Hi,
I'm having trouble with TLS and correctly validating the certificate
and all of its alternate DNS names:
Aug 6 09:44:20 smtp01 postfix/smtp[24772]: setting up TLS connection
to mail.messaging.microsoft.com
Aug 6 09:44:20 smtp01 postfix/smtp[24772]: Peer verification:
CommonName in
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
Hello postfix admins,
I have always placed all restrictions in smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Over the last few days, I have been experimenting with breaking the
restrictions up into client, helo, sender, etc. I ran into something odd
(to me), when
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
I take it that I am expected to bottom post here. But is it ok, if I crop
out parts of the original message (if it's long)?
Yes.
Wietse
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using a cheaper
solution until it is replaced, which does not handle content filtering
as well with calls to our db at another network like the old router did
very well. So, I am trying to reroute all the mail destined for that
Postfix
On 8/19/2010 9:16 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using
a cheaper solution until it is replaced, which does not handle
content filtering as well with calls to our db at another
network like the old router did very well. So, I am trying to
On 19/08/2010 16:16, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using a cheaper solution until it is replaced, which does not
handle content filtering as well with calls to our db at another network like the old router did very well. So, I am
trying to
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both of these, I guess I just can't figure out how to
utilize these configuration options for a
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both of these, I guess I just can't figure out
On 8/19/2010 11:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both
On 8/19/2010 11:08 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Ah, I'm just stupid then, I thought that didn't work unless you were
using transport_maps in the first place, sorry. Thanks for clearing that up.
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is sending
verifications to the relayhost:
mx2# postconf -n
address_verify_map =
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to Postfix and eliminated Student email
On 8/19/2010 2:21 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
the reverse DNS requirement is AOL. A huge majority
of senders are correctly configured in
From: D G Teed
Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
reject_unknown_client_hostname = gives problems
On 8/19/2010 2:15 PM, p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
From: D G Teed Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
Hi All,
I need to re-install a new mail server.
So I have the actual server running on and ordered a new one where I'm
installing and configuring newer softwares.
It's done and I need to move all domains and it's accounts to the newer
server.
Once there are so many gigabytes to move, I'll need
Thanks for the responses and tip on reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
I've made the switch to that and it seems to catch many unmapped IPs.
I half suspected there was something less stringent I could go for,
and had not noticed that variant. We had only reject_unknown_client
from older
On 8/19/2010 2:58 PM, Ronan Lucio wrote:
Hi All,
I need to re-install a new mail server.
So I have the actual server running on and ordered a new one
where I'm installing and configuring newer softwares.
It's done and I need to move all domains and it's accounts to
the newer server.
Once there
On 8/19/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your
transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is
sending verifications to the relayhost:
On 8/19/2010 3:40 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is
sending verifications to the relayhost:
Aug 19 13:27:10 mx2 postfix/smtp[88103]: 9BD9A11417F:
to=step...@mrtampanorth.com,
On 8/19/2010 2:33 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/19/2010 2:21 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM,
Hi,
is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
greet_pause feature?
For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Hi,
is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
greet_pause feature?
For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
is a terrible idea.
The expirimental Postfix release has a better
Quoting Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 8/19/2010 2:15 PM, p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
From: D G Teed Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:30 PM
To: Morten P.D. Stevens
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: greet_pause feature with postfix?
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Morten P.D. Stevens:
is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the
sendmail greet_pause feature?
For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Wietse:
If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
is a terrible idea.
The expirimental Postfix release has a
28 matches
Mail list logo
