OT - Re: Wildcard certs - why only one level deep?

2009-08-08 Thread Chris Babcock
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:28:58 -0400 Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote: I understand that wildcard certs can be considered a security risk, but is the risk really much greater if it includes a longer hostname? *.com Here's a better example. I might be willing to have my server say,

report to consolidate allowed messages

2009-08-08 Thread Clunk Werclick
Hello, I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed' messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusals and parsing this is quite straightforward. The entertainment commences when I try to

Re: report to consolidate allowed messages

2009-08-08 Thread Robert Schetterer
Clunk Werclick schrieb: Hello, I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed' messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusals and parsing this is quite straightforward. The

is there any way of distinguishing the bcc copy from the original?

2009-08-08 Thread Per Jessen
I'd like to treat the original and the bcc copy slightly different based on their content. Basically: a) original: if headerX matches condition1, override transport to divert email. b) bcc-copy: if headerX matches condition2, override transport to discard email. Anything that matches

Re: is there any way of distinguishing the bcc copy from the original?

2009-08-08 Thread Chris Babcock
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:24:55 +0200 Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: I'd like to treat the original and the bcc copy slightly different based on their content. Basically: a) original: if headerX matches condition1, override transport to divert email. b) bcc-copy: if headerX matches

Re: is there any way of distinguishing the bcc copy from the original?

2009-08-08 Thread Per Jessen
Chris Babcock wrote: On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:24:55 +0200 Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: I'd like to treat the original and the bcc copy slightly different based on their content. Basically: a) original: if headerX matches condition1, override transport to divert email. b)