From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Ashok Kumar J [ashok.jagathe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 5:55 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Implementation of compression technology
Hi
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Jim Seymour wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:41:07 +0100
Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
[snip]
delay=0, changed into delay=0.04, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.02,
Did you update pflogsumm as well?
Yup. You need Pflogsumm-1.1.1, at least, looks like. 1.1.3 has
Zitat von polloxx poll...@gmail.com:
Dear list,
We want to setup a outbound postfix server in our datacenter dedicated
to our customers.
We want separate logs, separate spool directories, possibility to set
mail quota per customer,
Didicated IP addresses per customer.
Do you guys have
On 1/9/2012 2:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Just as an idea for test , try using openvpn with lzo compression
between 2 servers may be more easy to implement, no idea if this would
fit and work like you want it
If the data pipe in question is site-to-site, i.e. a private link, not
internet,
polloxx:
Dear list,
We want to setup a outbound postfix server in our datacenter dedicated
to our customers.
We want separate logs, separate spool directories, possibility to set
mail quota per customer,
Didicated IP addresses per customer.
Do you guys have experience with this kind of
Hi all,
I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
before, and am at a loss.
I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
Exchange 2010 (Small Business Server 2011). My problem is that I can't
get TLS to work. The error message I get back in
Am 09.01.2012 17:19, schrieb Ben Curtis:
Hi all,
I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
before, and am at a loss.
I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
Exchange 2010 (Small Business Server 2011). My problem is that I can't
get
On 1/9/2012 10:19 AM, Ben Curtis wrote:
Hi all,
I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
before, and am at a loss.
I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
Exchange 2010 (Small Business Server 2011). My problem is that I can't
get
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:03:23AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Personally, I'd go for mandatory TLS between the two machines with no
encryption
(but compression) - I guess Victor will correct me, but I think
that should work.
That would be fine provided the OpenSSL libraries on both
On 2012-01-08 15:16, Bjørn Ruberg wrote:
On 01/08/2012 08:19 AM, Peter wrote:
On 08/01/12 20:00, Bjørn Ruberg wrote:
On 01/08/2012 03:26 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:22:47 +0100, Bjørn Ruberg wrote:
Be advised that if you plan to reject
*sender addresses* claiming to
First off, thanks for the help everyone!
Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly.
For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS
# openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -starttls smtp
I'm using 587, and this seemed to functioned just fine from a remote host:
One of my Postfix installs runs behind a NAT box. The host name for the local
private IP is in the .local domain, not suitable for public use in SMTP
sessions but suitable for trace fields. However, on IPv6, the host is a
first-class citizen on the net and has its own host name.
Can I
On 1/9/2012 2:24 PM, Ben Curtis wrote:
First off, thanks for the help everyone!
Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly.
For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS
# openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -starttls smtp
I'm using 587, and this seemed to
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject impersonation
of the sender address unless it is on an encrypted submission port;
this is the norm rather than the exception nowadays.
Be aware this may reject some legit mail. Feel free to do it
Am 09.01.2012 22:07, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject impersonation
of the sender address unless it is on an encrypted submission port;
this is the norm rather than the exception nowadays.
Be aware this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/9/2012 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 22:07, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject
impersonation of the sender address unless it is on an
Am 10.01.2012 04:32, schrieb Noel Jones:
in this case this is NOT legit mail, sites implementing this
way have to be rejected - a greeting ecard where you can
enter a e-mail-address which will be used as ENVELOPE sender
is badly broken
any web-application using a foreign ENVELOPE sender
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:36:42AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 22:07, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject impersonation
of the sender address unless it is on an encrypted submission port;
this
18 matches
Mail list logo
