Noel, Thanks again so much for all the great advice. I have since worked in
your changes (I have omitted the relay_recipients_maps for now, as I have to
device a scheme to synchronize my alias table between various domains).
Here is my currenet postconf -n, any other pointers would be great. I
The Doctor:
In: DATA
Out: 354 End data with CRLF.CRLF
Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error
Session aborted, reason: lost connection
For other details, see the local mail logfile
- End forwarded message -
And from a heavily debugged log
Apr 23 07:36:59 doctor
Hello all,
I'm setting up Postfix 2.6, speculatively, reading through the documentation
and building my configuration. It appears that the scenario I want is
somewhere between virtual and local deliveries.
What I want to do: .forward support, /etc/aliases support, detail address
(user-foo)
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
Hello all,
I'm setting up Postfix 2.6, speculatively, reading through the
documentation and building my configuration. It appears that the
scenario I want is somewhere between virtual and local deliveries.
What I want to do: .forward support, /etc/aliases support,
Hello!
Received about a dozen of the following 'delivery status reports' for
messages with the subject 'probe', all 'returned' to 'r...@hwcn.org'
all within a 10 minute period. Some report 'user unknown', others
like this one say 'deliverable'.
What is this? Symptom of hack?
- Charles
On
Additional info:
All that shows in the logs is,
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/pickup[14103]: 849CFF4569: uid=0
from=root
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/cleanup[2161]: 849CFF4569:
message-id=20100424122659.849cff4...@barton.hwcn.org
Apr 24 08:27:09 barton postfix/qmgr[6233]: 849CFF4569:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 01:24:37PM +0100, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
I'm setting up Postfix 2.6, speculatively, reading through the
documentation and building my configuration. It appears that the
scenario I want is somewhere between virtual and local deliveries.
What I want to do:
Charles Gregory:
Additional info:
All that shows in the logs is,
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/pickup[14103]: 849CFF4569: uid=0
from=root
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/cleanup[2161]: 849CFF4569:
message-id=20100424122659.849cff4...@barton.hwcn.org
Apr 24 08:27:09 barton
On 24 Apr 2010, at 13:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
I'm setting up Postfix 2.6, speculatively, reading through the
documentation and building my configuration. It appears that the
scenario I want is somewhere between virtual and local deliveries.
What I want to do: .forward
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 7:02 AM:
Perhaps you missed this in prior email:
- Send non-verbose logging.
- Send logging that covers an entire message life cycle from the
SMTP port to final delivery.
Wietse
Wietse, check the listserv logs and your MUA. He sent that
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
On 24 Apr 2010, at 13:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
I'm setting up Postfix 2.6, speculatively, reading through the
documentation and building my configuration. It appears that the
scenario I want is somewhere between virtual and local deliveries.
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation effects, that
is an option that I haven't considered before.
I deleted a very similar
On 4/24/2010 4:28 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Noel, Thanks again so much for all the great advice. I have since worked in
your changes (I have omitted the relay_recipients_maps for now, as I have to
device a scheme to synchronize my alias table between various domains).
Here is my currenet
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation effects, that
is an option that I haven't considered before.
I
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:48:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation
Hey all,
So I have tweaked my main.cf and enabled noplainpassword my sasl craps out.
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
works,
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplainpassword, noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
gives me
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplainpassword, noanonymous
^^^
Did you mean noplaintext?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_security_options
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
On 4/24/2010 1:09 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey all,
So I have tweaked my main.cf and enabled noplainpassword my sasl craps out.
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
works,
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplainpassword, noanonymous
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplainpassword, noanonymous
^^^
Did you mean noplaintext?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_security_options
I'm such a tard, I
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 10:48 AM:
Humor is OK provided that the receiving end does not feel ridiculed.
That's pretty much the reason I removed the humor before sending.
In this case, I made my joke the end of a list of more serious
explanations for the observed delays. That
On 4/24/2010 1:31 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplainpassword, noanonymous
^^^
Did you mean noplaintext?
The Doctor:
Speaking of humour, how can you support someone via e-mail
when the e-mail system seens shot?
People with an inoperable mail system can join the mailing list
through some other email account.
Wietse
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
I
On 4/24/2010 3:06 PM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctordoc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
??Out: 220
You were saying about complete life cycle and non-verbose logs
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
mailer-dae...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca -
Return-Path: double-bou...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Level:
On 4/24/2010 2:41 PM, The Doctor wrote:
You were saying about complete life cycle and non-verbose logs
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery
Systemmailer-dae...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca -
Return-Path: double-bou...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16)
The Doctor:
Apr 24 13:20:10 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[17053]: 0762D12CFB0D:
client=defout.telus.net[204.209.205.55]
Apr 24 13:20:41 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/cleanup[17311]: 0762D12CFB0D:
message-id=6ef179d262924e5a8c03336971544...@taskercomp
Apr 24 13:22:04 doctor doctor[31]:
Here is my reconstruction from this inadequate logging sample.
Apr 24 13:20:10 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[17053]: 0762D12CFB0D:
client=defout.telus.net[204.209.205.55]
Apr 24 13:20:41 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/cleanup[17311]: 0762D12CFB0D:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 06:36:48PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Here is my reconstruction from this inadequate logging sample.
Apr 24 13:20:10 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[17053]: 0762D12CFB0D:
client=defout.telus.net[204.209.205.55]
Apr 24 13:20:41 doctor doctor[31]:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Subject: [pfx] Re: WHAT IS probe Mail Delivery Status Report
(sigh) Mea Culpa... I try to remember to remove my list sorting tags
when I reply...
But this time, honestly, I was a bit focussed on the appearance
that my system had suddenly and
Perhaps you missed this in prior email:
- Send non-verbose logging.
- Send logging that covers an entire message life cycle from the
SMTP port to final delivery.
Wietse
It never ceases to amaze me, how really bright people (and I'm assuming
everyone on this list has an IQ above
31 matches
Mail list logo
