On Monday, May 25, 2020 10:26:56 PM EDT Ian Evans wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:35 PM Ian Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:09 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On 24.05.20 21:04, Ian Evans wrote:
> >> >Based on another thread here, I want to move to using
> >>
> >>
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:35 PM Ian Evans wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:09 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
>
>> On 24.05.20 21:04, Ian Evans wrote:
>> >Based on another thread here, I want to move to using
>> postscreen/postwhite
>> >and ditch postgrey.
>> >
>> >Just want to make sure I
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:09 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 24.05.20 21:04, Ian Evans wrote:
> >Based on another thread here, I want to move to using postscreen/postwhite
> >and ditch postgrey.
> >
> >Just want to make sure I don't bungle stopping postgrey.
> >
> >So...
> >
> >- edit
Dnia 25.05.2020 o godz. 12:59:30 yuv pisze:
>
> The legal issue is NOTICE. NOTICE is the fact that the recipient knew
> or *should have known* the content of the message. Let me know if you
> want me to expand on the concept of notice.
You have explained it sufficiently in your message and I
> Greylisting has become pretty much useless. When I disabled it a
> couple years ago, the spam levers did not increase by any measurable
> amount. We now use just 3 RBLs and that seems to be a relatively
> acceptable level of spam.
Checking for %ge of messages that "return after defer" I see:
Am 24.05.20 um 17:19 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 23 May 2020, at 08:52, Thomas wrote:
or
The norm is to use an address along the lines you describe there. I use
no-reply@. Emails to that address are accepted and discarded. Do not
use a fake domain or someone else's domain, of course. You can
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:38 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> As a non-lawyer, it is hard for me to understand what you're trying
> to debate about.
The legal issue is NOTICE. NOTICE is the fact that the recipient knew
or *should have known* the content of the message. Let me know if you
want me to
Kris Deugau writes:
> micah anderson wrote:
>> Allen Coates writes:
>>> The web page https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html (about half-way down the
>>> page)
>>> has an honest - and fairly recent - appraisal of a number of DNSBLs.
>>
>> Its a little outdated...
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>
Luca Fornasari:
> "With Postfix versions < 3.4, the Postfix shared connection cache
> cannot be used with TLS, because an open TLS connection can be reused
> only in the process that creates it. For this reason, the Postfix
> smtp(8) client historically always closed the connection after
>
Scenario:
I am managing a Postfix 2.10 installation acting as an hub for
applications sending emails to the internet.
The Postfix installation in turn uses a relayhost that is an A record
resolving to n IP addresses; TLS to the relayhosts is negotiated
opportunistically anyway it always succeeds.
micah anderson wrote:
Allen Coates writes:
The web page https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html (about half-way down the page)
has an honest - and fairly recent - appraisal of a number of DNSBLs.
Its a little outdated...
For example:
Invaluement DNSBL
[Note: Commercial] ivmURI and ivmSIP
Dnia 25.05.2020 o godz. 14:33:36 Thomas pisze:
>
> FAX is much better because FAX is same as letter and working
> digital, nearly 100% yes or no. Email I did not know if it is
> arrived,
[...]
What do you actually want to achieve? Because from your messages it's hard
to understand what do you
On 25 mai 2020, at 13:56, Michael wrote:
>
> I've found the Barracuda rbl to be very useful.
>
> https://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
I'm using paid spamhaus RBL (local zone file rsynched) for a very long time, at
work, and we are very happy about it. I use complementary RBL also like
Am 24.05.20 um 17:19 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 23 May 2020, at 08:52, Thomas wrote:
or
The norm is to use an address along the lines you describe there. I use
no-reply@. Emails to that address are accepted and discarded. Do not
use a fake domain or someone else's domain, of course. You can
Hello,
> On 25 mai 2020, at 03:59, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:43 AM Ralph Seichter wrote:
>> Yeah, delays... Used to be people understood the difference between
>> asynchronous messaging (i.e. email) and instant messaging. Nowadays it
>> seems that no day goes by
I've found the Barracuda rbl to be very useful.
https://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
On 2020-05-25 3:21 am, Allen Coates wrote:
On 24/05/2020 23:22, micah anderson wrote:
We paid for access to spamhaus for a while, but they jacked up the
prices and now its far too expensive even for their
Allen Coates writes:
> On 24/05/2020 23:22, micah anderson wrote:
>> We paid for access to spamhaus for a while, but they jacked up the
>> prices and now its far too expensive even for their non-profit rate.
>>
>> What RBLs do people find to be effective now days? I was looking at
>> SpamRats,
On 24/05/2020 23:22, micah anderson wrote:
> We paid for access to spamhaus for a while, but they jacked up the
> prices and now its far too expensive even for their non-profit rate.
>
> What RBLs do people find to be effective now days? I was looking at
> SpamRats, which I did not know about
On 24.05.20 21:04, Ian Evans wrote:
Based on another thread here, I want to move to using postscreen/postwhite
and ditch postgrey.
Just want to make sure I don't bungle stopping postgrey.
So...
- edit main.cf and remove "check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023" from
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 02:06, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> Based on another thread here, I want to move to using postscreen/postwhite
> and ditch postgrey.
>
> Just want to make sure I don't bungle stopping postgrey.
>
> So...
>
> - edit main.cf and remove "check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023"
20 matches
Mail list logo
