Am 10.01.2011 07:51, schrieb Samuel Sappa:
IIRC, Samuel stated in his original email mouss that he can successfully
send to gmail, yahoo, and others, but he can't receive from them.
This sounds like he has misconfigured his Postfix server, and that his
problem probably has nothing to do with
Hi,
I want to install Postfix 2.7.2 by compiling it from sources.
In the INSTALL file I saw the following statement:
In the instructions below, a command written as #
command should be executed as the superuser.
A command written as % command should be executed as an
Zitat von Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net:
On 2011-01-09 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
Does this still works for windows 2008 ad? :
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/mailrelay/#d0e149
or is there better way to do it?
In most
On 2011-01-08 Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
Does this still works for windows 2008 ad? :
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/mailrelay/#d0e149
or is there better way to do it?
The script is old. You are probably better off, if you use
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 10:17:57 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jan Johansson:
I have the following config:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
For that, specify
On 01/10/2011 11:06 AM, Buzai Andras wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I want to install Postfix 2.7.2 by compiling it from sources.
In the INSTALL file I saw the following statement:
In the instructions below, a command written as #
command should be executed as the superuser.
A
Hi,
I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the
latest Postfix release.
Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can
always learn something new.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:43 AM, John Adams mailingli...@belfin.ch wrote:
Am 10.01.2011 10:06,
Is there any security risk if I configure/compile all the sources
as the superuser? (I am referring only to the build/installation
process)
Unlikely but possible.
Could you please elaborate this a little? Maybe with an example?
Thank you,
Buzai
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:38 AM,
Am 10.01.2011 11:33, schrieb Buzai Andras:
Hi,
I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the
latest Postfix release.
Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can
always learn something new.
nobody said anything against
software packaging
On 1/10/11 12:51 AM, Samuel Sappa at cihuy...@gmail.com wrote:
My problem with postfix now solved, it's seem (IMHO) my ISP where I
register my DNS have problem, since both yahoo, gmail and others
required that recipient FQDN hostname must be resolve/reverse, from
hostname and to IP and IP to
Steve Jenkins:
Thanks, Wietse. The vanilla install of Postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 via yum
does indeed include an /etc/postfix/makedefs.out file.
For the benefit of anyone else looking for this info in the archives, the
AUXLIBS and CCARGS for that CentOS version are:
AUXLIBS=' -L/usr/lib
Am 10.01.2011 13:37, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 10.01.2011 11:33, schrieb Buzai Andras:
Hi,
I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the
latest Postfix release.
Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can
always learn something new.
nobody
Reindl Harald:
To your querstion about superuser:
NERVER EVER build sources as superuser necause
if there are bugs in the build-process you can
damage you system which is impossible with
restricted permissions.
As per the Postfix INSTALL instructions, compile as unprivileged
(but trusted)
Am 10.01.2011 14:11, schrieb John Adams:
As it may take some time to build up software packaging facility
where is the problem to take the source-package and
try to replace the programsource for a rebuild?
On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm, install it as builduser, put
the newer tarball under
Am 10.01.2011 14:23, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 10.01.2011 14:11, schrieb John Adams:
As it may take some time to build up software packaging facility
where is the problem to take the source-package and
try to replace the programsource for a rebuild?
On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm,
Am 10.01.2011 14:43, schrieb John Adams:
On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm, install it as builduser, put
the newer tarball under SOURCES, edit the SPECFILE and do
a rpmbuild -bb postfix.spec, i do this since a long time
necause i rebuild all our core-services with optimized
gcc-flags
I use
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:39:49PM +, IT geek 31 wrote:
My understanding is to prevent these errors, you obtain the root
certificate for each server mail certificate your Postfix server
connects to, append it to a pem file and reference it with
smtp_tls_CAfile in main.conf.
Not worth it,
I use Slackware.
And he is using Ubuntu
the basics still apply.
with other words: a system from the 1990's
... which is very up-to-date with it's software, much more than centos
or debian. And because I like KISS :)
you are not packaging because you do not want, you can not :-)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:33:28AM +0100, Buzai Andras wrote:
I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the
latest Postfix release.
Ubuntu 10.04 contains 2.7.0[1], Ubuntu 10.10 contains 2.7.1[2]. You n
Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:53:58PM +, Jan Johansson wrote:
/etc/postfix/transport:
someu...@example.com smtp:[172.31.254.160]
otheru...@example.comsmtp:[172.31.254.150]
# postmap /etc/postfix/transports
# postfix reload
Thanks. I got the answer a bit earlier on the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:20:08 -0500
Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com articulated:
I'll see whether there is interest in adopting the fine-grained TLS
logging code in 2.9.
Just my 2¢; however, I think it would be worth while.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
Hello list,
I have a nicely running Postfix installation which uses both virtual and
local users.
To prevent local mail being delivered to spool files, I have to alias
(via /etc/aliases) the relevant users to a virtual user, which is not
very elegant.
What I want to do is forward all mail,
On Thursday, 6th Januar 2011, 21:02:17 Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:56:48PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
In this case, it is not as critical to set such a flag, but it is
important to allow the existing scan to continue to completion, and
ignore or (just note) new
It is best used that way, especially if per-user lookups involve LDAP, MySQL
or similar. A more complex, but more performant solution is to rewrite each
type of user to a suitable domain that is routed to the rght place. Then, if
absolutely necessary use smtp_generic_maps to rewrite back to the
On 1/10/11 4:28 PM, Markus Treinen wrote:
Hello list,
I have a nicely running Postfix installation which uses both virtual
and local users.
To prevent local mail being delivered to spool files, I have to alias
(via /etc/aliases) the relevant users to a virtual user, which is not
very elegant.
I've been poring over this email for five days now, and just can't wrap my mind
around what Viktor's example configuration is doing. I understand what he
*says* it's doing, but I can't look at the configuration and see it. Can
someone explain?
Specifically, I don't see where the AND and OR
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:09:18PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
I've been poring over this email for five days now, and just can't wrap
my mind around what Viktor's example configuration is doing. I understand
what he *says* it's doing, but I can't look at the configuration and
Citando Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
Make sure you have a robust, low-latency LDAP infrastructure. The
trivial-rewrite service will query LDAP to determine the address class of
each domain, and qmgr(8) uses trivial-rewrite to resolve every recipient,
so LDAP becomes
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:35:23PM -0200, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
Mail arrives to b...@domain1.org (and b...@domain1.org has an alias to
bla...@domain2.org).
What do you mean by has an alias?
I'll try to explain with an example:
I have these 2 domains:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of course
promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show during testing.
Here's an example transcript, postconf -n is below
Out: 220 gilded-bat.laughingboot.net ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO [10.2.45.174]
Out:
* Bryan Harrison br...@bryanharrison.com:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of course
promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show during testing.
You are running gilded-bat.laughingboot.net?
If there's more information in the logs, I'm not finding
On 1/10/11 10:04 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of
course promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show
during testing.
Here's an example transcript, postconf -n is below
Out: 220 gilded-bat.laughingboot.net
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different
domains) to Postfix, I noticed that Postfix will create two
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:04:02PM -0800, Bryan Harrison wrote:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of course
promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show during testing.
Here's an example transcript, postconf -n is below
Out: 220
On 1/10/11 10:13 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different
domains) to Postfix,
Thanks for the blindingly quick reply.
* Bryan Harrison br...@bryanharrison.com:
I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of course
promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show during testing.
You are running gilded-bat.laughingboot.net?
Yes.
If
On 1/10/11 10:40 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote:
Jan 10 13:00:39 gilded-bat postfix/smtpd[3076]: warning: No server certs
available. TLS won't be enabled
As Victor correctly surmised.
--
J.
* Bryan Harrison br...@bryanharrison.com:
Jan 10 13:00:39 gilded-bat postfix/smtpd[3076]: warning: No server certs
available. TLS won't be enabled
Jan 10 13:03:15 gilded-bat postfix/smtpd[3191]: warning: No server certs
available. TLS won't be enabled
Jan 10 13:05:51 gilded-bat
Le 10/01/2011 10:33, Mark Alan a écrit :
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 10:17:57 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jan Johansson:
I have the following config:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
Le 10/01/2011 22:13, Zhou, Yan a écrit :
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different
domains)
Zhou, Yan:
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different
domains) to Postfix, I noticed that
Hi Everyone,
Not really an issue directly related to postfix, however I'm sure I can
get some goods ideas here.
I wish to host managed email servers for some customers. Each customer
will have their own email server which will be an all-in-one virtual
machine running postfix, dovecot and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Yan,
Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When
message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message,
which we will process.
If user sends a message with multiple
Hi,
I have few queries about changing mail priority level. presently we have taking
mail service from mail service provider, we want to bring up our own mail
server as primary.
mx entries
example.com mail is handled by 0 example.com.
example.com mail is handled by 10 mailhub.example.com.
On 1/10/2011 11:13 PM, Ramesh wrote:
Hi,
I have few queries about changing mail priority level. presently we have taking
mail service from mail service provider, we want to bring up our own mail
server as primary.
mx entries
example.com mail is handled by 0 example.com.
example.com mail
Hi Noel,
example.com listed in main.conf here is entries, after listing relay_domains, i
can see maillog, mailhub starts relaying to old primary mail server.
mydomain = example.com
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, mailhub.example.com
relay_domains = $mydomain
As you suggested
46 matches
Mail list logo
