Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

2020-05-21 Thread Ralph Seichter
* Charles Sprickman: > I’ve been sort of opposed to greylisting in the past due to a userbase > that’s sensitive to delays, but… the spam is worse. Yeah, delays... Used to be people understood the difference between asynchronous messaging (i.e. email) and instant messaging. Nowadays it seems

Server returned error: "TLS Negotiation failed, the certificate doesn't match the host., code: 0"

2020-05-21 Thread nicolasciuffo
Hello,i am a relatively new postfix user I have problems in the configuration and I would like to share opinions >From already thank you very much I use RHEL8.2 with postfix-3.3.1-12 and openssl-1.1.1c-15 after switching from google to TLS, i can't send with an alias from gmail. I include log

Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

2020-05-21 Thread Nick
On 2020-05-21 19:49 BST, Charles Sprickman wrote: > What is your “go to” greylisting solution these days? It wasn't keeping much out after configuring postscreen and I gave up on greylisting about a year ago, so this might be out of date but: postgrey worked reliably for me without any fuss. --

Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

2020-05-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 21.05.20 14:49, Charles Sprickman wrote: I have a site with a very old domain that’s at the front of the alphabet. For some reason (age, alphabetical order, ???) that domain gets bombarded with spam before the senders make it onto any of the blacklists I use (even trialed a few for-profit

Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

2020-05-21 Thread Håkon Alstadheim
Den 21.05.2020 20:49, skrev Charles Sprickman: Hi all, I have a site with a very old domain that’s at the front of the alphabet. For some reason (age, alphabetical order, ???) that domain gets bombarded with spam before the senders make it onto any of the blacklists I use (even trialed a

Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

2020-05-21 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, I have a site with a very old domain that’s at the front of the alphabet. For some reason (age, alphabetical order, ???) that domain gets bombarded with spam before the senders make it onto any of the blacklists I use (even trialed a few for-profit blacklists). Literally some of these

Re: Outgoing DANE not working

2020-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Felker: > > The __RES value varies wildly between different platforms. __RES > > never changes for glibc, but it does change on other platforms. > > > > #define __RES 19991006// Fedora 30, glibc 2.29 > > #define __RES 19991006// Alpine 3.11.5, pretends-to-be glibc 2.29 >