On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 07:24, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 10:00, 황병희 wrote:
>
>> merr...@fn.de writes:
>>
>> > [...] do you think if it is possible to reject all mails from China?
>> Thanks
>>
>> How about moving to Gmail(Google Apps)? Gmail's spam defense is not bad, i
>>
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 10:00, 황병희 wrote:
> merr...@fn.de writes:
>
> > [...] do you think if it is possible to reject all mails from China?
> Thanks
>
> How about moving to Gmail(Google Apps)? Gmail's spam defense is not bad, i
> think.
I disagree. It often labels mailing list email as spam,
> By the way, you can find ASIA NETBLOCK on the internet and block them all
> easily.
My Postfix is running on Google Compute Engine's Ubuntu 18.04.
Actually i do not block anyone, any clients, any ip addresses.
#+BEGIN_SRC sh
soyeomul@bionic190316003:~$ cat ~/.forward
soyeomul+...@gmail.com
On 11/23/19 12:30 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Roland Köbler:
>
>> Or in short: DMARC intentionally breaks every mailinglist and every
>> mail-forwarding.
> I doubt that it is broken "intentionally". ;-)
>
> "[Ich habe] gefunden, daß Mißverständnisse und Trägheit vielleicht
> mehr Irrungen in
On 23 Nov 2019, at 10:13, Gianni Angelozzi wrote:
> Yes, I need smtp_sender_dependent_authentication because the upstream ISP
> will only accept incoming mails from the authenticated user.
That doesn’t imply a need for smtp_sender_dependent_authentication. That is
needed, AIUI, when you have
On 20 Nov 2019, at 21:51, merr...@fn.de wrote:
> We did get a lot of spam messages from Chinese providers. We speak not
> Chinese, do you think if it is possible to reject all mails from China?
> Thanks
This is what I do:
In crontab for root:
@reboot bash -c 'pfctl -t badguys -T add $(cat
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I need smtp_sender_dependent_authentication because the upstream
ISP will only accept incoming mails from the authenticated user.
The feature you suggest may not work on my scenario, because if I send
email from user1 but authenticating with user2 (the default
Gianni Angelozzi:
[ Charset ISO-8859-15 converted... ]
> Hi,
>
> I've set up sieve vacation reply but my postfix setup is using
> smtp_sasl_password_maps and smtp_sender_dependent_authentication.
>
> The problem is that Sieve will send the reply with "from=<>" to prevent
> bounces.
>
> This
+1 E10.
A colleague has dealt with them directly on technical/product and process
issues and their business and product ethics when compared to ours, leave a
lot to be desired.
"blocking China is blocking money" => sell ones soul to the devil.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:35 AM Rafael Azevedo
On 11/23/19 4:13 AM, Roland Köbler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from address from
>> the header?
> it unfortunately uses the from-header.
> (If it would use the envelope address, it would not cause that much
> problems.)
>
> Or in short: DMARC
On 11/23/19 4:26 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 09:14, Roland Köbler
> mailto:rk-l...@simple-is-better.org>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from
> address from the header?
> it unfortunately uses the
Hello,
There is a DNSBL maintained by bit.nl that allows you to block countries
with relative ease.
URL: https://noc.bit.nl/dnsbl/ascc/
IE: cn.ascc.dnsbl.bit.nl
This zone contains data regarding the ISO3166 countrycode and BGP
Autonomous System for any given IPv4 or IPv6 address. Every
Or maybe block them by ESP? I saw there is a Perl module listing those big
providers in China.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Data::ChineseESP
regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:33 PM, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> I've blocked the entire ASIA netblocks in my ASN.
> We don't exchange any information with
I’m not sure , you may refer this discussion,
https://serverfault.com/questions/779730/why-dont-my-domains-messages-to-a-google-group-get-their-headers-rewritten-so
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 19:10:51 Wesley Peng pisze:
> >
> > if you have
I've blocked the entire ASIA netblocks in my ASN.
We don't exchange any information with that part of the world, neither any
of our customers.
All we get from that part of the world is DDoS attacks, brute force attacks
and spam.
Sorry for those who don't agree with me, its ok, but I got tired of
Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 19:10:51 Wesley Peng pisze:
>
> if you have used a mail.ru email for google groups, when you posted
> message to group, it will replace From header with the list address.
Does it re-sign the message then? Because replacing the From: header would
break DKIM, as this header
I totally agreed with you @Rafa.
btw, is there any good reputation, strict standard email hosting for
suggestions? I currently use fastmail, it is good for personal usage, but I
heard some privacy problems for commercial use.
thanks.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
Hello
if you have used a mail.ru email for google groups, when you posted message to
group, it will replace From header with the list address.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 17:19:53 Wesley Peng pisze:
> > Google groups replace the from: with
Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 17:19:53 Wesley Peng pisze:
> Google groups replace the from: with their group address.
I have never seen it and I'm subscribed to many Google-based mailing lists.
They replace the envelope from address (like almost every mailing list
server does), but keep the original
Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 10:59:24 황병희 pisze:
>
> How about moving to Gmail(Google Apps)?
If someone is running their own mail server, do not ask them to move to
Gmail. That's what the big players like Google want - that everyone uses
their service and there are no more small, independent servers
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 09:14, Roland Köbler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from address
> from the header?
> it unfortunately uses the from-header.
> (If it would use the envelope address, it would not cause that much
> problems.)
>
> Or in short:
Google groups replace the from: with their group address. What I know the big
providers having strict DMARC setting are:
mail.ru
laposte.net
I am glad the more large providers like gmail, outlook don’t have this stupid
setting.
Regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Roland Köbler wrote:
>
Hi,
> when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from address from
> the header?
it unfortunately uses the from-header.
(If it would use the envelope address, it would not cause that much
problems.)
Or in short: DMARC intentionally breaks every mailinglist and every
23 matches
Mail list logo
