> On Aug 27, 2016, at 8:39 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2016 07:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks. The "cp -p" feature was not portable in the days that this script
>>> was written, but it should be safe to use now.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have to roll back this change, bec
Michael Orlitzky:
> On 08/27/2016 07:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks. The "cp -p" feature was not portable in the days that this script
> >> was written, but it should be safe to use now.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have to roll back this change, because it may
> > install files with non
On 08/27/2016 07:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. The "cp -p" feature was not portable in the days that this script
>> was written, but it should be safe to use now.
>
> Unfortunately, I have to roll back this change, because it may
> install files with non-root ownership.
>
> Those who
Wietse Venema:
> Ond?ej Lyson?k:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm sending a patch that eliminates certain (unwanted) warnings caused
> > by unnecessary update of modification time during 'make install'. See
> > the downstream bug report at [1] for more details. The attached patch
> > was created by Robert S
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:40:31AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2016, at 06:29, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> > I cannot praise Barracuda enough. Its absolutely necessary if you run a
> > busy MTA these days and have not given up control to Office365,Google :)
>
> I’ve had many issues with B
Hello!
We are setting different ways of implementation of high availability and
have some questions about handling postfix. Currently our cluster has 3
backend nodes with postfix and other email services. There is private
floating IP between HAProxys on front-end nodes that handles application
On 23 Aug 2016, at 06:29, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> I cannot praise Barracuda enough. Its absolutely necessary if you run a
> busy MTA these days and have not given up control to Office365,Google :)
I’ve had many issues with Barracuda over the years and would never recommend
them. They joined my per
On 2016-08-27 16:27, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
What may be a problem here?
you miss update of SPF plugin to a never version
you may need to if version > around rules there
so spf none only is used on versions that support it
upstream bug here
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 05:27:18PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Thank you Sean for all your help.
>
> I am focusing on amavisd-new / spamassassin for my efforts.
>
> I have started a thread in the amavisd-new users mailing list, since
> bayesian filtering is off-topic here.
>
> However, before
On 25/8/2016 7:46 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote:
Make sure the SPF rules have weights set, then check the spam report for
a message. If SPF is working, you should see at least one of the SPF
rules trigger for every message.
Thank you Sean for all your help.
I am focusing on amavisd-new / spamassa
10 matches
Mail list logo
