heading is "Putman, J. Harold (John Harold), 1866-1940". His name is spelled correctly in the title page transcription in the book text, but not in the Gutenberg header or the i

Re: [posted] REPosted (#255, Scavelle)

It looks like the author's last name is Scavezze, not Scavelle. (At least that's what he says in his README.) He doesn't seem to have a presence online that I can find. It might be useful to track him (or his heirs?) down, as this work is different from other Gutenberg releases in that you're ex

Re: [posted] REPosted (#758, NASA)

Thanks! The commentary accompanying the picture is unsigned, but I'm assuming it's by Michael Hart. (The plain text file has the perfect-justified column formatting that he was well known for.) If anyone knows differently, let me know, but that's how I'm crediting this one. I still miss him.

Re: [posted] Posted (#47113, Johnson) !

This was intended to go into #37113 (and was later reposted there, I see). Unfortunately, it looks like the prior occupant of #47113, Louis Tracy's _The Message_, was ousted in the process. Can its files be reposted there on gutenberg.org? (They should still be on mirror sites, I hope.) Thanks!

Re: [posted] Posted (#45105, Various) !

The 8-bit version of this one appears to have raw HTML markup in it, instead of accented text. Whoever posted this might want to look it over and resubmit. John On 3/9/14 11:55 PM, Joe Loewenstein wrote: Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 108, February 2, 1895, by Various 45105 [Edito

Re: [posted] Posted (#26467, Pyle) !

The HTML cover page for this one links only to the Chapter 1 files, for every chapter listed. Can someone fix and repost it? Thanks! John On 9/9/08 1:42 PM, Joshua Hutchinson wrote: Audio: The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood by Howard Pyle 26467 [Audio reading by Alex Foste

Re: [posted] Posted (#47853, Ingman) !

Did this go through? I'm not seeing it on the main Gutenberg site, a few days after this posted notice went out. John On 1/2/15 10:33 AM, David Widger wrote: Rimpisuon usvapatsas, by Alfred Emil Ingman 47853 [Subtitle: Seikkailukertomus Pohjan periltä] [Lan

Re: [posted] Posted (#48327, Schalk) !

Was this meant to be #47327? (All the other postings in this time period were in the 47000s, and there's nothing currently in files/47327 .) John On 11/11/14 11:04 AM, David Widger wrote: Thomas More, by Henriette Roland Holst van der Schalk48327 [Subtitle: Een treursp

Re: [posted] REPosted (#5029, Cleveland)

Thanks! By the way, is it worth also including the addresses from Cleveland's second, non-contiguous term? (Those would be the 1893-1896 addresses.) I don't see them in this file, or in the file at #5050, but they exist, and can be found as parts of Gutenberg etext #14137 under the "annual mess

Re: [posted] Posted (#45929, Brown) !

Did this take? I'm not seeing anything at the expected place for #45929 on gutenberg.org, though the note below went out Saturday. Does it need to be reposted? John On 06/28/2014 02:20 PM, David Widger wrote: From: David Widger mailto:cdwid...@gmail.com>> To: posted@lists.pglaf.org

Re: [posted] Posted (#45105, Various) !

I'm not seeing this one on the main Gutenberg servers (I'm getting no book or directory found when I check #45105). Does this need to be posted again? John On 03/09/2014 11:55 PM, Joe Loewenstein wrote: Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 108, February 2, 1895, by Various 45105 [Editor:

[posted] Gutenberg etext #6661 - meant to be reposted?

Was there an aborted reposting for Gutenberg etext #6661 (a volume from a set of Walter Scott's Waverley novels)? I don't see a posting for it under the new directory system, but the old files are now gone from the main site (though still present on some Gutenberg mirrors). I don't know of any re

Re: [posted] REPosted (#7488, Chisholm)

The within-text links don't seem to work in this book. In particular, they're of the form . The # sign should be used in the hrefs (e.g. Go to chapter 1), but *not* at the destination; it should be just there.) If you fix these, you might also want to change them to use id attributes, since

Re: [posted] REPosted (#9485, Field)

The earlier posting of this etext had JPEGs for the musical score snippets in a zipped HTML file (etext05/8abpt10h.zip). They seem to have been dropped from the reposted version, but they go in the 6 places where it has "[Illustration: Musical Notation]", toward the end of the HTML file. Could t

[posted] !!!Copyright issue: Re: Posted (#18346, McGuire and Piper) !

There's a note on this file saying "This etext was produced from Astounding Science Fiction, February and March, 1953. Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the copyright on this publication was renewed." Copyrights were renewed for the February and March 1953 issues of Astounding

Re: [posted] !!COPYRIGHT PROBLEM Re: Posted (#26303, Wodehouse) !

Thanks for your research into this. I believe you are correct that the majority of resources point to a later publication date. Pending your response, I agree it might be necessary to remove this from the collection. -- Greg On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:24:12AM -0500, John Mark Ockerbloom wrote:

[posted] !!COPYRIGHT PROBLEM Re: Posted (#26303, Wodehouse) !

as well, that renewal of a periodical issue's copyright also renews the copyright of content that first appears there.) Wikisource has recently withdrawn its copy of _Right-Ho, Jeeves_ due to copyright concerns, which is what tipped me off to the potential problem. I recommend that Project Gutenb

Re: [posted] Posted (#23905, Marx and Engels) !

The index file for this one has bad links for the audio files. (The links to the various parts number the parts as 01, 02, 03, e.g. 23905-01.mp3; but the actual files don't have a 0 in the part name; they're just 23905-1.mp3 and so on.) Can this be fixed? Thanks! John On 12/26/2007 03:22 PM

Re: [posted] Posted (#21565, Marx) !

Does anyone have detailed publication history on this one? I'm afraid it is likely to be still under copyright in the US, due to a GATT restoration. (Stenning was British, and appears to have lived into the 1950s at least, based on the output of his translations. This one seems to have come out

Re: [posted] Poated (#44360, Peters) !

I just saw another posting note using #44360 , but for another etext. (Amenities of Book-Collecting and Kindred Affections,by A. Edward Newton) Which one gets this one, and which gets another number? John On 12/05/2013 12:06 PM, Joseph E. Loewenstein, M.D. wrote: Jugend, Liebe und Leben, by Em

Re: [posted] Posted (#43001, Commission) !

It looks like this accidentally clobbered the old #43001, "Van Dyck", by Percy M. Turner. From the other parts, I'm assuming this was intended to be posted as #44001, not #43001. You might want to recover and repost appropriately. (I suspect the old #43001 is findable on mirrors.) Thanks! Joh

Re: [posted] Posted (#40680, Whitaker) !

I'm not seeing any files in the 40680 directory (about 36 hours after this note was posted). Did they make it into the right place, or is there a permissions issue on the directory? (I do notice that both 40680 and 40681 had been marked as "reserved", so I presume that whatever they were reserv

Re: [posted] Posted (#42783, Various) !

Again, the dating is correct in the metadata and PG header, but there's a date transcription error in the masthead (which transcribes the year as "1852" when it was "1853" in the original masthead, per the Oxford page images.) Can this be fixed? Thanks! John On 5/24/13 7:04 AM, David Widger w

Re: [posted] Posted (#42039, Various) !

While this is indeed the June 12 issue, whoever transcribed the masthead mistakenly put "June 5" in the transcribed dateline, probably because they forgot to change it from the previous issue. (I've checked the page images at Oxford; the original masthead did in fact say "June 12".) The erroneous

Re: [posted] REPosted (#7425, Alcott)

On 05/09/2013 04:07 PM, David Widger wrote: Corrections have been made in this file. It has been updated, removed from its old address in etext05 and filed under the new directory system. An html file has been provided. According to my datafile, there had been a zip file with HTML illustration

Re: [posted] REPosted (#9304, Faguet)

The translator on this one is actually Home Gordon, not Homer Gordon. Does the source text say differently? (I pulled up a page image version at Google, and it says "Home Gordon".) I also noticed on this one that the "old" directory only had 8inph10.zip in it. There was no copy of 8inph10.txt,

Re: [posted] REPosted (#5694, Sinclair)

"Love's Pilgrimage" is etext #5964, not #5694. (#5694 is "Scientific Papers (Physiology, Medicine, Surgery, Geology)"). Can these texts be put back in the right places? Thanks! John On 5/3/13 4:26 PM, David Widger wrote: This file has been corrected, updated, removed from its old address i

Re: [posted] Posted (#30697, Young) !

Indexers note: According to the Library of Congress, the author's name is Samuel (not "Samual") Hall Young. John On 12/17/2009 11:57 AM, Joe Loewenstein wrote: Alaska Days with John Muir, by Samual Hall Young 30697 [Link: http://www.gutenberg.org/3/0/6/9/30697 ] [

Re: [posted] Posted (#35364, Smith) !

Indexers note: According to the main body of this etext (and most of the catalog records I can find) the title of this book is "Ethel Morton at Sweetbrier Lodge" (not "...Sweetbriar...") John On 2/22/11 10:46 PM, Joe Loewenstein wrote: Ethel Morton at Sweetbriar Lodge, by Mabell S. C. Smith

Re: [posted] Posted (#31140, Stratemeyer) !

The image links in the HTML file for this one don't seem to work. (They reference a nonexistent 31140_files subdirectory instead of the existing images subdirectory.) Can this be fixed? Thanks, John On 1/31/10 2:44 PM, Al Haines wrote: Young Auctioneers, by Edward Stratemeyer

Re: [posted] Posted (#24176, Converse) !

Thanks! Is someone also going to go back and restore the old #24176 files? (I'm still seeing "Long Will" there when I visit gutenberg.org; it had been Robert Walser's _Jakob von Gunten_, and at the moment that hasn't yet disappeared from mirrors.) John On 02/25/2013 09:41 AM, David Widger wro

Re: [posted] Posted (#23902, Stevenson) !

I noticed when I was cataloging this that some of the readings in this collection are attributed to the wrong names in the HTML and readme.txt files. (For instance, the MP3 of reading 5 is by Hugh McGuire, not Grace Bush. The mp3 of reading 7, attributed to Hugh, is read by Kristen McQuillin; an

Re: [posted] REPosted(#1044, Twain)

Thanks! If I or someone else also wanted to add a plain vanilla ASCII version of this or other reposted texts, for compatibility with lower-tech systems and networks, how could we do that? (It's easy enough to generate such versions to upload, and do a sanity check before uploading. For instanc

Re: [posted] Posted (#41968, Deharme) !

Did this go out? I'm not seeing anything in the usual 41968 slot on gutenberg.org, and it's been a few days. John On 2/2/13 2:49 PM, Chuck Greif wrote: Les Merveilles de la Locomotion, by Ernest Deharme 41968 [Illustrator: B. Bonnafoux A. Jahandier

Re: [posted] REPosted(#652, Johnson)

Just a quick check on this one (and a few other reposts I've seen lately): is it no longer Gutenberg policy to require a plain vanilla ASCII version, even if the text is in English? (I gather the requirement was dropped a while ago for non-English works, since the ASCII often isn't very useful, b

Re: [posted] REPosted (#9264, Brandt)

The inlined images in this reposted version don't seem to work. (The img references refer to an "Images" subdirectory, but the actual subdirectory is "images", all lowercase, and most web servers, including gutenberg.org, are case sensitive.) Can this be fixed? Thanks! John On 1/18/13 11:27

Re: [posted] Posted (#39770, Various) !

This does indeed appear to be the July 21 issue, but for some reason the date given in the file body is June 21. Can this be fixed? Thanks! John On 5/23/12 11:33 AM, David Widger wrote: Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 107, July 21st 1894, by Various 39770 [Link: http://www.guten

Re: [posted] Posted (#38898 and #38794)

I can't find the posting announcements for them now, but it looks to me like #38898 is a duplicate of #38794 (both are Punch, Volume 146, March 4, 1914, produced by DP). Was there supposed to be something else in this slot? (I did see an announcement for a different book here, but it's one that