答复: Why does 'help' not work at smtp prompt?

No help command in SMTP. You can visit http://freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/821/15.htm to get a sample command and usage. -邮件原件- 发件人: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-users@postfix. org] 代表 Homer Wilson Smith 发送时间: 2011年10月6日 05:29 收件人: postfix-us...@cloud9.net 主题: Why does 'h

TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

Hi My log files has a moderate amount of TLS warnings: postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem: 25614:error:14094416:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:s3_pkt.c:1102:SSL alert number 46: I'm aware that this could be (according to an older thread on this lis

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On 10/7/2011 2:50 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On 07.10.2011 21:20, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> If I may make a purely subjective comment: 2.5m spooled emails on a >> single host is insane. > > I'm not arguing that. In the end the system is supposed to cope with > 300k mails in 24h, balanced on t

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On 07.10.2011 21:20, Stan Hoeppner wrote: If I may make a purely subjective comment: 2.5m spooled emails on a single host is insane. I'm not arguing that. In the end the system is supposed to cope with 300k mails in 24h, balanced on two servers, which I think can be achieved without a lot o

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:20:06PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > If I may make a purely subjective comment: 2.5m spooled emails on a > single host is insane. I tested this scale some years back, it was actually the motivation for adding SMTP connection caching to Postfix ~2.1. If one's bulk engi

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On 10/7/2011 3:41 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Basically the only problem with postfix here is that I cannot have > queue_minfree > 2GB to be on the safe side, so I don't know how to avoid > this problem. There is a simple solution here, Comp Sci 101 type stuff, which Wietse has mentioned many t

Re: [OT] policyd-weight & rfci driving me up the wall..

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:09:47PM -0500, Gene wrote: > OK - I've recently started getting a massive increase in false positives all > due to: > multi.surbl.org; > rhsbl.ahbl.org; > dsn.rfc-ignorant.org; > postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org; > abuse.rfc-ignorant.org; > > and so on. > > Some googling t

Re: policyd-weight & rfci driving me up the wall..

On 10/7/2011 12:09 PM, Gene wrote: > OK - I've recently started getting a massive increase in false positives all > due to: > multi.surbl.org; > rhsbl.ahbl.org; > dsn.rfc-ignorant.org; > postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org; > abuse.rfc-ignorant.org; > > and so on. > > Some googling turned up a problem

policyd-weight & rfci driving me up the wall..

OK - I've recently started getting a massive increase in false positives all due to: multi.surbl.org; rhsbl.ahbl.org; dsn.rfc-ignorant.org; postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org; abuse.rfc-ignorant.org; and so on. Some googling turned up a problem from someone using opendns - I had made the same change

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Zitat von Bernhard Schmidt : Am 07.10.2011 16:01, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Someone on the XFS mailinglist believed it could be filesystem fragmentation after all. They need an aligned continous 16k block to allocate a new inode chunk, otherwise it will fail. I'm going to test that later.

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Am 07.10.2011 16:01, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: >> Someone on the XFS mailinglist believed it could be filesystem >> fragmentation after all. They need an aligned continous 16k block to >> allocate a new inode chunk, otherwise it will fail. I'm going to test >> that later. > > This could be che

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Zitat von Bernhard Schmidt : Hi, It's not the number of inodes as it is common on ext2/ext3 but the percentage of space occupied by inodes which is dependant on the inode size, the number and the size of the volume. Check with xfs_info, on the filesystems we are using xfs on the percentage is

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Am 07.10.2011 12:12, schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 07.10.2011 10:41, schrieb Bernhard Schmidt: >> Basically the only problem with postfix here is that I cannot have >> queue_minfree > 2GB to be on the safe side, so I don't know how to avoid >> this problem > have you considered using ext4 instead of

Re: : mails are not allowed to send with "from address" space

yasith tharindu: > How should i change the policy? > > as a example > (Do Not Reply) is not allowed but > (Do_Not_Reply) is allowed to send. There is no policy for email address syntax. The laws for Internet email address syntax are specified in RFC 5322

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Am 07.10.2011 10:41, schrieb Bernhard Schmidt: > Basically the only problem with postfix here is that I cannot have > queue_minfree > 2GB to be on the safe side, so I don't know how to avoid > this problem have you considered using ext4 instead of XFS? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP dig

Re: Multi value LDAP attributes

Thanks guys This was a big help. I added the virtual_alias_map directive created the associated file, had the return values be email addresses and boom all went smooth and creamy like fresh churned butter. Thanks again Bevan Trust that all thing would work out for the good. Keep standing. Keep

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Hi, > It's not the number of inodes as it is common on ext2/ext3 but the > percentage of space occupied by inodes which is dependant on the inode > size, the number and the size of the volume. Check with xfs_info, on the > filesystems we are using xfs on the percentage is 25% but it may be > diffe