On 03/30/2014 01:25 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> while i agree that it is a bad idea to take headers into account
I wouldn't say that, it depends on exactly what you're doing and how
much you're basing your decision to reject on that single piece of data.
> as well as Barracuda networks start
Am 30.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Peter:
> On 03/28/2014 10:16 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>> I'm seeing messages occasionally where the envelope sender is a
>> verifiable address at someone else's domain, but the from: header
>> contains some non-existent user @ our local domain.
>
> This is a very bad
On 03/28/2014 10:16 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I'm seeing messages occasionally where the envelope sender is a
> verifiable address at someone else's domain, but the from: header
> contains some non-existent user @ our local domain.
This is a very bad idea, to illustrate why here is the envelope se
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:16:18PM -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I'm seeing messages occasionally where the envelope sender is a
> verifiable address at someone else's domain, but the from: header
> contains some non-existent user @ our local domain.
>
> Can postfix reject those messages?
By its
Hello Viktor,
> > > Have you set "local_transport=dovecot-sa"? If so local aliases
> > > don't apply.
>
> Well, is that the transport name you were using, or not?
Yes, it is.
> You cut/paste my typo (sorry about the typo). It is "dovecot" not
> "dovectot".
Yes, I did - doh! My only apology i
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 08:04:20PM +0100, Markus Grunwald wrote:
> > Have you set "local_transport=dovecot-sa"? If so local aliases
> > don't apply.
Well, is that the transport name you were using, or not?
> > Instead of setting "local_transport = dovecot-sa" set:
> >
> > mailbox_transport
Hello Viktor,
> Have you set "local_transport=dovecot-sa"? If so local aliases
> don't apply.
>
> > Every site that I search told me to do it like one of these methods. What
> > am I
> > doing wrong, please?
>
> Instead of setting "local_transport = dovecot-sa" set:
>
> mailbox_transpor
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:09:51PM +0530, KK Patnaik wrote:
> About the questions raised by you, yes the SMTP server generates bounces
> messages and yes too many postmaster notices.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#notify_classes
(set it empty)
1. You have said nothi
Hi Viktor,
I have done the changes mentioned by you and now I see the delay has
decreased from around 6hours to 1hour. Now I would still like to reduce the
delay please suggest.
About the questions raised by you, yes the SMTP server generates bounces
messages and yes too many postmaster notices.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Markus Grunwald wrote:
> I'm trying to create a simple mail group using postfix version 2.9.6. I tried
> it two ways:
>
> 1) in /etc/aliases:
> wir: mar...@gna.de, brigi...@gna.de
> wir2: markus, bibi
This only works if the alias address (w...@example.co
Hello,
I'm trying to create a simple mail group using postfix version 2.9.6. I tried
it two ways:
1) in /etc/aliases:
wir: mar...@gna.de, brigi...@gna.de
wir2: markus, bibi
Then run newaliases (gna.de is only an example)
2) Add users to virtual_alias (where I have a bunch of working addresses):
11 matches
Mail list logo
