On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:26:49 +
MRob wrote:
> On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote:
> >> Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in
> >> postscreen?
> >
> > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2
> > zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2
On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote:
Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen?
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2
zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2
zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11*2
psb
On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote:
Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen?
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2
zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2
zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11*2
Why l
On 5 Mar 2018, at 16:38, MRob wrote:
Bill Cole said:
The postscreen DNSBL
configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send
spam.
So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in
postscreen?
Did you see "DNSBL" in that sentence? The "fqrdns" list is not a D
Maurizio Caloro skrev den 2018-03-05 22:45:
I think this email will never arivve
I have send in the past so meny Question but no are displayed.
Possible i'am banned?
why is you dkim sign 3 times on same mail ?
and dmarc failed
MRob skrev den 2018-03-05 22:38:
Bill Cole said:
The postscreen DNSBL
configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send
spam.
So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in
postscreen?
https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre
too much
On 3/5/2018 3:45 PM, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> I think this email will never arivve
>
>
>
> I have send in the past so meny Question but no are displayed.
>
>
>
> Possible i’am banned?
>
>
>
Yes, it works. Be aware some mail systems suppress showing your own
posts to mailing lists. Gm
On 3/5/2018 3:38 PM, MRob wrote:
> Bill Cole said:
>> The postscreen DNSBL
>> configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send
>> spam.
>
> So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in
> postscreen?
> https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pc
I think this email will never arivve
I have send in the past so meny Question but no are displayed.
Possible i'am banned?
Thanks for your fast answer, and sorry for my late reply Ok after reading
and configure me mailserver with postscreen i have the following situation
when i send any mail.
[Main.cf]
postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks, hash:/etc/postfix/access
[Master.cf]
Bill Cole said:
The postscreen DNSBL
configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send
spam.
So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in
postscreen?
https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre
Its maintained by same person as postwhite
On 5 Mar 2018, at 3:59, Karol Augustin wrote:
On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote:
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote:
Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection
but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ?
Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just n
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote:
Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move
my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ?
I forgot to add: when you use dnsbl entries at postscreen level, you
apparently won't need them in other postfix restrictions.
if you
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote:
Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move
my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ?
Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding.
On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote:
Not all DNSBLs are equivalen
On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote:
>
>> Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then
>> move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ?
>>
>> Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding.
>
> Not all DNSBL
15 matches
Mail list logo