2009/4/8 wen.yongzheng wen.yongzh...@adways.net:
I can set catchall mailbox in virtual_mailbox_map like this:
@domain.name domain.name/catchall/
But I really do not want to check or read the catchall mails, The only
thing I want to do is to remove all mails in catchall maildir. I wonder
if I
However, I just realized that I actually might not need to change
the domain. The -o overrides I need may only be the smtpd_tls_*
settings. I was just concerned about name mismatches with the
certificate, but whatever postfix thinks is the domain shouldn't
affect the client's
Barney Desmond 写道:
2009/4/8 wen.yongzheng wen.yongzh...@adways.net:
I can set catchall mailbox in virtual_mailbox_map like this:
@domain.name domain.name/catchall/
But I really do not want to check or read the catchall mails, The only
thing I want to do is to remove all mails in catchall
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi @ll,
i have a relay for exchange
which is configured with reject_sender_login_mismatch
with accounts allowed to send out for configured domains
at last a infected host generated a faked sender
which was rejected with not owned by user
unfourtunally the bounce
On Wed, April 8, 2009 12:14 pm, jittinan suwanrueangsri said:
I want to know message size of an email which was send through postfix.A
part of raw log is shown as below
Apr 8 14:22:02 MailSecure03 postfix/smtpd[32388]: BA1CE38965: client=
mail.example.com[x.x.x.x]
Apr 8 14:22:03
Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix logging is not yet documented - it is one of those ancient
pieces of version zero code that was meant to be replaced by real
code that is properly configurable.
If it's not broken, don't fix it. :)
Working with qmail all day, I really appreciate the postfix log
On Wed, April 8, 2009 05:04, wen.yongzheng wrote:
I can set catchall mailbox in virtual_mailbox_map like this:
@domain.name domain.name/catchall/
But I really do not want to check or read the catchall mails, The
only thing I want to do is to remove all mails in catchall maildir.
I wonder
Hi,
I'm trying to set up an autoreply system for my virtual users, and
right now I'm at the problem where i want the mail to be sent to both
virtual: and my autoreply:, so my question is, is it possible to have
both transports for one recipient?
What i want to accomplish is deliver the
hallo,
I have general quiestion about use of DNS checks.
I mean now checks of client IP. It's about PTR records, A records and maybe
A=PTR checks.
Q:
1. Do you use it?
2. If yes, what type do you use?
a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
b) or PTR=A check
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
--
Don't just do something...sit
On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
I don't think so.
In any case, PBS is a hack, use SASL.
Yeah, I've been trying to get SASL working for quite a long time.
Hi All
I want to know message size of an email which was send through postfix.A
part of raw log is shown as below
Apr 8 14:22:02 MailSecure03 postfix/smtpd[32388]: BA1CE38965: client=
mail.example.com[x.x.x.x]
Apr 8 14:22:03 MailSecure03 postfix/cleanup[32070]: BA1CE38965:
I think that the question is about the total connection lifetime.
Is there any way to limit the connection lifetime?
Imagine one random connection source with very slow interaction with
postfix (example: writing letter by letter in the socket), with this
(example a virus) you can use all
berny wrote, at 04/08/2009 05:41 AM:
2. If yes, what type do you use?
a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
b) or PTR=A check [reject_unknown_client_hostname]
3. What are your experiencies and opinion to it?
I have found it unsafe to use either. At the
Danilo Paffi Monteiro:
I think that the question is about the total connection lifetime.
Is there any way to limit the connection lifetime?
No. This would prevent delivery of large messages over slow connections.
However, Postfix 2.5 has an option to change SMTP server timeouts
when all
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Oguz Yilmaz oguzyilmazl...@gmail.com wrote:
On my postfix mail server I have RBL definitions at
smtpd_client_restrictions phase. At the moment 2 of 4 rbl's waiting until
tcp timeout without an answer when I try with nslookup.
It sounds like your dns recursor is
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:09:58AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
It's a shame, because enforcing these checks would have a noticeable
impact on spam, especially FCrDNS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_Confirmed_reverse_DNS
Sadly, I have been unable to uncover a method to use FCrDNS in
I tried a few variants and it seems multiple transports isn't possible
(?)
Is there another way to accomplish something similar? I know i can use
two domains, but i don't want to configure this manually for every
domain i create
8 apr 2009 kl. 13.20 skrev Jonathan Selander:
Hi,
I'm
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line
headers.
-- Noel Jones
Jonathan Selander wrote:
I tried a few variants and it seems multiple transports isn't possible (?)
Is there another way to accomplish something similar? I know i can use
two domains, but i don't want to configure this manually for every
domain i create
For multiple deliveries, you must
Henrik K wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:54 AM:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:09:58AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
It's a shame, because enforcing these checks would have a noticeable
impact on spam, especially FCrDNS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_Confirmed_reverse_DNS
Sadly, I have been unable
Noel Jones пишет:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
-- Noel Jones
It does if input header is multi-line... but catching newline char from
input
Artem Bokhan wrote:
Noel Jones пишет:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
-- Noel Jones
It does if input header is multi-line... but catching
Jorey Bump wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:09 AM:
At the extreme end, some major
registrars cannot pass these checks, which could put domains at risk for
recipients who depend on email reminders to renew their domain
registrations.
I guess we can add PayPal to the list of major players with poorly
Noel Jones:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
Noel Jones ?:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
-- Noel Jones
It does if input header is
Would you happen to have an example on a vacation script that works
with virtual users, or do i need to create one to suit my needs?
I find it hard to believe that there isn't a script out there that
does something as simple as this without being dependant on big weird
setups
8 apr 2009
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:15:24AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jorey Bump wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:09 AM:
At the extreme end, some major
registrars cannot pass these checks, which could put domains at risk for
recipients who depend on email reminders to renew their domain
registrations.
Greetings,
I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in the
address in the to: from:, and reply_to: .
I know that's
Walt Park:
Greetings,
I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in the
address in the to: from:, and reply_to: .
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Walt Park wrote:
Greetings,
I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in
All...
I'm using Postfix 2.5.6 with Dovecot 1.1.11 on Solaris 10 x86. I'm having
trouble getting Postfix to deliver virtual domain Maildir-format mail to
$home_mailbox. It only delivers it to the virtual user's home. A rather
exhaustive Google search returned some hits on the problem, but
Postfix logs all delivery attempts. The name of the file is usually
in /etc/syslog.conf.
Wietse
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:32:19AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
I don't think so.
That's too bad because concurrent R/O readers
Wietse...
Postfix logs all delivery attempts. The name of the file is usually in
/etc/syslog.conf.
I apologize for not mentioning it in my original e-mail. There's nothing
relevant in (in my case) /var/log/syslog. Postfix simply states,
(delivered to maildir), which is correct. It just
Hi,
when user+...@example.com gets forwarded to an external address through
virtual_alias_maps, the local part +foo is being kept.
This causes problems with e.g. GMX, which then bounces the mail, since
they consider +foo to be part of the username (and that does not exist).
Now I'm wondering if
Greetings,
I agree that if they have to ask, it's probably the wrong way, but it's not
my call. Unless they break protocol, I can not object, and have to make sure
things run as expected.
Thanks for the link.
Cheers,
Walt
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Victor Duchovni
On Wednesday, April 08, 2009 at 19:20 CEST,
Gary Chambers gwch...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using Postfix 2.5.6 with Dovecot 1.1.11 on Solaris 10 x86.
I'm having trouble getting Postfix to deliver virtual domain
Maildir-format mail to $home_mailbox. It only delivers it to
the virtual user's
Gary Chambers wrote:
All...
The problem is that mail is delivered to
$virtual_mailbox_base/domain1.com/home/test/
(/vhome/domain1.com/home/test/)
as opposed to $virtual_mailbox_base/domain1.com/home/test/$home_mailbox/
(/vhome/domain1.com/home/test/Maildir/). Local delivery is unaffected
Brian/Magnus...
I'm new to Postfix (a recent Sendmail convert), so I am assuming that I'm
missing some fundamental piece of information to get this to work as I
expect.
Fix your vmailbox map.
I knew I could do that and that it would work, but I misunderstood
(overlooked is more like it)
Guy wrote:
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
I found mailman
On 8-Apr-2009, at 10:19, Jonathan Selander wrote:
I find it hard to believe that there isn't a script out there that
does something as simple as this without being dependant on big
weird setups
Considering how much real hatred there is for vacation scripts and how
often they are abused
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the
sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL
system,
integrate that with Postfix. Don't do everything at the same time.
MySQL can be a tricky back-end
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL system,
integrate that with Postfix. Don't do
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:59, Daniel Hahler wrote:
when user+...@example.com gets forwarded to an external address
through
virtual_alias_maps, the local part +foo is being kept.
+foo is not 'the local part', 'user+foo' is the local user, and + is a
recipient delimiter. If you are passing the
LuKreme a écrit :
On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
I don't think so.
In any case, PBS is a hack, use SASL.
Yeah, I've been trying to get SASL working
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL system,
integrate that
On 8-Apr-2009, at 14:39, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the
sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL
Guy a écrit :
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop
postfix is MLM agnostic.
or one that people find particularly nice to
LuKreme a écrit :
All the help I've found on this has people adding a plaintext password
to the mysql database. This just feels wrong, immoral, sticky, icky,
and fill in any other words you like here from your favorite Thesaurus.
don't be too fanatic. storing passwords in the clear isn't
Jorey Bump a écrit :
berny wrote, at 04/08/2009 05:41 AM:
2. If yes, what type do you use?
a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
b) or PTR=A check [reject_unknown_client_hostname]
3. What are your experiencies and opinion to it?
I have found it unsafe
On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
of hacking...
Other than that, its great...
--
Best regards,
* Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
of hacking...
On 4/8/2009, Patrick Ben Koetter (p...@state-of-mind.de) wrote:
I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a
lot of hacking...
This will change in Mailman 3.
Dear postfix community,
I use postfix personally on my computer to send emails, also two mail
servers I am in charge of are running postfix.
Now I have a basic question about my personal computer postfix
configuration that I don't have a answer for:
I followed an fellow expert's suggestion and
I got this in log, message to postfix mailing list can not be sent
after I changed
relayhost = $mydomain
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:17:59PM -0500, Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
Apr 8 20:17:59 m364d1 postfix/cleanup[2364]: D9AC0B5B57:
message-id=20090409011759.ga2...@m364d1.ece.northwestern.edu
439
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:41:35PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
This causes problems with e.g. GMX, which then bounces the mail, since
they consider +foo to be part of the username (and that does not exist).
Then GMX is broken or misconfigured or just doesn't want to accept
delimited user names.
I guess this has been discussed a time or two already, but, as of yet,
I haven't found anyone that has found a real solution. We need the
ability to have around 1000 domains per physical server, while
allowing each domain to maintain their own sender blacklist (using the
sender's email address,
58 matches
Mail list logo
