Is there a way to disable address checking (both local user existance
and RFC compliance) before accepting an outgoing email?
Whenever I try to send a mail that includes a non-existant local user in
the recipient list the server immediatly complain a 5.1.1.
I'd like to change that behaviour m
Le 19 janv. 2012 à 02:18, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> bsd:
>> I wanted to know what are the symptoms of "SSL_accept error" and
>> "lost connection after CONNECT" ??
>
> The client hangs up when Postfix expects the TLS handshake.
>
> There was two ways that Postfix provides TLS service. One is STA
Thank you for your response. I've understood for the absolute limit.
But can you explain me what follows ?
virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail --> this is ok so all my mailboxes directory
will be under this directory.
But why for a user who has the following mail "firstname.n...@isc84.org" the
On 1/18/2012 3:26 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 4:46 AM, Konrad Rzepecki wrote:
>> I don't know why it take some much time, but it cannot be disabled
>> (fsync) in postfix due to delivery guarantee. However, my mails (those
>> ones) are not very important, and lost some of them is not a
Running the RHEL 5 version of Postfix (2.3.3), and Cyrus SASL from
version 2.1.22.
Currently, on an auth failure, saslauthd logs the username to the auth
facility, but not the connecting IP (which presumably it doesn't know
about). smtpd, which presumably does know the username, doesn't log it
(no
bsd:
> I wanted to know what are the symptoms of "SSL_accept error" and
> "lost connection after CONNECT" ??
The client hangs up when Postfix expects the TLS handshake.
There was two ways that Postfix provides TLS service. One is STARTTLS
mode (usually TCP port 587), and the other is TLS wrapper
Le 19 janv. 2012 à 00:12, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 1/18/2012 4:53 PM, bsd wrote:
>>
>> Le 18 janv. 2012 à 23:44, Noel Jones a écrit :
>>
>>> On 1/18/2012 4:34 PM, bsd wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debug a problem that we have with one of my client.
The symptoms are a very h
On 1/18/2012 4:53 PM, bsd wrote:
>
> Le 18 janv. 2012 à 23:44, Noel Jones a écrit :
>
>> On 1/18/2012 4:34 PM, bsd wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to debug a problem that we have with one of my client.
>>> The symptoms are a very high difficulty to connect to our server :
>>>
>>>
>>> Jan 18
On 18.01.2012 20:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix 2.9.0-RC1 is ready for download. Please report any problems
that may remain after a few months of cleaning up. The main changes
in no particular order are:
- Support for long, non-repeating, queue IDs (queue file names).
The benefit of non-repeat
Le 18 janv. 2012 à 23:44, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 1/18/2012 4:34 PM, bsd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to debug a problem that we have with one of my client.
>> The symptoms are a very high difficulty to connect to our server :
>>
>>
>> Jan 18 18:15:55 newmail postfix/smtpd[83432]: conn
On 1/18/2012 4:34 PM, bsd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to debug a problem that we have with one of my client.
> The symptoms are a very high difficulty to connect to our server :
>
>
> Jan 18 18:15:55 newmail postfix/smtpd[83432]: connect from
> adsl-99-98-44-85.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net[99.9
Hi,
I am trying to debug a problem that we have with one of my client.
The symptoms are a very high difficulty to connect to our server :
Jan 18 18:15:55 newmail postfix/smtpd[83432]: connect from
adsl-99-98-44-85.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net[99.98.44.85]
Jan 18 18:15:55 newmail postfix/smtpd[83
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:23:13PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix 2.9.0-RC1 is ready for download. Please report any problems
> that may remain after a few months of cleaning up.
The last two entries in the HISTORY file seem to have the wrong date.
FYI.
--
Eray Aslan
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Andreas Berton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Simone Ruffilli wrote:
Il 18/01/2012 10:35, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
> * Simone Ruffilli:
> > >whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive
> > >(~15k)
> > >recipient list, it takes foreve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/18/2012 1:31 PM, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Regarding to the mechanisms = login plain cram-md5, the
> cram-md5 is used for the noplaintext?
>
> What is the difference between using the "plain" and using the
> "login"?
some clients
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
..
>
>
> While it is possible to do wildcard rewriting with a simple regexp,
> it is *strongly* discouraged because it turns your server into a
> backscatter source. Your queue will fill with undeliverable bounces
> and eventually get you bla
On 1/18/2012 4:46 AM, Konrad Rzepecki wrote:
> I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case I
> send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused by
> fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (4 core AMD @
> ext4 @ LVM @ RAID10 @ 8disk) ~ 0.2
Thanks a lot.
Regarding to the mechanisms = login plain cram-md5, the cram-md5 is used for
the noplaintext?
What is the difference between using the "plain" and using the "login"?
Regards
Bilal
--- On Wed, 1/18/12, Noel Jones wrote:
> From: Noel Jones
> Subject: Re: noplaintext, What is t
Postfix 2.9.0-RC1 is ready for download. Please report any problems
that may remain after a few months of cleaning up. The main changes
in no particular order are:
- Support for long, non-repeating, queue IDs (queue file names).
The benefit of non-repeating names is simpler logfile analysis, and
e
On 2012-01-18 2:10 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:56 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-18 1:44 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Postfixadmin supports domain aliasing without losing recipient
validation (although I don't use it mys
On 1/18/2012 12:56 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-01-18 1:44 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> Postfixadmin supports domain aliasing without losing recipient
>>> validation (although I don't use it myself)...
>
>> Seems like a SQL tri
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:44:24AM -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Other than using TLS, how I can protect my self to make the
> password not possible to be discover?
You have ruled out TLS ... why? That's what most of the world is
using to do what you want to do.
--
http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- s
On 1/18/2012 12:44 PM, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> Other than using TLS, how I can protect my self to make the password not
> possible to be discover?
>
> What is the required to use the noplaintext? Because if I used it, I am
> getting error that it is not a valid mechanism, is there an
On 2012-01-18 1:44 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Postfixadmin supports domain aliasing without losing recipient
validation (although I don't use it myself)...
Seems like a SQL trigger on insert could easily create both entries
when one i
On 2012-01-18 1:43 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination,
check_client_access ${cidr}/allowed_clients.cidr, etc
Oh - I also disallow access to port 25 from any other IPs with the
firewall too...
--
B
Hi All;
Other than using TLS, how I can protect my self to make the password not
possible to be discover?
What is the required to use the noplaintext? Because if I used it, I am getting
error that it is not a valid mechanism, is there any required library to be
installed so I can use the nopla
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-01-18 12:10 PM, Noel Jones
> wrote:
> >On 1/18/2012 10:35 AM, João Pagaime wrote:
> >>as strange as it may seem I need to forward all email coming
> >>to DOM.com to DOM1.com and DOM2.com, regardless of the
> >>destination a
On 2012-01-18 11:36 AM, Jon August wrote:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
and we would like to use a third party to do our spam filtering. So,
we'd like to contin
On 2012-01-18 12:10 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/18/2012 10:35 AM, João Pagaime wrote:
Hello
as strange as it may seem I need to forward all email coming to
DOM.com to DOM1.com and DOM2.com, regardless of the destination
address at DOM.com
I almost got away with a configuration like this at "
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:59:46AM +0100, Hervé Hénoch wrote:
> In main.cf :
>
> home_mailbox = Maildir/
> virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail
> virtual_mailbox_domains = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domains.cf
> virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-accounts.cf
> virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/
[please don't top-post. Thanks.]
On 1/18/2012 11:24 AM, João Pagaime wrote:
> Hello Noel Jones
>
> thanks, that's my fallback situation: unroll all addresses from
> DOM1.com and DOM2.com:
>
> a...@dom.com a...@dom1.com, a...@dom2.com
> a...@dom.com a...@dom1.com, a...@dom2.com
>
>
> how
Am 18.01.2012 18:21, schrieb Jon August:
> So, both solutions work? I like the idea of a private port for my filtering
> service.
> If I was to go that route, should I take my smtpd_recipient_restrictions and
> mynetworks
> lines out of main.cf?
i do not know in detail because we are using
In the aliases file
@dom.com: toalldomain@localhost
toalldomains: @dom1.com, @dom2.com
make sure you have the wildcard entries setup in the virtual file
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of João Pagai
Hello Noel Jones
thanks, that's my fallback situation: unroll all addresses from
DOM1.com and DOM2.com:
a...@dom.com a...@dom1.com, a...@dom2.com
a...@dom.com a...@dom1.com, a...@dom2.com
however I would like to avoid that because of administrative overhead
(setup and future maintenance).
On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.01.2012 18:14, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.01.2012
Am 18.01.2012 18:14, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
> Hi,
>
> We have a postf
On 1/18/2012 12:10 PM, Jon August wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.c
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/v
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
> Hi,
>
> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
>
> and we would like to use a third party to do our spam filtering. So, we'd
>
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
>>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-co
On 1/18/2012 10:35 AM, João Pagaime wrote:
> Hello
>
> as strange as it may seem I need to forward all email coming to
> DOM.com to DOM1.com and DOM2.com, regardless of the destination
> address at DOM.com
>
> I almost got away with a configuration like this at " /etc/postfix/virtual"
>
> @DOM.
Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
>>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mys
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
>>
>> and we would like to use a t
Reindl,
Thank you very much for the help.
Is there a specific line in master.cf that I should amend? Or can I just drop
it in on the bottom?
-Jon
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a po
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:31:02PM -0600, Donovan Brooke wrote:
OSX Snow Leopard Server
I have managed to successfully setup a basic postfix server behind my
router, and I still have some hair left on my head.
I have a couple newb questions, if you don't mind (first time post
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
> Hi,
>
> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
>
> and we would like to use a third party to do our spam filtering. So, we'd
>
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
and we would like to use a third party to do our spam filtering. So, we'd like
to continue using the machine for authenticated outb
Hello
as strange as it may seem I need to forward all email coming to
DOM.com to DOM1.com and DOM2.com, regardless of the destination
address at DOM.com
I almost got away with a configuration like this at " /etc/postfix/virtual"
@DOM.com@DOM1.com, @DOM2.com
unfortunately postfix only
Konrad Rzepecki:
> W dniu 18.01.2012 13:03, Wietse Venema pisze:
> > Konrad Rzepecki:
> >> I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case I
> >> send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused by
> >> fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (
W dniu 18.01.2012 13:03, Wietse Venema pisze:
Konrad Rzepecki:
I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case I
send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused by
fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (4 core AMD @
ext4 @ LVM @ RAID10 @
W dniu 18.01.2012 13:07, Wietse Venema pisze:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
eatmydata postfix start
But I don't know if it's LD_PRELOAD trick will work with postfix out
of the box.
postdrop is setgid, and will not work with LD_PRELOAD.
Too bad :(
Why are you queuing one file per recipient? That reall
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> eatmydata postfix start
>
> But I don't know if it's LD_PRELOAD trick will work with postfix out
> of the box.
postdrop is setgid, and will not work with LD_PRELOAD.
Why are you queuing one file per recipient? That really
sucks performance even without a broken Linux fsync.
Konrad Rzepecki:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> W dniu 18.01.2012 10:29, Simone Ruffilli pisze:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k)
> > recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it.
>
> I have
Forgot to CC
Original Message
Subject:Re: Mailbox path not used
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:40:03 +0200
From: Tolga
To: Hervé Hénoch
On 01/18/2012 01:30 PM, Hervé Hénoch wrote:
Thanks for response but I want to keep virtual_mailbox_base =
/mnt/vmail but fo
W dniu 18.01.2012 12:03, Ralf Hildebrandt pisze:
* Konrad Rzepecki:
I've already tried SMTP. This make no change since it also create
queue file, which must be fsynced before client is notified about
successfully queuing...
sendmail submission writes two files (maildrop queue). SMTP submissio
* Konrad Rzepecki :
> >You can use mini_sendmail (which uses SMTP but gives you a sendmail
> >command for that)
>
> I've already tried SMTP. This make no change since it also create
> queue file, which must be fsynced before client is notified about
> successfully queuing...
sendmail submission
W dniu 18.01.2012 11:50, Ralf Hildebrandt pisze:
* Konrad Rzepecki:
I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case
I send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused
by fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (4 core AMD
@ ext4 @ LVM @ RAI
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Konrad Rzepecki :
>
> > I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case
> > I send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused
> > by fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (4 core AMD
> > @ ext4 @ LVM @ RAID10 @ 8dis
* Konrad Rzepecki :
> I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case
> I send ~10k-20k mails through sendmail wrapper. My problem is caused
> by fsync done on EVERY queued mail. It take on my servers (4 core AMD
> @ ext4 @ LVM @ RAID10 @ 8disk) ~ 0.2-0.3s for each one. Somet
W dniu 18.01.2012 10:29, Simone Ruffilli pisze:
Hello everyone,
whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k)
recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it.
I have similar problem, and I suspect you may also hit it. In my case I
send ~10k-20k mails
* Simone Ruffilli :
> smtpd_client_restrictions = *sleep 1*, reject_rbl_client
> bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client
> xbl.spamhaus.org
Ah DAMN
> Can that be somehow responsible of my slowness? I tried to send a
> mail to 2k generated non-existant remote addre
Il 18/01/2012 11:22, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Simone Ruffilli:
Each recipient has to be checked against virtual_mailbox_domains and
virtual_alias_maps (you don't have virtual_alias_domains set?), since
the recipient COULD be one of your own recipients.
make sure those queries are fast.
On 01/18/2012 11:59 AM, Hervé Hénoch wrote:
Hello
I've a postfix server with LDAP
In main.cf :
home_mailbox = Maildir/
virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail
virtual_mailbox_domains = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domains.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-accounts.cf
virtual_alias_maps
* Simone Ruffilli :
> No logs actually (I'll check if Thunderbird provides some useful log).
> On my last attempt thunderbird stood stuck for ~20 minutes
> ("Connected to smtp_server ..."), then postfix (rightfully so!)
> complained 5.1.1 about an unexistant local address (this one deserves
> anot
Hello
I've a postfix server with LDAP
In main.cf :
home_mailbox = Maildir/
virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail
virtual_mailbox_domains = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domains.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-accounts.cf
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
In ldap-a
Il 18/01/2012 10:35, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Simone Ruffilli:
> whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k)
> recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it.
How do you submit the mail? Got some logs?
No logs actually (I'll check if Thund
* Simone Ruffilli :
> Hello everyone,
>
> whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k)
> recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it.
How do you submit the mail? Got some logs?
> Has it something to do with address validation (which, if I
> underst
Hello everyone,
whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k)
recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it.
I've done everything in the checklist (namely DNS caching), but it seems
like the problem is not related to a DNS issue: tcpdump-ing port 5
68 matches
Mail list logo
