Re: 3.1.4 Compiled and Installed on OSX Sierra 10.12.2 Successful.

> On Feb 18, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Larry Stone wrote: > >> >> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni >> wrote: >> > >> If you have a pre-Sierra MacOS/X machine, perhaps building 3.1.4 there >> and copying the binaries will yield

Re: 3.1.4 Compiled and Installed on OSX Sierra 10.12.2 Successful.

> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:37:27AM -1000, Larry Stone wrote: > >> Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue? > > No. Insufficient time to figure out the innards of the new Apple > logging

Re: 3.1.4 Compiled and Installed on OSX Sierra 10.12.2 Successful.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:37:27AM -1000, Larry Stone wrote: > Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue? No. Insufficient time to figure out the innards of the new Apple logging subsystem. My laptop is just for Postfix development, so the issue has not as yet warranted much effort on

Re: Can anyone expain this difference between almost identical postfix installations

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:43:03PM +, Chris Green wrote: > I am trying to diagnose why messages from on system fail to arrive > whereas identical messages from another similar system arrive > successfully. > > Both systems are single board computers running postfix 2.9.6 under > Debian. The

Can anyone expain this difference between almost identical postfix installations

I am trying to diagnose why messages from on system fail to arrive whereas identical messages from another similar system arrive successfully. Both systems are single board computers running postfix 2.9.6 under Debian. The main.cf on both systems is identical. Both systems are connecting to the

Re: 3.1.4 Compiled and Installed on OSX Sierra 10.12.2 Successful.

Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue? I just tried upgrading my test system to Postfix 3.1.4 (from 3.1.1) and the logging started to go to the new Apple logging system. Immediately fell back to 3.1.1 and the logging is back to /var/log/mail.log. My initial make command (based on

Re: MySQL stored-procedure support for Postfix 3.2

On 2016-12-27 09:45, John Fawcett wrote: On 12/26/2016 10:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: John Fawcett: so long as the loop continues in the presence of a zero return code from mysql_next_result() and mysql_store_result is called for each one we will stay in sync. With the break above we will be

Re: Different treatment of ports 465 and 587 between postfix versions 2.9 and 3.1

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:30:08PM +1300, Peter wrote: > On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote: > > The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using > > are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to > > connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service

Re: Different treatment of ports 465 and 587 between postfix versions 2.9 and 3.1

On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote: > The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using > are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to > connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service on 587 for > some reason. At a WAG you have

Re: Different treatment of ports 465 and 587 between postfix versions 2.9 and 3.1

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:11:44PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > > On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Chris Green wrote: > > > > OK, so the older version is using SMTP STARTTLS which runs on port 587 > > This is how TLS has worked in MTA-to-MTA SMTP for the last > 15 years. > >