On 8/7/12 8:58 PM, email builder wrote:
Probably the best lesson to learn from postfixadmin is: you can
have
more than one lookup table in postfix per main.cf directive.
Postfixadmin uses 2 separate queries for regular aliases and
domain aliases.
from main.cf: virtual_alias_maps =
Le 07/08/2012 18:14, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:51:43PM +0200, zorg wrote:
Reading the manual, it explain that
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps override default_transport
Which selects the delivery agent and nexthop for *external* recipients
based on the
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
mailinglist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two issues.
After hard reading of
On 8/8/2012 3:41 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Yes, this is not a Postfix issue but a mail store issue. Nikolaos, what
mail server are you using? Cyrus, Dovecot, other?
As Viktor points out, building an HA mail server is not trivial. But we
can probably point you to HA docs, and mailing lists,
query = select if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
IFNULL((select dest from
aliases where addr = '%u...@example.com'), (select addr from users
where addr = '%u...@example.com')), NULL)
I've found that in conjunction with a 2nd query (the original
normal one), everything seems to work as
On 8/8/2012 12:24 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
It's Dovecot 2.0.
Addendum: We use Maildir and the load is low (aside spam). Only about
250 users/mailboxes (4G each). All servers are CentOS 5.8 (planning move
to 6.3).
Currently we have only one internal mail server (Postfix/Dovecot),
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michal Lipka:
Hello,
today I noticed I don;t have orig_to in my log file even that the address
is rewrited.
Incorrect. Postfix logs orig_to only if the address is rewritten
before it is delivered.
For example Postfix does not log orig_to AFTER a
On 8/8/12 11:27 AM, email builder wrote:
query = select if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
IFNULL((select dest from aliases where addr =
'%u...@example.com'), (select addr from users where addr =
'%u...@example.com')), NULL)
I've found that in conjunction with a 2nd query (the original
Hi!
A very little tool to watch mail.log in color:
http://sascha.huedepohl.de/mailtail
Sascha
On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
soft_bounce works as documented. The log may show a 5.x.x extended
status code, but the
With just a single binary I have 80% thought of it being a Trojan.
2012/8/8 Sascha Hüdepohl sas...@ravenworks.de
Hi!
A very little tool to watch mail.log in color:
http://sascha.huedepohl.de/mailtail
Sascha
Rob,
thank you very much for the pointers on reposting.
I turned off the -v setting on smtpd
The old virtual domain is resumearrow.com. The new, mysql-managed domain, is
parallelemail.com
If I run a postmap -q on my email address under both domains, the results are
the same:
email builder:
2) it's not intuitive to me that the query I have given to postifx
is conditionally executed.
And THAT is precisely what the documentation says.
Wietse
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:03:56PM +0200, Michal Lipka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Incorrect. Postfix logs orig_to only if the address is rewritten
before it is delivered.
For example Postfix does not log orig_to AFTER a content filter, when
virtual alias expansion
Thanks for this very plausible reason for not doing what I wanted :-) I
did not think about such circumstances.
Cheers
tobi
Am 07.08.2012 22:25, schrieb Reindl Harald:
be carfeul with such things
that you primary MX is up from the connection of your
backup-MX means virtually nothing
Am 07.08.2012 22:40, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
Why do you consider this a problem? Your backup MX should neither accept
nor allow anything the primary MX wouldn't.
Actually I do not consider this a real problem My setups on my
backup-mx are as identical as possible to my main-mx. It's just
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:03:56PM +0200, Michal Lipka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Incorrect. Postfix logs orig_to only if the address is rewritten
before it is delivered.
For example Postfix does not log orig_to AFTER a
On 8/8/2012 4:24 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 8/8/2012 3:41 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Yes, this is not a Postfix issue but a mail store issue. Nikolaos, what
mail server are you using? Cyrus, Dovecot, other?
As Viktor points out, building an HA mail server is not trivial. But we
can
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:48:40PM +0800, Alvin Wong wrote:
With just a single binary I have 80% thought of it being a Trojan.
23 lines of non-obfuscated bash.
--
Ben Rosengart Like all those possessing a library,
Sendmail, Inc. Aurelian was aware that he was guilty of
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:53:34PM +0200, mic...@lipka.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:03:56PM +0200, Michal Lipka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Incorrect. Postfix logs orig_to only if the address is rewritten
before
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:53:34PM +0200, mic...@lipka.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:03:56PM +0200, Michal Lipka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Incorrect. Postfix logs
* tobi tobs...@brain-force.ch [2012-08-07 18:46]:
Hi list,
Sorry list, hi Tobi:
I wanted to tell you that your DNSSEC for brain-force.ch is broken so
resolvers which validate DNSSEC will not be able to resolve your
domain (and so I can't send you mails directly). You might want to fix
this.
mic...@lipka.waw.pl:
10.0.15.24 is my mail frontend (receives mails from internet and
then relays them to appropriate server inside). it does only virus
scanning (with spamassassin). Is it important what's going on with
message on other server?
Naturally, since it is highly likely the
I've found that in conjunction with a 2nd query (the
original
normal one), everything seems to work as expected (including
aliases with only local parts like postmaster)
But I'm still unsure if this kind of query is correct, if
I'm
on the right track. Can anyone tell me if
2) it's not intuitive to me that the query I have given to postifx
is conditionally executed.
And THAT is precisely what the documentation says.
And THAT is merely what I was asking to have confirmation of (not sure why that
is so difficult)... because it's not intuitive, and also
a bad MBL sig quarantined a few 1000 legit msgs.
Thanks
Len
a bad MBL sig quarantined a few 1000 legit msgs.
Thanks
Len
On 8/8/2012 3:03 PM, email builder wrote:
I don't think mine is so confusing as you suggest if you take a second to
understand it. Maybe if you read it with some whitespace:
select
if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
IFNULL(
(select dest from aliases where addr =
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:07:09PM -0700, email builder wrote:
2) it's not intuitive to me that the query I have given to postifx
is conditionally executed.
And THAT is precisely what the documentation says.
And THAT is merely what I was asking to have confirmation of
(not sure
I don't think mine is so confusing as you suggest if you take a second
to understand it. Maybe if you read it with some whitespace:
select
if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
IFNULL(
(select dest from aliases where addr =
'%u...@example.com'),
email builder:
Postfix expects an empty set (i.e. no rows returned) if it is to respond
negatively that a virtual alias does not exist.
Returning NULL does not equal no rows returned.
email builder:
Are you sure??
100% confirmed. To return NOTFOUND, you MUST return NO RESULT.
Wietse
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:08:03PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
email builder:
Postfix expects an empty set (i.e. no rows returned) if it is to respond
negatively that a virtual alias does not exist.
Returning NULL does not equal no rows returned.
email builder:
Are you sure??
100%
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:40:22AM -0700, Scott Brown wrote:
The old virtual domain is resumearrow.com. The new, mysql-managed
domain, is parallelemail.com
If I run a postmap -q on my email address under both domains, the
results are the same:
[root@miltermatic log]# postmap -q
Rob,
Thank you very much for your help. It looks like the missing
virtual_alias_domains was the problem.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: postfix thinks mysql managed
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
soft_bounce works
is a guilty network for a freedom
Le 2012-08-08 20:07, Ben Rosengart a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:48:40PM +0800, Alvin Wong wrote:
With just a single binary I have 80% thought of it being a Trojan.
23 lines of non-obfuscated bash.
--
Hi Saldanha,
As per your config file:
- myhostname = labmail.temp.com
- allways_bcc = t...@temp.com
Maybe I am guessing wrong, but I believe you are trying to deliver the
allways_bcc messages to a domain that is hosted by the server
labmail.temp.com http://labmail.test.com; if that is the
Postfix expects an empty set (i.e. no rows returned) if it is to respond
negatively that a virtual alias does not exist.
Returning NULL does not equal no rows returned.
email builder:
Are you sure??
100% confirmed. To return NOTFOUND, you MUST return NO RESULT.
So with NULL,
Postfix expects an empty set (i.e. no rows returned) if it is to
respond
negatively that a virtual alias does not exist.
Returning NULL does not equal no rows returned.
Are you sure??
100% confirmed. To return NOTFOUND, you MUST return NO RESULT.
The common code that
2) it's not intuitive to me that the query I have given to
postifx
is conditionally executed.
And THAT is precisely what the documentation says.
And THAT is merely what I was asking to have confirmation of
(not sure why that is so difficult)...
It is difficult only
40 matches
Mail list logo
