Then forget about what I said.
you could do
pickup
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
but this applies to all mail submitted via the sendmail command, so it
will break mail sent from the system (cron, ...) or from the console.
consider using an smtp content
Frank Cusack:
until a name lookup has been done. But if that name lookup takes a
very long time, along with the connect postfix should log how long
ago the actual connect was.
The SMTP server can find out long the name/address lookup took.
It does not juggle TCP packets.
The sysadmin should
I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
For a good chunk of that time, I have wrestled on and off with this
problem off and on, playing with it for a bit,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Charles Boling
junk01+post...@boling.us wrote:
I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
For a good chunk of that time, I
Charles Boling:
I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
For a good chunk of that time, I have wrestled on and off with this
problem off and on, playing
Hi Folks,
I came across an add-on for Trac that allows tickets to be updated using
mail.
Email2trac is what it's called and the Postfix install is here:
https://subtrac.sara.nl/oss/email2trac/wiki/Email2tracMta
It has instructions on how to integrate with Postfix. I don't as yet have a
On 16-Jan-2010, at 12:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
To address that issue, I would like to be able to use another character
(_ or .) that is commonly accepted as part of email addresses, instead.
Address transformation mappings are always queried at recipient
validation time, so you can't use a
On 12/10/2009 11:37 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
It seems like understanding where the delay=86457
and delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18 come from would probably help me to
understand the 24 delay.
Not really. The message took 1 day to
Frank Cusack wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/download.html
US, CA, Bay area
http://www.tigertech.net/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
goes to a landing page, not a postfix download mirror
I'm the person who runs this mirror, and it's now working again. My
apologies.
We experienced a
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 06:14:45PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
The pre-active delay is measured from the time message is created until
it enters the active queue (in this case for the first time). So the
message was either:
- Not yet fully formed (delayed EOF in the
I would like to have a policy server checked in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions - but only if a previous permit_* check is
true. Can I do this without coding the check within the policy server?
Right now I have my standard smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
11 matches
Mail list logo
