* David Bishop t...@gnuconsulting.com:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 07:31:23AM +0100, Martin Schmitt wrote:
David Bishop schrieb:
What are my options? I don't have a lot of experience with dovecot (it's
been a few years for me) and thus don't really know anything about its
SASL
Hi guys,
First and foremost, apologies if this message shouldn't be going to this
list, but it seemed like the logical place.
I have written a small tool for Postfix in Python that duplicates most of
the functionality of exiqgrep, a tool that comes bundled with Exim making
it easier for
I'll try to make that way today! Thanks for the advice!
2009/2/3 mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net
Gabor Hasenfrasz a écrit :
Dear All,
A company asked me to configure an archiving system on a postfix server.
After a little i've made a choice to maildrop as an archiving solution.
I've
Steven Redlich:
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\//
There is no error with this PCRE pattern. It works as expected
on my (non-Redhat) machine.
% cat /tmp/x
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\// foo
% postmap -q - pcre:/tmp/x EOF
http://baddomain.com/uTnsub/
foobar
EOF
Greetings
i have a user who is getting a ton of postmaster bounces. who or what
ever is spamming is using her address as the return reply, so all the
bounces and postmaster warnings are coming back to her and filling up
her account.
how can I alleviate this? I can't seem to get a handle
Hi there,
I tested this on RHEL 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 and the PCRE matched correctly.
Cheers,
Marc
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:36 +0200, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
Steven Redlich:
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\//
There is no error with this PCRE pattern. It works as expected
We have a mainframe client sending emails with the body containing null
characters. I found the message_strip_characters and
message_reject_characters options could resolve this issue but I'm
wondering if 'message_strip_characters = \0' could cause problems with
attachments containing null
On 2/4/2009, David Bishop (t...@gnuconsulting.com) wrote:
So are you recommending dropping courier for imap/pop completely? Or
just using the SASL portion of dovecot? I guess I don't particularly
care what imap/pop server I use, as long as it can use a
crypted-password from a mysql database,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:08:57AM -0500, Cory Coager wrote:
We have a mainframe client sending emails with the body containing null
characters. I found the message_strip_characters and
message_reject_characters options could resolve this issue but I'm
wondering if
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132] by john23.com with ESMTP
I received an email this morning that I was confused / concerned by. I
am looking at the headers however I am not sure exactly how to make
this out. This is obviously spam and I did not send myself spam.
The sender shows my email address as well as the recipient address
however when I view the
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:58:17AM -0500, Doug Jaquays wrote:
- The pickup fifo has been deleted from /var/spool/postfix/public
Make sure $queue_directory contains a private/pickup fifo.
This is a /var/spool/postfix/public/pickup fifo, there is not a
body check
if /^[ ]*Received:/
/^[ ]*Received: +from +(beth\.k12\.pa\.us) / reject forged client
name in Received: header: $1
/^[ ]*Received: +from +[^ ]+ +\(([^ ]+ +[he]+lo=|[he]+lo
+)(beth\.k12\.pa\.us)\)/ reject forged client name in Received:
header: $2
/^[ ]*Received:.* +by
Hello,
When I send a message to an inexistent email address and the receiving
MTA is down, like the following example:
av4 mail16:46:22postfix/smtppostfix/smtp[27440]:
11BD7750296: to=abcd...@destdomain.tld, relay=none, delay=10,
delays=0.03/0/10/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:52:45AM -0600, Matthew Hebert wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_recipient
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unknown_sender_domain
reject_unknown_recipient_domain
reject_unverified_recipient
Carlos,
The important piece of the headers when you're trying to figure out if the
headers are spoofed or your smtp config is broken isthe Received from/by lines.
See below
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com
wrote:
I received an email this morning
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
When I send a message to an inexistent email address and the receiving
MTA is down, like the following example:
av4 mail16:46:22postfix/smtppostfix/smtp[27440]:
11BD7750296: to=abcd...@destdomain.tld, relay=none, delay=10,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 01:34:10PM -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
The php mail() command (on *nix) defaults to come in through the pickup
daemon (using the sendmail(1) command).
It can also
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* David Bishop t...@gnuconsulting.com:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 07:31:23AM +0100, Martin Schmitt wrote:
David Bishop schrieb:
What are my options? I don't have a lot of experience with dovecot (it's
been a few years for me) and thus don't really know anything about
On 04.02.2009 18:14, David Bishop wrote:
[...]
So, the group-mind consensus is to use the following for a (relatively)
small virtual-hosting mail environment:
postfix (obviously) + dovecot's SASL for smtp-auth and maildir
dovecot for imap/pop
maia for spam/virus filtering (with clamav)
Is
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Our Postfix server is a gateway that forwards email to an internal
SPAM server configured to communicate with GroupWise.
We have noticed a recent slow down in email delivery to and from our
Postfix Servers. The queues do not show any email build up.
When
On Feb 4, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 04.02.2009, 14:42 Uhr, schrieb jeff donovan
dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have a user who is getting a ton of postmaster bounces. who or
what ever is spamming is using her address as the return reply, so
all the bounces and
jeff donovan wrote:
here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132] by john23.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.00) id A6C57D10052; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:23:17 -0500
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:21AM +0200, Marc Silver wrote:
The tool is available at http://draenor.org/public/python/pqgrep.py
Should you find any bugs/problems, please mail me.
The regexp parser is IMHO too fuzzy for production use outside your
own environment. It will generated false
Victor Duchovni:
[ Wietse is it safe to move queue files active - hold - incoming in
a short time? Could some recipients be delivered twice by two delivery
agents in parallel (both deliveries starting after the second incoming
to active transition)? ]
Each delivery agent holds a read
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:28:36PM +0200, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 04.02.2009 18:14, David Bishop wrote:
[...]
So, the group-mind consensus is to use the following for a (relatively)
small virtual-hosting mail environment:
postfix (obviously) + dovecot's SASL for smtp-auth and maildir
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
[ Wietse is it safe to move queue files active - hold - incoming in
a short time? Could some recipients be delivered twice by two delivery
agents in parallel (both deliveries starting after the second
Hi
Is there a guide to make use of postfix to send bulk email using postfix
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
[ Wietse is it safe to move queue files active - hold - incoming in
a short time? Could some recipients be delivered twice by two delivery
agents in parallel (both deliveries starting
* Udo Rader list...@bestsolution.at:
Hmm, I've never heard of dovecot being able to deal with non-plaintext
passwords in connection with SASL. Are you sure that that can be done
without patching?
I haven't used Dovecot like that myself, but the documentation indicates you
can set a
Udo Rader wrote:
Hmm, I've never heard of dovecot being able to deal with non-plaintext
passwords in connection with SASL. Are you sure that that can be done
without patching?
Dovecot supports[1] quite a few non-plaintext mechanisms.
1: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
jeff donovan a écrit :
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132]
Kaushal Shriyan a écrit :
Hi
Is there a guide to make use of postfix to send bulk email using postfix
use a mailing-list manager. mailman, sympa, ... etc.
Thanks for your assistance.
We have implemented the changes you requested. We still have have
time out issues.
We try the following:
When I try to telnet server 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out
or getting connected and very slow response
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:05:41PM -0600, Matthew Hebert wrote:
Thanks for your assistance.
We have implemented the changes you requested. We still have have
time out issues.
We try the following:
When I try to telnet server 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX...
telnet: Unable to connect to
Would some kind soul tell me what i am missing/mucking up here.
I haven an almost bog standard aliases file in /etc the only changes I
have made are (and yes I ran newaliases against it and the aliases.db
looks OK) -
root: postmaster+exam...@example.ca
postmaster:
Hi all,
I'm having a difficult time understanding why one of my machines is
showing modified Return-Path and From headers while another is not.
I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. Here's the
environment:
Two CentOS 4 servers, both running the same version of Postfix
sorry I screwed up, the xxx.txt attachment is my postconf -n output., I
should have made sure was correctly named.
JLA
We are running much better now.
We have increased out maxproc to 200 and added smtpd_timeout = 10 to
the main.cf.
It states that reducing the smtpd_timeout = should only be temporary.
No mail should be lost, as long as this measure is used only temporarily
We are running an older version of
I followed the instructions on
http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
to create your own certificate to use with google.
main.cf:
..
## this to use certificate I created:
## www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
relayhost =
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
I followed the instructions on
http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
to create your own certificate to use with google.
main.cf:
..
## this to use certificate I created:
##
J Sloan wrote:
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
I followed the instructions on
http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
to create your own certificate to use with google.
main.cf:
..
## this to use certificate I
On Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 Wietse Venema wrote:
I have a postfix making SQL queries
to PostgreSQL, and can see from postgresql logs that postfix does
set client_encoding to 'LATIN1'
How can I change that to use UTF8?
SMTP is an ASCII protocol, and that is likely not to change.
But
sean darcy wrote:
J Sloan wrote:
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
I followed the instructions on
http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
to create your own certificate to use with google.
main.cf:
..
## this to use
What values does postconf show for the following parameters?
smtp_tls_CAfile
smtpd_tls_CAfile
?
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
sean darcy wrote:
J Sloan wrote:
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
I followed the instructions on
Hi,
Can someone tell me how can you make postfix re-email on forwarded
mail accounts instead of forwarding so postfix complies with SRS / SPF
policy please?
There are SRS plugins for qmail but not for postfix - specifically
interested in the latest 2.6 version I built and am running.
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:58:52PM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
I followed the instructions on
http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
to create your own certificate to use with google.
You DO NOT need your own TLS-client certificate to submit mail to Google,
and
Victor,
Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:17:45 +0200, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
The regexp parser is IMHO too fuzzy for production use outside your
own environment. It will generated false positives with sufficiently
On Thursday, February 05, 2009 at 07:10 CET,
Marc Silver ma...@discoverylink.co.za wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:17:45 +0200, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
This is subject to race conditions. To safely delete messages,
they have to moved (postsuper -h) out
Thanks... I better understand Viktor's original reply now.
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:22:25 +0200, Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
No, that doesn't fix the race condition. Between your scan of the queue
and the actual removal of the message it could be delivered and replaced
by another
50 matches
Mail list logo
